-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 660
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added the documentation about uniqueness of execution IDs #5828
Added the documentation about uniqueness of execution IDs #5828
Conversation
…t domain Signed-off-by: Murdock9803 <[email protected]>
@davidmirror-ops @samhita-alla I tried to incorporate the required changes, should I change the position of added text or anything ? Please have a look at the Pull Request 🙌 |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5828 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.35% 34.70% -1.66%
==========================================
Files 1304 991 -313
Lines 110147 85287 -24860
==========================================
- Hits 40041 29595 -10446
+ Misses 65939 52753 -13186
+ Partials 4167 2939 -1228
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉 |
I am really grateful to have my first PR merged at this organization, and excited for future ones 🙌 ❤️ |
@Murdock9803 remember to fill out this form before Oct 31 to register your contributions for swag. Thank you! |
Tracking issue
Closes #4684
Why are the changes needed?
The executions has documentation about Execution and their Typical Flow. As suggested in issue #4684, there should be information about the execution IDs as well.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR simply adds an additional line in the documentation about execution IDs.
How was this patch tested?
This was a simple and straightforward Doc change, so right syntax is kept in mind and checked.
Check all the applicable boxes
Related PRs
Docs link