-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Linux Safety Architecture methodology #9
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
reiterative
commented
May 25, 2022
- Based on methodology proposed in Safety Architecture WG minutes WW21
* From Safety Architecture WG minutes WW21 Signed-off-by: Paul Albertella <[email protected]>
dd6ab94
to
28d76d8
Compare
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | |||
# Kernel Safety Architecture Methodology |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
from Gab: I think we need to align this methodology with the pull request: #3
* Functionalities allocated to each functional block (NOTE: only functionalities that are meaningful for fulfilling the allocated requirement) | ||
* For each of the identified functionalities the role of the interfaces shall be described (under which conditions they are invoked) | ||
* Safety Analysis: Do an STPA analysis and define derived safety requirements for each of the functional blocks as in 3) | ||
* Iterate: Evaluate functional blocks complexity vs allocated safety requirements and eventually iterate back in 1) or stop here if not needed (complexity is acceptable) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From Gab: the stop criteria should be rephrased as "the are comprehensive and complete architectural mitigation measure to satisfy the allocated safety requirement or the complexity is acceptable"
|
||
* Safety Requirement Definition: an initial safety requirement must be allocated to the Kernel as a whole from the safety concept of domain specific WGs. | ||
* Scope Identification: given a safety requirement, the code functionally supporting such requirement must be comprehensively identified | ||
* Initial partitioning into functional blocks: one or more functional blocks in the scope of the code above must be identified and for each of these blocks we should describe: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
from Gab: is the name "functional block" correct or it should be replaced by "controllers" (to meet the STPA terminology)?