[React18] Migrate test suites to account for testing library upgrades security-threat-hunting-explore #201142
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ary owned by security-threat-hunting-explore
eokoneyo
added
release_note:skip
|
/ci |
|
Pinging @elastic/security-threat-hunting-explore (Team:Threat Hunting:Explore) |
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
…-threat-hunting-explore
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
…-threat-hunting-explore
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
…-threat-hunting-explore
kapral18
reviewed
Dec 2, 2024
...lity_panel/data_quality_details/indices_details/pattern/hooks/use_ilm_explain/index.test.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ils/indices_details/pattern/index_check_flyout/hooks/use_current_window_width/index.test.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/common/components/guided_onboarding_tour/tour.test.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/common/components/guided_onboarding_tour/tour.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/common/components/guided_onboarding_tour/tour.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...plugins/security_solution/public/dashboards/containers/use_fetch_security_dashboards.test.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
#202586) …ndling Addresses #201142 - replace waitFor(() => new Promise(resolve => resolve(null))) calls with waitFor() expectation blocks - wrap remaining expectation blocks with waitFor() to avoid act warnings - Rename test files from `.test.ts` to `.test.tsx` where necessary. - Refactor components to use `FC` and `PropsWithChildren` for better TypeScript support. - Remove unnecessary `act` wrappers and streamline test setup functions. --------- Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
…-threat-hunting-explore
eokoneyo
deleted the
chore/testing-library-migration-for-security-threat-hunting-explore
branch
|
Starting backport for target branches: 8.x |
💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky
Failed CI StepsMetrics [docs]
History
cc @eokoneyo |
kibanamachine
pushed a commit
to kibanamachine/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2024
… security-threat-hunting-explore (elastic#201142) This PR migrates test suites that use `renderHook` from the library `@testing-library/react-hooks` to adopt the equivalent and replacement of `renderHook` from the export that is now available from `@testing-library/react`. This work is required for the planned migration to react18. ## Context In this PR, usages of `waitForNextUpdate` that previously could have been destructured from `renderHook` are now been replaced with `waitFor` exported from `@testing-library/react`, furthermore `waitFor` that would also have been destructured from the same renderHook result is now been replaced with `waitFor` from the export of `@testing-library/react`. ***Why is `waitFor` a sufficient enough replacement for `waitForNextUpdate`, and better for testing values subject to async computations?*** WaitFor will retry the provided callback if an error is returned, till the configured timeout elapses. By default the retry interval is `50ms` with a timeout value of `1000ms` that effectively translates to at least 20 retries for assertions placed within waitFor. See https://testing-library.com/docs/dom-testing-library/api-async/#waitfor for more information. This however means that for person's writing tests, said person has to be explicit about expectations that describe the internal state of the hook being tested. This implies checking for instance when a react query hook is being rendered, there's an assertion that said hook isn't loading anymore. In this PR you'd notice that this pattern has been adopted, with most existing assertions following an invocation of `waitForNextUpdate` being placed within a `waitFor` invocation. In some cases the replacement is simply a `waitFor(() => new Promise((resolve) => resolve(null)))` (many thanks to @kapral18, for point out exactly why this works), where this suffices the assertions that follow aren't placed within a waitFor so this PR doesn't get larger than it needs to be. It's also worth pointing out this PR might also contain changes to test and application code to improve said existing test. ### What to do next? 1. Review the changes in this PR. 2. If you think the changes are correct, approve the PR. ## Any questions? If you have any questions or need help with this PR, please leave comments in this PR. --------- Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Karen Grigoryan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit da2ede4)
💚 All backports created successfully
Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI. Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
kibanamachine
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2024
…grades security-threat-hunting-explore (#201142) (#202978) # Backport This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.x`: - [[React18] Migrate test suites to account for testing library upgrades security-threat-hunting-explore (#201142)](#201142) <!--- Backport version: 9.4.3 --> ### Questions ? Please refer to the [Backport tool documentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport) <!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Eyo O. Eyo","email":"[email protected]"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2024-12-04T16:10:37Z","message":"[React18] Migrate test suites to account for testing library upgrades security-threat-hunting-explore (#201142)\n\nThis PR migrates test suites that use `renderHook` from the library\r\n`@testing-library/react-hooks` to adopt the equivalent and replacement\r\nof `renderHook` from the export that is now available from\r\n`@testing-library/react`. This work is required for the planned\r\nmigration to react18.\r\n\r\n## Context\r\n\r\nIn this PR, usages of `waitForNextUpdate` that previously could have\r\nbeen destructured from `renderHook` are now been replaced with `waitFor`\r\nexported from `@testing-library/react`, furthermore `waitFor`\r\nthat would also have been destructured from the same renderHook result\r\nis now been replaced with `waitFor` from the export of\r\n`@testing-library/react`.\r\n\r\n***Why is `waitFor` a sufficient enough replacement for\r\n`waitForNextUpdate`, and better for testing values subject to async\r\ncomputations?***\r\n\r\nWaitFor will retry the provided callback if an error is returned, till\r\nthe configured timeout elapses. By default the retry interval is `50ms`\r\nwith a timeout value of `1000ms` that\r\neffectively translates to at least 20 retries for assertions placed\r\nwithin waitFor. See\r\nhttps://testing-library.com/docs/dom-testing-library/api-async/#waitfor\r\nfor more information.\r\nThis however means that for person's writing tests, said person has to\r\nbe explicit about expectations that describe the internal state of the\r\nhook being tested.\r\nThis implies checking for instance when a react query hook is being\r\nrendered, there's an assertion that said hook isn't loading anymore.\r\n\r\nIn this PR you'd notice that this pattern has been adopted, with most\r\nexisting assertions following an invocation of `waitForNextUpdate` being\r\nplaced within a `waitFor`\r\ninvocation. In some cases the replacement is simply a `waitFor(() => new\r\nPromise((resolve) => resolve(null)))` (many thanks to @kapral18, for\r\npoint out exactly why this works),\r\nwhere this suffices the assertions that follow aren't placed within a\r\nwaitFor so this PR doesn't get larger than it needs to be.\r\n\r\nIt's also worth pointing out this PR might also contain changes to test\r\nand application code to improve said existing test.\r\n\r\n### What to do next?\r\n1. Review the changes in this PR.\r\n2. If you think the changes are correct, approve the PR.\r\n\r\n## Any questions?\r\nIf you have any questions or need help with this PR, please leave\r\ncomments in this PR.\r\n\r\n---------\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>\r\nCo-authored-by: Karen Grigoryan <[email protected]>\r\nCo-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>","sha":"da2ede4839f935e7559e7394ebf2339ed5b9a900","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.0.0$":"main","^v8.18.0$":"8.x","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:skip","v9.0.0","Team:Threat Hunting:Explore","backport:prev-minor","React@18"],"title":"[React18] Migrate test suites to account for testing library upgrades security-threat-hunting-explore","number":201142,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/201142","mergeCommit":{"message":"[React18] Migrate test suites to account for testing library upgrades security-threat-hunting-explore (#201142)\n\nThis PR migrates test suites that use `renderHook` from the library\r\n`@testing-library/react-hooks` to adopt the equivalent and replacement\r\nof `renderHook` from the export that is now available from\r\n`@testing-library/react`. This work is required for the planned\r\nmigration to react18.\r\n\r\n## Context\r\n\r\nIn this PR, usages of `waitForNextUpdate` that previously could have\r\nbeen destructured from `renderHook` are now been replaced with `waitFor`\r\nexported from `@testing-library/react`, furthermore `waitFor`\r\nthat would also have been destructured from the same renderHook result\r\nis now been replaced with `waitFor` from the export of\r\n`@testing-library/react`.\r\n\r\n***Why is `waitFor` a sufficient enough replacement for\r\n`waitForNextUpdate`, and better for testing values subject to async\r\ncomputations?***\r\n\r\nWaitFor will retry the provided callback if an error is returned, till\r\nthe configured timeout elapses. By default the retry interval is `50ms`\r\nwith a timeout value of `1000ms` that\r\neffectively translates to at least 20 retries for assertions placed\r\nwithin waitFor. See\r\nhttps://testing-library.com/docs/dom-testing-library/api-async/#waitfor\r\nfor more information.\r\nThis however means that for person's writing tests, said person has to\r\nbe explicit about expectations that describe the internal state of the\r\nhook being tested.\r\nThis implies checking for instance when a react query hook is being\r\nrendered, there's an assertion that said hook isn't loading anymore.\r\n\r\nIn this PR you'd notice that this pattern has been adopted, with most\r\nexisting assertions following an invocation of `waitForNextUpdate` being\r\nplaced within a `waitFor`\r\ninvocation. In some cases the replacement is simply a `waitFor(() => new\r\nPromise((resolve) => resolve(null)))` (many thanks to @kapral18, for\r\npoint out exactly why this works),\r\nwhere this suffices the assertions that follow aren't placed within a\r\nwaitFor so this PR doesn't get larger than it needs to be.\r\n\r\nIt's also worth pointing out this PR might also contain changes to test\r\nand application code to improve said existing test.\r\n\r\n### What to do next?\r\n1. Review the changes in this PR.\r\n2. If you think the changes are correct, approve the PR.\r\n\r\n## Any questions?\r\nIf you have any questions or need help with this PR, please leave\r\ncomments in this PR.\r\n\r\n---------\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>\r\nCo-authored-by: Karen Grigoryan <[email protected]>\r\nCo-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>","sha":"da2ede4839f935e7559e7394ebf2339ed5b9a900"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.0.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/201142","number":201142,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[React18] Migrate test suites to account for testing library upgrades security-threat-hunting-explore (#201142)\n\nThis PR migrates test suites that use `renderHook` from the library\r\n`@testing-library/react-hooks` to adopt the equivalent and replacement\r\nof `renderHook` from the export that is now available from\r\n`@testing-library/react`. This work is required for the planned\r\nmigration to react18.\r\n\r\n## Context\r\n\r\nIn this PR, usages of `waitForNextUpdate` that previously could have\r\nbeen destructured from `renderHook` are now been replaced with `waitFor`\r\nexported from `@testing-library/react`, furthermore `waitFor`\r\nthat would also have been destructured from the same renderHook result\r\nis now been replaced with `waitFor` from the export of\r\n`@testing-library/react`.\r\n\r\n***Why is `waitFor` a sufficient enough replacement for\r\n`waitForNextUpdate`, and better for testing values subject to async\r\ncomputations?***\r\n\r\nWaitFor will retry the provided callback if an error is returned, till\r\nthe configured timeout elapses. By default the retry interval is `50ms`\r\nwith a timeout value of `1000ms` that\r\neffectively translates to at least 20 retries for assertions placed\r\nwithin waitFor. See\r\nhttps://testing-library.com/docs/dom-testing-library/api-async/#waitfor\r\nfor more information.\r\nThis however means that for person's writing tests, said person has to\r\nbe explicit about expectations that describe the internal state of the\r\nhook being tested.\r\nThis implies checking for instance when a react query hook is being\r\nrendered, there's an assertion that said hook isn't loading anymore.\r\n\r\nIn this PR you'd notice that this pattern has been adopted, with most\r\nexisting assertions following an invocation of `waitForNextUpdate` being\r\nplaced within a `waitFor`\r\ninvocation. In some cases the replacement is simply a `waitFor(() => new\r\nPromise((resolve) => resolve(null)))` (many thanks to @kapral18, for\r\npoint out exactly why this works),\r\nwhere this suffices the assertions that follow aren't placed within a\r\nwaitFor so this PR doesn't get larger than it needs to be.\r\n\r\nIt's also worth pointing out this PR might also contain changes to test\r\nand application code to improve said existing test.\r\n\r\n### What to do next?\r\n1. Review the changes in this PR.\r\n2. If you think the changes are correct, approve the PR.\r\n\r\n## Any questions?\r\nIf you have any questions or need help with this PR, please leave\r\ncomments in this PR.\r\n\r\n---------\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>\r\nCo-authored-by: Karen Grigoryan <[email protected]>\r\nCo-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>","sha":"da2ede4839f935e7559e7394ebf2339ed5b9a900"}}]}] BACKPORT--> Co-authored-by: Eyo O. Eyo <[email protected]>
SoniaSanzV
pushed a commit
to SoniaSanzV/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2024
… security-threat-hunting-explore (elastic#201142) This PR migrates test suites that use `renderHook` from the library `@testing-library/react-hooks` to adopt the equivalent and replacement of `renderHook` from the export that is now available from `@testing-library/react`. This work is required for the planned migration to react18. ## Context In this PR, usages of `waitForNextUpdate` that previously could have been destructured from `renderHook` are now been replaced with `waitFor` exported from `@testing-library/react`, furthermore `waitFor` that would also have been destructured from the same renderHook result is now been replaced with `waitFor` from the export of `@testing-library/react`. ***Why is `waitFor` a sufficient enough replacement for `waitForNextUpdate`, and better for testing values subject to async computations?*** WaitFor will retry the provided callback if an error is returned, till the configured timeout elapses. By default the retry interval is `50ms` with a timeout value of `1000ms` that effectively translates to at least 20 retries for assertions placed within waitFor. See https://testing-library.com/docs/dom-testing-library/api-async/#waitfor for more information. This however means that for person's writing tests, said person has to be explicit about expectations that describe the internal state of the hook being tested. This implies checking for instance when a react query hook is being rendered, there's an assertion that said hook isn't loading anymore. In this PR you'd notice that this pattern has been adopted, with most existing assertions following an invocation of `waitForNextUpdate` being placed within a `waitFor` invocation. In some cases the replacement is simply a `waitFor(() => new Promise((resolve) => resolve(null)))` (many thanks to @kapral18, for point out exactly why this works), where this suffices the assertions that follow aren't placed within a waitFor so this PR doesn't get larger than it needs to be. It's also worth pointing out this PR might also contain changes to test and application code to improve said existing test. ### What to do next? 1. Review the changes in this PR. 2. If you think the changes are correct, approve the PR. ## Any questions? If you have any questions or need help with this PR, please leave comments in this PR. --------- Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Karen Grigoryan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>
SoniaSanzV
pushed a commit
to SoniaSanzV/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2024
… security-threat-hunting-explore (elastic#201142) This PR migrates test suites that use `renderHook` from the library `@testing-library/react-hooks` to adopt the equivalent and replacement of `renderHook` from the export that is now available from `@testing-library/react`. This work is required for the planned migration to react18. ## Context In this PR, usages of `waitForNextUpdate` that previously could have been destructured from `renderHook` are now been replaced with `waitFor` exported from `@testing-library/react`, furthermore `waitFor` that would also have been destructured from the same renderHook result is now been replaced with `waitFor` from the export of `@testing-library/react`. ***Why is `waitFor` a sufficient enough replacement for `waitForNextUpdate`, and better for testing values subject to async computations?*** WaitFor will retry the provided callback if an error is returned, till the configured timeout elapses. By default the retry interval is `50ms` with a timeout value of `1000ms` that effectively translates to at least 20 retries for assertions placed within waitFor. See https://testing-library.com/docs/dom-testing-library/api-async/#waitfor for more information. This however means that for person's writing tests, said person has to be explicit about expectations that describe the internal state of the hook being tested. This implies checking for instance when a react query hook is being rendered, there's an assertion that said hook isn't loading anymore. In this PR you'd notice that this pattern has been adopted, with most existing assertions following an invocation of `waitForNextUpdate` being placed within a `waitFor` invocation. In some cases the replacement is simply a `waitFor(() => new Promise((resolve) => resolve(null)))` (many thanks to @kapral18, for point out exactly why this works), where this suffices the assertions that follow aren't placed within a waitFor so this PR doesn't get larger than it needs to be. It's also worth pointing out this PR might also contain changes to test and application code to improve said existing test. ### What to do next? 1. Review the changes in this PR. 2. If you think the changes are correct, approve the PR. ## Any questions? If you have any questions or need help with this PR, please leave comments in this PR. --------- Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Karen Grigoryan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>
CAWilson94
pushed a commit
to CAWilson94/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2024
… security-threat-hunting-explore (elastic#201142) This PR migrates test suites that use `renderHook` from the library `@testing-library/react-hooks` to adopt the equivalent and replacement of `renderHook` from the export that is now available from `@testing-library/react`. This work is required for the planned migration to react18. ## Context In this PR, usages of `waitForNextUpdate` that previously could have been destructured from `renderHook` are now been replaced with `waitFor` exported from `@testing-library/react`, furthermore `waitFor` that would also have been destructured from the same renderHook result is now been replaced with `waitFor` from the export of `@testing-library/react`. ***Why is `waitFor` a sufficient enough replacement for `waitForNextUpdate`, and better for testing values subject to async computations?*** WaitFor will retry the provided callback if an error is returned, till the configured timeout elapses. By default the retry interval is `50ms` with a timeout value of `1000ms` that effectively translates to at least 20 retries for assertions placed within waitFor. See https://testing-library.com/docs/dom-testing-library/api-async/#waitfor for more information. This however means that for person's writing tests, said person has to be explicit about expectations that describe the internal state of the hook being tested. This implies checking for instance when a react query hook is being rendered, there's an assertion that said hook isn't loading anymore. In this PR you'd notice that this pattern has been adopted, with most existing assertions following an invocation of `waitForNextUpdate` being placed within a `waitFor` invocation. In some cases the replacement is simply a `waitFor(() => new Promise((resolve) => resolve(null)))` (many thanks to @kapral18, for point out exactly why this works), where this suffices the assertions that follow aren't placed within a waitFor so this PR doesn't get larger than it needs to be. It's also worth pointing out this PR might also contain changes to test and application code to improve said existing test. ### What to do next? 1. Review the changes in this PR. 2. If you think the changes are correct, approve the PR. ## Any questions? If you have any questions or need help with this PR, please leave comments in this PR. --------- Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Karen Grigoryan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>
Samiul-TheSoccerFan
pushed a commit
to Samiul-TheSoccerFan/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2024
… security-threat-hunting-explore (elastic#201142) This PR migrates test suites that use `renderHook` from the library `@testing-library/react-hooks` to adopt the equivalent and replacement of `renderHook` from the export that is now available from `@testing-library/react`. This work is required for the planned migration to react18. ## Context In this PR, usages of `waitForNextUpdate` that previously could have been destructured from `renderHook` are now been replaced with `waitFor` exported from `@testing-library/react`, furthermore `waitFor` that would also have been destructured from the same renderHook result is now been replaced with `waitFor` from the export of `@testing-library/react`. ***Why is `waitFor` a sufficient enough replacement for `waitForNextUpdate`, and better for testing values subject to async computations?*** WaitFor will retry the provided callback if an error is returned, till the configured timeout elapses. By default the retry interval is `50ms` with a timeout value of `1000ms` that effectively translates to at least 20 retries for assertions placed within waitFor. See https://testing-library.com/docs/dom-testing-library/api-async/#waitfor for more information. This however means that for person's writing tests, said person has to be explicit about expectations that describe the internal state of the hook being tested. This implies checking for instance when a react query hook is being rendered, there's an assertion that said hook isn't loading anymore. In this PR you'd notice that this pattern has been adopted, with most existing assertions following an invocation of `waitForNextUpdate` being placed within a `waitFor` invocation. In some cases the replacement is simply a `waitFor(() => new Promise((resolve) => resolve(null)))` (many thanks to @kapral18, for point out exactly why this works), where this suffices the assertions that follow aren't placed within a waitFor so this PR doesn't get larger than it needs to be. It's also worth pointing out this PR might also contain changes to test and application code to improve said existing test. ### What to do next? 1. Review the changes in this PR. 2. If you think the changes are correct, approve the PR. ## Any questions? If you have any questions or need help with this PR, please leave comments in this PR. --------- Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Karen Grigoryan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>
CAWilson94
pushed a commit
to CAWilson94/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2024
… security-threat-hunting-explore (elastic#201142) This PR migrates test suites that use `renderHook` from the library `@testing-library/react-hooks` to adopt the equivalent and replacement of `renderHook` from the export that is now available from `@testing-library/react`. This work is required for the planned migration to react18. ## Context In this PR, usages of `waitForNextUpdate` that previously could have been destructured from `renderHook` are now been replaced with `waitFor` exported from `@testing-library/react`, furthermore `waitFor` that would also have been destructured from the same renderHook result is now been replaced with `waitFor` from the export of `@testing-library/react`. ***Why is `waitFor` a sufficient enough replacement for `waitForNextUpdate`, and better for testing values subject to async computations?*** WaitFor will retry the provided callback if an error is returned, till the configured timeout elapses. By default the retry interval is `50ms` with a timeout value of `1000ms` that effectively translates to at least 20 retries for assertions placed within waitFor. See https://testing-library.com/docs/dom-testing-library/api-async/#waitfor for more information. This however means that for person's writing tests, said person has to be explicit about expectations that describe the internal state of the hook being tested. This implies checking for instance when a react query hook is being rendered, there's an assertion that said hook isn't loading anymore. In this PR you'd notice that this pattern has been adopted, with most existing assertions following an invocation of `waitForNextUpdate` being placed within a `waitFor` invocation. In some cases the replacement is simply a `waitFor(() => new Promise((resolve) => resolve(null)))` (many thanks to @kapral18, for point out exactly why this works), where this suffices the assertions that follow aren't placed within a waitFor so this PR doesn't get larger than it needs to be. It's also worth pointing out this PR might also contain changes to test and application code to improve said existing test. ### What to do next? 1. Review the changes in this PR. 2. If you think the changes are correct, approve the PR. ## Any questions? If you have any questions or need help with this PR, please leave comments in this PR. --------- Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Karen Grigoryan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>
kapral18
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2024
… setup (#201142) (#202600) In addition to changes introduced by #201142 Reasoning: This pull request includes changes to the `packages/kbn-test/src/jest/setup/react_testing_library.js` file to improve internal error logging suppression from react-testing-library. In particular, [this](https://github.com/testing-library/react-hooks-testing-library/blob/1e01273374af4e48a0feb1f2233bf6c76d742167/src/core/console.ts#L1-L4) suppression logic has been migrated to avoid breaking devUX expectations. Tested against #201142 code changes
kibanamachine
pushed a commit
to kibanamachine/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2024
… setup (elastic#201142) (elastic#202600) In addition to changes introduced by elastic#201142 Reasoning: This pull request includes changes to the `packages/kbn-test/src/jest/setup/react_testing_library.js` file to improve internal error logging suppression from react-testing-library. In particular, [this](https://github.com/testing-library/react-hooks-testing-library/blob/1e01273374af4e48a0feb1f2233bf6c76d742167/src/core/console.ts#L1-L4) suppression logic has been migrated to avoid breaking devUX expectations. Tested against elastic#201142 code changes (cherry picked from commit 3a6d27a)
kibanamachine
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2024
…ibrary setup (#201142) (#202600) (#204398) # Backport This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.x`: - [[React@18] Improve console.error suppression in react-testing-library setup (#201142) (#202600)](#202600) <!--- Backport version: 9.4.3 --> ### Questions ? Please refer to the [Backport tool documentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport) <!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Karen Grigoryan","email":"[email protected]"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2024-12-16T13:41:10Z","message":"[React@18] Improve console.error suppression in react-testing-library setup (#201142) (#202600)\n\nIn addition to changes introduced by #201142\r\n\r\nReasoning:\r\n\r\nThis pull request includes changes to the\r\n`packages/kbn-test/src/jest/setup/react_testing_library.js` file to\r\nimprove internal error logging suppression from react-testing-library.\r\nIn particular,\r\n[this](https://github.com/testing-library/react-hooks-testing-library/blob/1e01273374af4e48a0feb1f2233bf6c76d742167/src/core/console.ts#L1-L4)\r\nsuppression logic has been migrated to avoid breaking devUX\r\nexpectations.\r\n\r\nTested against #201142 code\r\nchanges","sha":"3a6d27af37c8ac2cdf730d206bd941554e729b9b","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.0.0$":"main","^v8.18.0$":"8.x","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:skip","v9.0.0","backport:prev-minor","React@18"],"title":"[React@18] Improve console.error suppression in react-testing-library setup (#201142)","number":202600,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/202600","mergeCommit":{"message":"[React@18] Improve console.error suppression in react-testing-library setup (#201142) (#202600)\n\nIn addition to changes introduced by #201142\r\n\r\nReasoning:\r\n\r\nThis pull request includes changes to the\r\n`packages/kbn-test/src/jest/setup/react_testing_library.js` file to\r\nimprove internal error logging suppression from react-testing-library.\r\nIn particular,\r\n[this](https://github.com/testing-library/react-hooks-testing-library/blob/1e01273374af4e48a0feb1f2233bf6c76d742167/src/core/console.ts#L1-L4)\r\nsuppression logic has been migrated to avoid breaking devUX\r\nexpectations.\r\n\r\nTested against #201142 code\r\nchanges","sha":"3a6d27af37c8ac2cdf730d206bd941554e729b9b"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.0.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/202600","number":202600,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[React@18] Improve console.error suppression in react-testing-library setup (#201142) (#202600)\n\nIn addition to changes introduced by #201142\r\n\r\nReasoning:\r\n\r\nThis pull request includes changes to the\r\n`packages/kbn-test/src/jest/setup/react_testing_library.js` file to\r\nimprove internal error logging suppression from react-testing-library.\r\nIn particular,\r\n[this](https://github.com/testing-library/react-hooks-testing-library/blob/1e01273374af4e48a0feb1f2233bf6c76d742167/src/core/console.ts#L1-L4)\r\nsuppression logic has been migrated to avoid breaking devUX\r\nexpectations.\r\n\r\nTested against #201142 code\r\nchanges","sha":"3a6d27af37c8ac2cdf730d206bd941554e729b9b"}}]}] BACKPORT--> Co-authored-by: Karen Grigoryan <[email protected]>
JoseLuisGJ
pushed a commit
to JoseLuisGJ/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2024
… setup (elastic#201142) (elastic#202600) In addition to changes introduced by elastic#201142 Reasoning: This pull request includes changes to the `packages/kbn-test/src/jest/setup/react_testing_library.js` file to improve internal error logging suppression from react-testing-library. In particular, [this](https://github.com/testing-library/react-hooks-testing-library/blob/1e01273374af4e48a0feb1f2233bf6c76d742167/src/core/console.ts#L1-L4) suppression logic has been migrated to avoid breaking devUX expectations. Tested against elastic#201142 code changes
CAWilson94
pushed a commit
to CAWilson94/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
… setup (elastic#201142) (elastic#202600) In addition to changes introduced by elastic#201142 Reasoning: This pull request includes changes to the `packages/kbn-test/src/jest/setup/react_testing_library.js` file to improve internal error logging suppression from react-testing-library. In particular, [this](https://github.com/testing-library/react-hooks-testing-library/blob/1e01273374af4e48a0feb1f2233bf6c76d742167/src/core/console.ts#L1-L4) suppression logic has been migrated to avoid breaking devUX expectations. Tested against elastic#201142 code changes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR migrates test suites that use
renderHookfrom the library@testing-library/react-hooksto adopt the equivalent and replacement ofrenderHookfrom the export that is now available from@testing-library/react. This work is required for the planned migration to react18.Context
In this PR, usages of
waitForNextUpdatethat previously could have been destructured fromrenderHookare now been replaced withwaitForexported from@testing-library/react, furthermorewaitForthat would also have been destructured from the same renderHook result is now been replaced with
waitForfrom the export of@testing-library/react.Why is
waitFora sufficient enough replacement forwaitForNextUpdate, and better for testing values subject to async computations?WaitFor will retry the provided callback if an error is returned, till the configured timeout elapses. By default the retry interval is
50mswith a timeout value of1000msthateffectively translates to at least 20 retries for assertions placed within waitFor. See https://testing-library.com/docs/dom-testing-library/api-async/#waitfor for more information.
This however means that for person's writing tests, said person has to be explicit about expectations that describe the internal state of the hook being tested.
This implies checking for instance when a react query hook is being rendered, there's an assertion that said hook isn't loading anymore.
In this PR you'd notice that this pattern has been adopted, with most existing assertions following an invocation of
waitForNextUpdatebeing placed within awaitForinvocation. In some cases the replacement is simply a
waitFor(() => new Promise((resolve) => resolve(null)))(many thanks to @kapral18, for point out exactly why this works),where this suffices the assertions that follow aren't placed within a waitFor so this PR doesn't get larger than it needs to be.
It's also worth pointing out this PR might also contain changes to test and application code to improve said existing test.
What to do next?
Any questions?
If you have any questions or need help with this PR, please leave comments in this PR.