Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update F(E)VM FIP Status #1067

Merged

Conversation

Stebalien
Copy link
Member

  1. Move FIP-0030 to Final (already marked as Final in the README). I've also updated the text to btter reflect what was actually implemented.
  2. Move FIP-0031 to Final (already marked as Final in the README).
  3. Move FIP-0032 to Final (already marked as Final in the README).
  4. Withdraw FIP-0037 (this FIP was replaced by FIP-0054 and FIP-0057).
  5. Move FIP-0054 and FIP-0057 to Final (already marked as Final in the README).

This has since been shipped in the network, but the FIP language makes
it sound like native Wasm smart contracts are supported. This patch
updates the FIP to make it clear that native Wasm smart contracts were
not implemented.
This FIP was replaced by FIP-0054 and FIP-0057.
These were both implemented as a part of FEVM
FIPS/fip-0030.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Adrian Lanzafame <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@jsoares jsoares left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have mixed feelings on the substantive updates to FIP-0030, but am inclined to agree that reflecting the reality of what was implemented is more important than preserving what was proposed. Nevertheless, I think it's worth hearing from other editors.

FIPS/fip-0030.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
FIPS/fip-0030.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jsoares jsoares merged commit 56863b1 into filecoin-project:master Sep 18, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants