Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UISACQCOMP-201: ECS - clear Location/Holding field when affiliation selected #798

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

alisher-epam
Copy link
Contributor

@alisher-epam alisher-epam commented Jul 24, 2024

Purpose

UISACQCOMP-201: ECS - clear Location/Holding field when affiliation selected

Approach

Screen.Recording.2024-07-24.at.13.26.22.mp4

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

@alisher-epam alisher-epam self-assigned this Jul 24, 2024
@alisher-epam alisher-epam requested a review from a team July 24, 2024 10:28
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Jest Unit Test Statistics

    1 files  ±0  211 suites  ±0   3m 49s ⏱️ -7s
531 tests ±0  529 ✔️ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
534 runs  ±0  532 ✔️ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 9570c75. ± Comparison against base commit f3f5b60.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 24, 2024

BigTest Unit Test Statistics

0 tests  ±0   0 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ±0 

Results for commit 9570c75. ± Comparison against base commit f3f5b60.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ export const FieldHolding = ({
const locationLabel = locationLabelId ? <FormattedMessage id={locationLabelId} /> : '';
const holdingLabel = labelId ? <FormattedMessage id={labelId} /> : '';
const validate = required ? validateRequired : undefined;
const previousTenantId = useRef(tenantId);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably usePrevious hook will fit your expectations here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

Copy link

@alisher-epam alisher-epam merged commit 29517b8 into master Jul 25, 2024
6 checks passed
@alisher-epam alisher-epam deleted the UISACQCOMP-201 branch July 25, 2024 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants