Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix readme #165

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

fix readme #165

merged 7 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

humanagent
Copy link
Collaborator

@humanagent humanagent commented Dec 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Rebranding of the project to "XMTP AI" with updated project focus on AI tools for developers.
    • New build scripts added for xmtp and xmtp-client packages.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README to reflect new branding and project description.
    • Removed the "Open Frames" section from the documentation.
  • Chores

    • Project name updated in configuration files to align with the new branding.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 19, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
message-kit-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 19, 2024 11:10pm
message-kit-frames ❌ Failed (Inspect) Dec 19, 2024 11:10pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@humanagent has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d4e6123 and 7858d8a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/create-message-kit/README.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/docs/README.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/docs/pages/plugins/xmtp.mdx (1 hunks)
  • packages/message-kit/README.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/xmtp-client/README.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/xmtp/README.md (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request represents a significant rebranding of the project from "MessageKit" to "XMTP AI". The changes primarily focus on updating the README.md and package.json files to reflect the new project direction. The documentation has been modified to emphasize AI tools for developers, with the removal of the "Open Frames" section. The package.json file has been updated with new project name, build scripts, and package references, indicating a strategic shift in the project's focus and structure.

Changes

File Changes
README.md - Rebranded from "MessageKit" to "XMTP AI"
- Updated introductory description
- Removed "Open Frames" section
package.json - Project name changed from message-kit-monorepo to xmtp-ai
- Added build scripts for xmtp and xmtp-client packages
- Updated CLI script path

Possibly related PRs

  • Frame update #122: Previous documentation updates for MessageKit, providing historical context for the rebranding
  • 1.2.32 #160: Updates to @xmtp/message-kit package configuration, related to package restructuring

Suggested reviewers

  • neekolas

Poem

🐰 From MessageKit to XMTP AI's might,
A rabbit's leap into a brighter light!
Rebranding scripts with turbo's grace,
New packages dancing in this space.
Code transforms, a technological flight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
README.md (1)

1-3: Consider expanding the project description

The title and introduction are quite brief for a significant rebranding. Consider adding:

  • Project's main features or benefits
  • Target audience
  • Quick start guide or installation instructions
package.json (1)

2-2: PR scope exceeds "fix readme"

The change from "message-kit-monorepo" to "xmtp-ai" represents a significant rebranding, not just a readme fix. This should be reflected in:

  • PR title and description
  • Comprehensive documentation updates
  • Migration guide for existing users

Consider:

  1. Breaking this into smaller, focused PRs
  2. Adding a migration guide
  3. Updating the PR title to reflect the scope
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b7a6c9 and d4e6123.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (1)

13-13: ⚠️ Potential issue

Maintain consistent branding in documentation references

The docs package description still references "MessageKit" while the project has been rebranded to "XMTP AI".

-[`docs`](/packages/docs): Documentation for MessageKit
+[`docs`](/packages/docs): Documentation for XMTP AI

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

package.json (2)

Line range hint 11-24: Ensure consistent package naming across build scripts

The build scripts mix old and new branding:

  • Some scripts reference "message-kit"
  • Others reference "xmtp" and "xmtp-client"

This inconsistency could lead to confusion and maintenance issues.

Let's verify the existence and naming of these packages:

Consider updating all references consistently:

-  "build:message-kit": "turbo run build --filter=./packages/message-kit --force",
+  "build:xmtp": "turbo run build --filter=./packages/xmtp --force",

Line range hint 28-31: Verify test coverage for rebranded packages

Several test scripts reference the old package names. Ensure test coverage is maintained for the rebranded packages.

Let's check for test files:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the test coverage by examining the test file content and searching for any references to package names.


Let me check the content of the other test files to get a complete picture of the test coverage.


Based on the test files examination, I can now provide a final response:

Test coverage appears adequate for rebranded packages

The test files show proper coverage with updated package references:

  • The main XMTP client tests in packages/xmtp/tests/Client.test.ts use the rebranded xmtp import
  • Message Kit package has comprehensive test coverage across multiple features:
    • Frame handling
    • Intent processing
    • Message parsing
    • Prompt handling

All tests are using the current package names and no references to old package names were found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check test coverage for rebranded packages
fd -t f "test" packages/xmtp packages/xmtp-client

Length of output: 84


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of test file and search for package references
cat packages/xmtp/tests/Client.test.ts

# Search for any test-related files in the entire repo
fd -t f "(test|spec)\.(js|ts|tsx)$"

# Search for package imports in test files
rg "from ['\"]@xmtp" -A 2 -g "*.test.ts" -g "*.spec.ts"

Length of output: 1805


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of other test files
cat packages/message-kit/tests/Frames.test.ts
cat packages/message-kit/tests/Intent.test.ts
cat packages/message-kit/tests/Parsing.test.ts
cat packages/message-kit/tests/Prompt.test.ts

# Search for package imports and references in all test files
rg "from ['\"]xmtp" -A 2 -g "*.test.ts"

Length of output: 8286

README.md Outdated
@@ -9,14 +9,10 @@ This is the official repository for [MessageKit](https://message-kit.org/). Powe
- [`message-kit`](/packages/message-kit): A kit for quickly building messaging apps
- [`create-message-kit`](/packages/create-message-kit): A CLI for creating new apps easily
- [`framekit`](/packages/framekit): A suite for backend frames
- ['xmtp](/packages/xmtp/): A secure agent sdk
- ['xmtp`](/packages/xmtp/): A secure agent sdk
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix markdown syntax error in package link

There's a syntax error in the xmtp package link. The opening quote is incorrect.

-['xmtp`](/packages/xmtp/): A secure agent sdk
+[`xmtp`](/packages/xmtp/): A secure agent sdk
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- ['xmtp`](/packages/xmtp/): A secure agent sdk
[`xmtp`](/packages/xmtp/): A secure agent sdk

@humanagent humanagent marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2024 23:15
@humanagent humanagent requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2024 23:15
@humanagent humanagent merged commit 278df3e into main Dec 19, 2024
5 checks passed
@humanagent humanagent deleted the 1.3.0 branch December 19, 2024 23:15
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 28, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant