-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Exclude non active crums siblings #887
Comments
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 21, 2019
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 21, 2019
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 21, 2019
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 21, 2019
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 21, 2019
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 22, 2019
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 22, 2019
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 22, 2019
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 25, 2019
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 25, 2019
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2019
* #887 Test if all category.get_siblings are active * #887 Rm duplicated categories matrix test * #887 Remove some code doubling for catalog pagination tests * #887 Test if all crumb siblings are active * #887 Subtask not solved bug investigation * #887 Fix siblings test to identify bug * #887 Fix siblings test to identify bug * #887 Review#1 fixes. Rm redundant subtask, simplify test query and condition
pretty the same issue bothers us again. I'll write the new test to identify this issue. Small exploration at the production DB:
|
Covered the case with test, but it won't help. Tried to remove parent 'catalog' page for the problem non-active category, but got error
|
duker33
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
related PR now contains failed siblings mech prof test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It's screen from seo guys
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: