Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wire up the "Forgot recovery key" button for the "Key storage out of sync" toast #29138

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

dbkr
Copy link
Member

@dbkr dbkr commented Jan 29, 2025

Fixes #29118

Checklist

  • Tests written for new code (and old code if feasible).
  • New or updated public/exported symbols have accurate TSDoc documentation.
  • Linter and other CI checks pass.
  • I have licensed the changes to Element by completing the Contributor License Agreement (CLA)

@dbkr dbkr marked this pull request as ready for review January 31, 2025 13:05
@dbkr dbkr requested review from a team as code owners January 31, 2025 13:05
Comment on lines 56 to 66
const recheckSetupRequired = useCallback(() => {
(async () => {
const crypto = matrixClient.getCrypto()!;
const isCrossSigningReady = await crypto.isCrossSigningReady();
if (isCrossSigningReady) {
setState("main");
} else {
setState("set_up_encryption");
}
})();
}, [matrixClient]);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm in favour to use a custom hook like useSetUpEncryptionRequired before. It helps the readability of the component imo

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something like this? I find the custom hook a bit awkward in this scenario since you have to pass a lot of functions around, but I don't mind too much.

Comment on lines 60 to 64
if (isCrossSigningReady) {
setState("main");
} else {
setState("set_up_encryption");
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if (isCrossSigningReady) {
setState("main");
} else {
setState("set_up_encryption");
}
if (isCrossSigningReady) setState("main");
else setState("set_up_encryption");

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd really rather not if at all possible: I find these line-ifs split over multiple lines very confusing, and I think our code style permits line ifs only if they're one single line.

import { registerAccountMas } from "../oidc";
import { deleteCachedSecrets } from "./utils";

test.use(masHomeserver);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test needs mas?

Comment on lines 20 to 44
test.beforeEach(async ({ page, app, mailpitClient }) => {
await page.goto("/#/login");
await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Continue" }).click();
await registerAccountMas(page, mailpitClient, "alice", "[email protected]", "Pa$sW0rD!");

await expect(page.getByRole("heading", { level: 1, name: "Welcome alice" })).toBeVisible();

// We won't be prompted for crypto setup unless we have na e2e room, so make one
await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Add room" }).click();
await page.getByRole("menuitem", { name: "New room" }).click();
await page.getByRole("textbox", { name: "Name" }).fill("Test room");
await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Create room" }).click();

// Now set up recovery (otherwise we'll delete the only copy of the secret)
await page.getByLabel("User menu").click();
await page.getByLabel("All settings").click();
await page.getByRole("tab", { name: "Encryption" }).click();
await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Set up recovery" }).click();
await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Continue" }).click();
recoveryKey = await page.getByTestId("recoveryKey").textContent();
await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Continue" }).click();
await page.getByRole("textbox", { name: "Enter recovery key" }).fill(recoveryKey);
await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Finish set up" }).click();

await expect(page.getByRole("button", { name: "Change recovery key" })).toBeVisible();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't we use crypto/utils#createBot to create a second session, bootstrap cross singing and create a recovery key?

crypto/utils#verifySession can be used to verify the current session too

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It took a bit but I think this is working with the bot client now.

Copy link
Member

@uhoreg uhoreg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From a crypto point of view, looks OK

playwright/e2e/crypto/toasts.spec.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dbkr dbkr added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 9657d39 Feb 4, 2025
31 checks passed
@dbkr dbkr deleted the dbkr/keystorage_outofsync_forgotpassword branch February 4, 2025 17:52
@dbkr dbkr added the backport staging Label to automatically backport PR to staging branch label Feb 4, 2025
RiotRobot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
…sync" toast (#29138)

* Wire up the "Forgot recovery key" button for the "Key storage out of sync" toast

* Unused import & fix test

* Test 'forgot' variant

* Fix dependencies

* Add more toast tests

* Unused import

* Test initialState in Encryption Tab

* Let's see if github has any more luck running this test than me

* Working playwright test with screenshot

* year

* Convert playwright test to use the bot client

* Disambiguate

Co-authored-by: Florian Duros <[email protected]>

* Add doc & do other part of rename

* Split out into custom hook

* Fix tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Florian Duros <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 9657d39)
@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Feb 5, 2025

"Wire up", but what actually happens? can we get some screenshots or something?

Comment on lines +35 to 38
* - "reset_identity_compromised": The panel to show when the user is resetting their identity, in te case where their key is compromised.
* - "reset_identity_forgot": The panel to show when the user is resetting their identity, in the case where they forgot their recovery key.
* - `secrets_not_cached`: The secrets are not cached locally. This can happen if we verified another device and secret-gossiping failed, or the other device itself lacked the secrets.
* If the "set_up_encryption" and "secrets_not_cached" conditions are both filled, "set_up_encryption" prevails.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what on earth is going on with the indentation here?

const checkEncryptionState = useCheckEncryptionState(setState);
interface EncryptionUserSettingsTabProps {
/**
* If the tab should start in a state other than the deasult
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

desault

export function EncryptionUserSettingsTab(): JSX.Element {
const [state, setState] = useState<State>("loading");
const checkEncryptionState = useCheckEncryptionState(setState);
interface EncryptionUserSettingsTabProps {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW, my reading of https://github.com/element-hq/element-web/blob/develop/code_style.md#react is that the Props interface should be called Props, but I'm perfectly happy for it to have a better name

@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ import { EncryptionUserSettingsTab } from "../settings/tabs/user/EncryptionUserS
interface IProps {
initialTabId?: UserTab;
showMsc4108QrCode?: boolean;
showResetIdentity?: boolean;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

documentation please. What does this do? Is false the same as undefined?

Comment on lines +147 to +152
const payload: OpenToTabPayload = {
action: Action.ViewUserSettings,
initialTabId: UserTab.Encryption,
props: { showResetIdentity: true },
};
defaultDispatcher.dispatch(payload);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a comment in here might not go amiss. What does this payload actually do?

@@ -32,23 +32,35 @@ import { RecoveryPanelOutOfSync } from "../../encryption/RecoveryPanelOutOfSync"
* This happens when the user has a recovery key and the user clicks on "Change recovery key" button of the RecoveryPanel.
* - "set_recovery_key": The panel to show when the user is setting up their recovery key.
* This happens when the user doesn't have a key a recovery key and the user clicks on "Set up recovery key" button of the RecoveryPanel.
* - "reset_identity": The panel to show when the user is resetting their identity.
* - `secrets_not_cached`: The secrets are not cached locally. This can happen if we verified another device and secret-gossiping failed, or the other device itself lacked the secrets.
* - "reset_identity_compromised": The panel to show when the user is resetting their identity, in te case where their key is compromised.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

te

Comment on lines +29 to +35
/**
* The variant of the panel to show. We show more warnings in the 'compromised' variant (no use in showing a user this
* warning if they have to reset because they no longer have their key)
* "compromised" is shown when the user chooses 'reset' explicitly in settings, usually because they believe their
* identity has been compromised.
* "forgot" is shown when the user has just forgotten their passphrase.
*/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Formatting is weird here. Newlines don't do anything in tsdoc; either commit to new paragraphs with a blank line, or match the generated output by removing the linebreaks (presumably the former in this case). You can't just sit on the fence.

Comment on lines +218 to +221
const useSecurityKey = page.locator(".mx_Dialog").getByRole("button", { name: "use your Security Key" });
if (await useSecurityKey.isVisible()) {
await useSecurityKey.click();
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

comment would be good here. Why is this sometimes necessary and sometimes not?

import { test, expect } from "../../element-web-test";
import { createBot, deleteCachedSecrets, logIntoElement } from "./utils";

test.describe("Key storage out of sync toast", () => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(don't we already have some tests for this toast somewhere else?)

});

test("should prompt for recovery key if 'enter recovery key' pressed", { tag: "@screenshot" }, async ({ page }) => {
// Need to wait for 2 to appear since playwright only evaluates 'first()' initially, so the waiting won't work
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to wait for 2 to appear since playwright only evaluates 'first()' initially, so the waiting won't work

wat?

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
…Key storage out of sync" toast (#29190)

* Wire up the "Forgot recovery key" button for the "Key storage out of sync" toast (#29138)

* Wire up the "Forgot recovery key" button for the "Key storage out of sync" toast

* Unused import & fix test

* Test 'forgot' variant

* Fix dependencies

* Add more toast tests

* Unused import

* Test initialState in Encryption Tab

* Let's see if github has any more luck running this test than me

* Working playwright test with screenshot

* year

* Convert playwright test to use the bot client

* Disambiguate

Co-authored-by: Florian Duros <[email protected]>

* Add doc & do other part of rename

* Split out into custom hook

* Fix tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Florian Duros <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 9657d39)

* Update fetchdep.sh to understand merge queues

---------

Co-authored-by: David Baker <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Michael Telatynski <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport staging Label to automatically backport PR to staging branch T-Defect
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Your key storage is out of sync - Forgot recovery key? - After click silently disappears
4 participants