-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Corrected typos #1114
Corrected typos #1114
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you.
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ The ConsensusLab team explored potential mitigation strategies and narrowed down | |||
|
|||
--- | |||
|
|||
**Considering the trade-offs, the ConsensusLab team would like to propose the use of synchronous consistent broadcast as the mitigation strategy** (i.e., the last of the three proposed mitigations). The benefits of easy adoption due to only "behind the scence changes" and no <!--fork-->Filecoin-upgrade required, outweigh the shortcomings (timing assumptions). Moreover, even if the timing assumptions are violated, the consistency degrades gracefully (that is, a slightly longer than expected gossip delay would lead to only a small amount of equivocating blocks being accepted rather than to a "cliff phenomenon" where all equivocating blocks are accepted). Also, using the synchronous approach does not require significant changes to the [underlying broadcast protocol](https://blog.ipfs.tech/gossipsubv1.1-eval-report-and-security-audit/), which is already well tested and has built-in failure detecting mechnisms. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"behind the scene"
you are welcome |
can you merge it ? it will help me in growing up my github portfolio for differ. crypto projects. thank you |
Please fix the "behind the scene" line, then we will happily merge. |
"behind the scene" correction
Fixed the "behind the scene" line. Can you please check it? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typical usage would argue for a plural, "scenes", but I don't think it really matters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might as well finish the job...
Changes made in:
/FRCs/frc-0087.md ("referensing" → "referencing")
/FRCs/frc-0087.md ("specifing" → "specifying")
/FRCs/frc-0087.md ("specifing" → "specifying")
/FRCs/frc-0051.md ("acording" → "according")
/FRCs/frc-0051.md ("effectivelly" → "effectively")
/FRCs/frc-0051.md ("witholding" → "withholding")
/FRCs/frc-0051.md ("percieved" → "perceived")
/FRCs/frc-0051.md ("targetted" → "targeted")
/FRCs/frc-0051.md ("targetted" → "targeted")
/FRCs/frc-0051.md ("scence" → "scene, science, sense")