Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Data Streams] Improve jest tests for bulk actions #204938

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ElenaStoeva
Copy link
Contributor

Follow-up to #203083

Summary

This PR improves the jest tests for bulk actions in data streams.

@ElenaStoeva ElenaStoeva self-assigned this Dec 19, 2024
@ElenaStoeva ElenaStoeva marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2025 15:42
@ElenaStoeva ElenaStoeva requested a review from a team as a code owner January 8, 2025 15:42
@ElenaStoeva ElenaStoeva added Feature:Index Management Index and index templates UI Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more labels Jan 8, 2025
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-management (Team:Kibana Management)

@ElenaStoeva ElenaStoeva added backport:prev-minor Backport to (8.x) the previous minor version (i.e. one version back from main) release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes labels Jan 8, 2025
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

@ElenaStoeva ElenaStoeva changed the title [Data Streams] Improve jest tests [Data Streams] Improve jest tests for bulk actions Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:prev-minor Backport to (8.x) the previous minor version (i.e. one version back from main) Feature:Index Management Index and index templates UI release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants