processor_attributes: add support to handle Logs metadata (WIP) #8494
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Silva <[email protected]>
The following patch splits the logic of the plugin that originally only supports Traces attributes. Now certain functions has been moved to a traces interface and some cleanup has been done in the attributes one. This refactoring is still work in process. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Silva <[email protected]>
|
this functionality is now part of the new content_modifier processor |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The following PR implements support to modify Logs metadata as logs attributes. The previous implementation only support traces, this patch extends it functionality.
note: this is still work in process and as of now there is only logic split with CFL and inside the processor_attributes plugin.
Fluent Bit is licensed under Apache 2.0, by submitting this pull request I understand that this code will be released under the terms of that license.