Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

addition of plugin template #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cipher-rc5
Copy link

@cipher-rc5 cipher-rc5 commented Jan 14, 2025

feature request: plugin template addition

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Dependencies

    • Added @elizaos/client-direct (v0.1.7)
    • Added @elizaos/core (v0.1.7)
  • New Features

    • Introduced a new template plugin with action, evaluator, provider, and type definitions
    • Added comprehensive configuration and data handling interfaces
  • Documentation

    • Created a new _llm.txt file for AI-assisted code review and analysis

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Walkthrough

A new template plugin for ElizaOS has been introduced, consisting of multiple TypeScript files in the src/template/ directory. The plugin includes an action, evaluator, provider, and associated types. Two new dependencies, @elizaos/client-direct and @elizaos/core, were added to the package.json. A comprehensive _llm.txt file was also created to represent the entire codebase for AI processing.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Added dependencies: @elizaos/[email protected], @elizaos/[email protected]
src/template/_llm.txt New file for AI-friendly codebase representation
src/template/action.ts Added templateAction with validation and handler methods
src/template/evaluator.ts Added templateEvaluator with validation logic
src/template/index.ts Created plugin configuration with action and evaluator
src/template/provider.ts Implemented provider with data retrieval method
src/template/types.ts Defined new TypeScript interfaces for plugin components

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Action
    participant Evaluator
    participant Provider
    
    User->>Action: Trigger action
    Action->>Evaluator: Validate message
    Evaluator-->>Action: Validation result
    Action->>Provider: Retrieve data
    Provider-->>Action: Return data/response
    Action->>User: Process and respond
Loading

Poem

🚀 New plugin arrives with grace,
Bytes dancing in digital space
TypeScript whispers, dependencies shine
ElizaOS grows, line by line!
A template of wonder, code so bright 🌟

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 12

🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
src/template/_llm.txt (2)

135-138: Enhance validation criteria.

The 'required_field' check is hardcoded. Consider:

  1. Making validation criteria configurable
  2. Adding multiple validation rules
  3. Providing detailed validation feedback

224-227: Strengthen type definitions.

The configuration and data interfaces are too generic:

  • Add specific field types
  • Consider using union types for constrained values
  • Add JSDoc comments for better documentation
 export interface ProviderConfig {
+  /** Required configuration fields */
   required: { 
-    field: string 
+    field: string;
+    triggerPattern: RegExp;
+    maxTextLength: number;
   };
   optional?: { 
-    field?: string 
+    timeout?: number;
+    retryCount?: number;
   };
 }

Also applies to: 229-232

src/template/types.ts (2)

15-21: Consolidate duplicate content interfaces.

ActionContent and EvalContent have identical structure. Consider using a single interface.

-export interface ActionContent extends Content {
-  text: string;
-}
-
-export interface EvalContent extends Content {
-  text: string;
-}
+export interface TextContent extends Content {
+  text: string;
+}
+
+export type ActionContent = TextContent;
+export type EvalContent = TextContent;

23-32: Create a common response type.

EvalResponse and ProviderResponse follow similar patterns. Consider creating a base response type.

+interface BaseResponse {
+  success: boolean;
+  error?: string;
+}
+
-export interface EvalResponse {
-  success: boolean;
-  response: string;
+export interface EvalResponse extends BaseResponse {
+  response: string;
 }
 
-export interface ProviderResponse {
-  success: boolean;
+export interface ProviderResponse extends BaseResponse {
   data?: ProviderData;
-  error?: string;
 }
src/template/evaluator.ts (2)

10-14: Improve example documentation.

Replace placeholder examples with realistic use cases.

 examples: [{
-  context: 'Example context for validation',
-  messages: [{ user: '{{user1}}', content: { text: 'Example content to validate' } }],
-  outcome: 'Expected validation outcome'
+  context: 'Validating a command message',
+  messages: [{ user: '{{user1}}', content: { text: '!status check system' } }],
+  outcome: 'Command validated successfully'
 }],

36-38: Enhance error handling.

Consider adding error codes for better error handling by consumers.

+export enum EvalErrorCode {
+  INVALID_INPUT = 'INVALID_INPUT',
+  VALIDATION_FAILED = 'VALIDATION_FAILED',
+}
+
 catch (error) {
-  return { success: false, response: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Validation failed' };
+  return {
+    success: false,
+    response: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Validation failed',
+    errorCode: error instanceof Error ? EvalErrorCode.VALIDATION_FAILED : EvalErrorCode.INVALID_INPUT
+  };
 }
src/template/action.ts (2)

9-14: Add meaningful description and examples.

Replace placeholder text with actual descriptions and real-world usage examples.


25-38: Improve error handling and logging.

Add proper error logging and more descriptive error messages.

     try {
       const response = await provider.get(runtime, message, state);
 
       if (!response.success || !response.data) {
+        runtime.logger.error('Provider request failed', { error: response.error });
         return `Error message template. ${response.error || ''}`;
       }
 
       const data: ProviderData = response.data;
       return `Response template using ${data.someField}`;
     } catch (error) {
+      runtime.logger.error('Handler execution failed', { error });
       return `Error handling template: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error'}`;
     }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e5bf033 and 387fc90.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/template/_llm.txt (1 hunks)
  • src/template/action.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/template/evaluator.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/template/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/template/provider.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/template/types.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
src/template/_llm.txt

[uncategorized] ~100-~100: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...or.message : 'Unknown error'}`; } } }; ================ File: evaluator.ts...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~144-~144: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...essage : 'Validation failed' }; } }, alwaysRun: true }; ===============...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[formatting] ~189-~189: Did you mean “?”
Context: ...=> { try { if (!providerConfig?.required?.field) { throw new Err...

(MULTIPLE_PUNCTATION_MARKS_1)


[formatting] ~189-~189: Did you mean “?”
Context: ...ry { if (!providerConfig?.required?.field) { throw new Error('Requir...

(MULTIPLE_PUNCTATION_MARKS_1)


[uncategorized] ~210-~210: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... 'Provider operation failed' }; } } }; export const initializeProvider = (...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/template/_llm.txt (2)

69-76: Replace placeholder values with meaningful content.

The action configuration contains generic placeholders that need to be replaced:

  • 'TEMPLATE_ACTION' should reflect the actual action name
  • Description needs to be specific about the action's purpose
  • Similes should list genuinely related actions
  • Examples should demonstrate real use cases

158-164: Update plugin metadata.

The plugin configuration needs specific details:

  • Replace 'template-plugin' with actual name
  • Add meaningful description
  • Consider if providers array is needed
src/template/index.ts (1)

17-23: Implement provider initialization.

Either implement or remove the commented provider initialization code.

If provider functionality is needed, uncomment and implement. Otherwise, remove the commented code.

package.json (1)

30-31: Review dependency strategy.

The project has both @ai16z and @elizaos packages. Consider:

  1. Are you migrating from @ai16z to @elizaos?
  2. Should version ranges be more flexible (e.g., ^0.1.7)?
✅ Verification successful

Migration strategy confirmed - proceed with caution

The codebase shows a controlled migration from @ai16z to @elizaos, starting with the template system. Fixed versions are appropriate during this transition phase.

  • ✓ Template system: Migrated to @elizaos
  • ⚠️ Plugins: Still on @ai16z
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for mixed usage of @ai16z and @elizaos
rg -l "@ai16z|@elizaos" src/

Length of output: 1010


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for actual imports and usage patterns
rg "@(ai16z|elizaos)" -A 2 src/

Length of output: 7749

import { IAgentRuntime, Memory, Provider, State } from '@elizaos/core';
import { ProviderConfig, ProviderData, ProviderResponse } from './types.ts';

let providerConfig: ProviderConfig;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid mutable global state.

Using a global mutable providerConfig is risky. Consider:

  1. Using dependency injection
  2. Making the provider stateless
  3. Passing config through the constructor
-let providerConfig: ProviderConfig;
+export class TemplateProvider implements Provider {
+  constructor(private readonly config: ProviderConfig) {}
+}

Also applies to: 213-215

Comment on lines +195 to +198
const dataMatch = content.text.match(/pattern_to_extract_data/i);
if (!dataMatch) {
throw new Error('Required data not found in message');
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Make pattern matching configurable.

The regex pattern is hardcoded. Consider:

  1. Moving patterns to configuration
  2. Supporting multiple patterns
  3. Adding pattern validation

Comment on lines +121 to +128
validate: async (runtime: IAgentRuntime, message: Memory, state?: State): Promise<boolean> => {
try {
const content = message.content as EvalContent;
return typeof content.text === 'string';
} catch {
return false;
}
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Strengthen the validation logic.

Current validation only checks if text exists. Consider adding more robust validation:

  • Content format validation
  • Length constraints
  • Pattern matching
   validate: async (runtime: IAgentRuntime, message: Memory, state?: State): Promise<boolean> => {
     try {
       const content = message.content as EvalContent;
-      return typeof content.text === 'string';
+      return typeof content.text === 'string' 
+        && content.text.length > 0 
+        && content.text.length <= MAX_TEXT_LENGTH;
     } catch {
       return false;
     }
   },

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +78 to +85
validate: async (runtime: IAgentRuntime, message: Memory, state?: State): Promise<boolean> => {
try {
const content = message.content as ActionContent;
return (typeof content.text === 'string' && content.text.toLowerCase().includes('trigger_word'));
} catch {
return false;
}
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid hardcoded validation triggers.

The validation logic uses a hardcoded 'trigger_word'. Consider:

  1. Making the trigger configurable via ProviderConfig
  2. Using pattern matching or regex for more flexible validation
-      return (typeof content.text === 'string' && content.text.toLowerCase().includes('trigger_word'));
+      const triggerPattern = providerConfig.triggerPattern || 'trigger_word';
+      return (typeof content.text === 'string' && content.text.toLowerCase().includes(triggerPattern));

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +5 to +8
export interface ProviderConfig {
required: { field: string };
optional?: { field?: string };
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use descriptive field names and add documentation.

Replace generic 'field' names with descriptive ones and add JSDoc comments explaining the configuration purpose.

+/**
+ * Configuration for the template provider
+ */
 export interface ProviderConfig {
-  required: { field: string };
-  optional?: { field?: string };
+  required: { apiKey: string };
+  optional?: { endpoint?: string };
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
export interface ProviderConfig {
required: { field: string };
optional?: { field?: string };
}
/**
* Configuration for the template provider
*/
export interface ProviderConfig {
required: { apiKey: string };
optional?: { endpoint?: string };
}

}

// Extract data from message content
const content = message.content as { text: string };
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use type guard instead of type assertion.

Replace unsafe type assertion with a type guard function.

+function isTextContent(content: unknown): content is { text: string } {
+  return typeof content === 'object' && content !== null && 'text' in content &&
+    typeof (content as { text: unknown }).text === 'string';
+}

-const content = message.content as { text: string };
+if (!isTextContent(message.content)) {
+  throw new Error('Invalid message content');
+}
+const content = message.content;

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +31 to +33
if (!text.includes('required_field')) {
return { success: false, response: 'Missing required field' };
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Make validation criteria configurable.

Hardcoded 'required_field' check should be configurable.

+interface ValidatorConfig {
+  requiredFields: string[];
+}
+
+export const createTemplateEvaluator = (config: ValidatorConfig): Evaluator => ({
+  // ... other properties
   handler: async (runtime: IAgentRuntime, message: Memory, state?: State): Promise<EvalResponse> => {
-    if (!text.includes('required_field')) {
+    if (!config.requiredFields.some(field => text.includes(field))) {

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +7 to +13
export const templatePlugin: Plugin = {
name: 'template-plugin',
description: 'Description of plugin functionality',
actions: [templateAction],
evaluators: [templateEvaluator],
providers: [] // Only add providers array if your plugin needs them
};
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance plugin metadata.

Add version and more descriptive metadata.

 export const templatePlugin: Plugin = {
   name: 'template-plugin',
-  description: 'Description of plugin functionality',
+  version: '1.0.0',
+  description: 'A template plugin demonstrating basic ElizaOS plugin structure',
+  author: 'Your Name <[email protected]>',
   actions: [templateAction],
   evaluators: [templateEvaluator],
   providers: [] // Only add providers array if your plugin needs them
 };
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
export const templatePlugin: Plugin = {
name: 'template-plugin',
description: 'Description of plugin functionality',
actions: [templateAction],
evaluators: [templateEvaluator],
providers: [] // Only add providers array if your plugin needs them
};
export const templatePlugin: Plugin = {
name: 'template-plugin',
version: '1.0.0',
description: 'A template plugin demonstrating basic ElizaOS plugin structure',
author: 'Your Name <[email protected]>',
actions: [templateAction],
evaluators: [templateEvaluator],
providers: [] // Only add providers array if your plugin needs them
};

// src/template/action.ts

import { Action, IAgentRuntime, Memory, State } from '@elizaos/core';
import { provider } from './provider.ts';
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove .ts extension from import.

The .ts extension in import statements can cause issues with bundlers and production builds.

-import { provider } from './provider.ts';
+import { provider } from './provider';
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
import { provider } from './provider.ts';
import { provider } from './provider';

Comment on lines +18 to +19
const content = message.content as ActionContent;
return (typeof content.text === 'string' && content.text.toLowerCase().includes('trigger_word'));
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add type guard and make trigger word configurable.

Two improvements needed:

  1. Add type guard before casting content
  2. Make 'trigger_word' configurable through runtime config
-      const content = message.content as ActionContent;
+      if (!message.content || typeof message.content !== 'object') {
+        return false;
+      }
+      const content = message.content as ActionContent;
+      const triggerWord = runtime.config?.triggerWord || 'trigger_word';
-      return (typeof content.text === 'string' && content.text.toLowerCase().includes('trigger_word'));
+      return (typeof content.text === 'string' && content.text.toLowerCase().includes(triggerWord));

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant