bump lock file for 8.17 #17015
bump lock file for 8.17 #17015
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| java | ||
| universal-java-11 | ||
| universal-java-17 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@robbavey spidey-senses:
- you introduced
LogStash::Bundler::genericise_platforma while ago, and hooked into it with the plugin manager's install/update/remove commands. I remember that the effect was to ensurejavaplatform was here and that the other specific ones were not present, but I don't recall why we needed to do it. - the current lockfile already has
universal-java-11(should it?), and this PR addsuniversal-java-11(does this have net-negative effect?).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think we want to add to it, and I'm surprised that universal-java-11 is there too. Given that it has been here since 8.14, it likely isn't doing any harm, but I don't see a good reason to add universal-java-17.
I don't recall the why - I will investigate when I have a moment today
|
💚 Build Succeeded
|
|
@yaauie please rerun to capture the latest patch releases of http/beats/tcp inputs that introduce proper naming of netty threads. |
| @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ GEM | |||
| lru_redux (~> 1.1.0) | |||
| logstash-filter-drop (3.0.5) | |||
| logstash-core-plugin-api (>= 1.60, <= 2.99) | |||
| logstash-filter-elastic_integration (8.17.0-java) | |||
| logstash-filter-elastic_integration (8.17.1-java) | |||
| logstash-core (>= 8.7.0) | |||
| logstash-core-plugin-api (>= 1.60, <= 2.99) | |||
| logstash-filter-elasticsearch (3.16.2) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| logstash-filter-elasticsearch (3.16.2) | |
| logstash-filter-elasticsearch (3.17.0) |
Can we please update the elasticsearch minor to include custom headers change
| java | ||
| universal-java-11 | ||
| universal-java-17 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think we want to add to it, and I'm surprised that universal-java-11 is there too. Given that it has been here since 8.14, it likely isn't doing any harm, but I don't see a good reason to add universal-java-17.
I don't recall the why - I will investigate when I have a moment today
|
superceded by #17024 |
No description provided.