You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should we have better metadata support for the GLM objects? in particular, with predict, it feels weird to pass the glm object a pynapple object with columns and then... drop the columns. would be nice to grab columns if available (which would work with pynapple, pandas, etc.), and similarly for rate.
(columns here are neuron labels)
could also make them optional arguments to the function? but that starts to feel cluttered
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should we have better metadata support for the GLM objects? in particular, with predict, it feels weird to pass the glm object a pynapple object with columns and then... drop the columns. would be nice to grab columns if available (which would work with pynapple, pandas, etc.), and similarly for rate.
(columns here are neuron labels)
could also make them optional arguments to the function? but that starts to feel cluttered
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: