Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Difference in the mean IoU on test dataset #43

Open
Sreeni1204 opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Difference in the mean IoU on test dataset #43

Sreeni1204 opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Sreeni1204
Copy link

Sreeni1204 commented Sep 2, 2021

Hello,

Thanks for the good work.

I have a few questions to ask.

  1. Is the step "1-15" under task "15-5" and step "1-15" under task "15-5s" the same? If yes, why is there a difference in the performance or mean IoU values in the paper?

  2. I performed the FT and MiB experiments, and the mean IoU is differing too much from the one in the paper. The difference between the command given by you and the one I am using is that I have a single CUDA device and reduced the batch size to 12.

Thanks and regards,
Sreeni...

@fcdl94
Copy link
Owner

fcdl94 commented Sep 22, 2021

Hello @Sreeni1204,

  1. Yes, the model is the same. However, the performance is reported after the last incremental step is done. Thus, doing one incremental step or doing multiple give indeed different results.
  2. Well, if you reduce the batch size, try to decrease also the learning rate (our empirical rule is to divide the LR by the same rate - in your case, halve it). Remember also that experiments in the 15-1 scenario used a loss_kd value of 100, while for all the other settings we used 10.

Sorry for the late answer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants