Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MODTLR-141: Create shadow instance in primary request tenant #104

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Feb 18, 2025

Conversation

OleksandrVidinieiev
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

MODTLR-141

Approach

How does this change fulfill the purpose?

TODOS and Open Questions

  • Use GitHub checklists. When solved, check the box and explain the answer.

Learning

Describe the research stage. Add links to blog posts, patterns, libraries or addons used to solve this problem.

@OleksandrVidinieiev OleksandrVidinieiev merged commit fd6a42a into master Feb 18, 2025
7 checks passed
@OleksandrVidinieiev OleksandrVidinieiev deleted the MODTLR-141-shadow-instance branch February 18, 2025 09:35
OleksandrVidinieiev added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2025
* MODTLR-141 Create shadow instance in primary request tenant

* MODTLR-141 Replace InventoryItem with Item

* MODTLR-141 Share instance through central tenant

* MODTLR-141 Fix TenantContext constructor

* MODTLR-141 Call instance sharing API in central tenant without system user

* MODTLR-141 Call instance sharing API in central tenant without system user

* MODTLR-141 Log and throw sharing error

* MODTLR-141 Call instance sharing API in target tenant

* MODTLR-141 Call instance sharing API in target tenant

* MODTLR-141 Refactoring

* MODTLR-141 Fix build

* MODTLR-141 Extend test

* MODTLR-141 Remove redundant import

* MODTLR-141 Fix ecs-tlr.yaml

* MODTLR-141 Tests for ConsortiumService

* MODTLR-141 Refactoring ConsortiumService

* MODTLR-141 Refactoring

* MODTLR-141 Unit test for instance sharing failure

* MODTLR-141 Remove instance sharing permission from module permissions

(cherry picked from commit fd6a42a)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants