fix: Fix peer check job not actually starting

[sanjayprabhu]

Motivation

The periodic peer check job was not actually started. So if bootstrap failed for any reason, the hub would never retry.

Change Summary

Describe the changes being made in 1-2 concise sentences.

Merge Checklist

Choose all relevant options below by adding an x now or at any time before submitting for review

• PR title adheres to the conventional commits standard
• PR has a changeset
• PR has been tagged with a change label(s) (i.e. documentation, feature, bugfix, or chore)
• PR includes documentation if necessary.
• All commits have been signed

Additional Context

If this is a relatively large or complex change, provide more details here that will help reviewers

---

PR-Codex overview

Focus of the PR:

Fixing the issue where the peer check job was not starting properly.

Detailed summary:

• Fixed the PeriodicPeerCheckScheduler component name in the logger.
• Added a check to only connect to bootstrap peers if there are no existing peers.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: c37b513

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
@farcaster/hubble	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
hub-monorepo	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Nov 3, 2023 6:19pm

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Files	Coverage Δ
apps/hubble/src/network/p2p/gossipNode.ts	84.61% <100.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
apps/hubble/src/network/p2p/periodicPeerCheck.ts	50.00% <0.00%> (+8.82%)	⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!.