Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure socket path is < 104 characters when STATE_PATH is set. #4909
Ensure socket path is < 104 characters when STATE_PATH is set. #4909
Changes from all commits
151930f
873293f
845fff3
916a96a
ff5d781
ccf9439
9d13546
e46948b
a6d91b0
f611c40
2e79fff
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aren't most of these test cases just tests of the
SocketURLWithFallback()
function? How long does this new set of tests take to run?Do you get the same effective test coverage if you update the single existing container command to use a path longer than 107 characters as the exception path?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, they're testing the
https://github.com/elastic/elastic-agent/blob/a6d91b029ae8c0b8ccf7bb391c8ac304fe1e9368/internal/pkg/agent/cmd/container.go#L773-L837
function and how it decides to create the socket path. The fact that it callsSocketURLWithFallback
is an implementation detail. It also needs to create some folders:elastic-agent/internal/pkg/agent/cmd/container.go
Lines 784 to 788 in a6d91b0
elastic-agent/internal/pkg/agent/cmd/container.go
Lines 794 to 796 in a6d91b0
All of this gets tested by the integration test.
Maybe we can remove one test case:
107 characters path
as it essentially is the same assmall path
.