Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIOR-1078: Allow Editing of "Renewal Date" and "Subscription to" on o… #1508

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

alisher-epam
Copy link
Contributor

…pen purchase order line

Purpose

UIOR-1078 - Allow Editing of "Renewal Date" and "Subscription to" on open purchase order line

Approach

Screen.Recording.2023-10-05.at.5.05.13.PM.mov

Screenshots

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 5, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

    1 files  ±0  234 suites  ±0   7m 51s ⏱️ - 2m 22s
587 tests +1  587 ✔️ +1  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
595 runs  +1  595 ✔️ +1  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 5723c68. ± Comparison against base commit 4213d74.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 5, 2023

BigTest Unit Test Statistics

0 tests  ±0   0 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ±0 

Results for commit 5723c68. ± Comparison against base commit 4213d74.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@alisher-epam alisher-epam requested review from usavkov-epam and a team October 5, 2023 14:33
@usavkov-epam
Copy link
Contributor

Just in case: this story is linked to "Q" release, so please do NOT merge it until the release of ui-orders

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

88.9% 88.9% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@usavkov-epam
Copy link
Contributor

I didn’t really understand this PR. The "Purpose" of your PR and the description of the ticket UIOR-1078 tell about changes in the PO line form, but I see in this PR work on the PO form.

@alisher-epam
Copy link
Contributor Author

I didn’t really understand this PR. The "Purpose" of your PR and the description of the ticket UIOR-1078 tell about changes in the PO line form, but I see in this PR work on the PO form.

Yeah, basically in order to get Open status PR it should have PO lines and we can create it from action menus
Screenshot 2023-10-13 at 8 12 19 PM

@alisher-epam alisher-epam merged commit 3a63d04 into master Oct 16, 2023
5 checks passed
@alisher-epam alisher-epam deleted the UIOR-1078 branch October 16, 2023 09:29
@usavkov-epam
Copy link
Contributor

Having merged this PR, are you sure that it fully complies with the requirements of UIOR-1078?

@usavkov-epam
Copy link
Contributor

And don't we need to bump the version to 5.1.0 in the package.json beforehand? @zburke

@zburke
Copy link
Member

zburke commented Oct 16, 2023

Yes, package.json needs to be bumped to 5.1.0. I've tried to get in the habit of doing that on the master branch as soon as I make a release, but many folks just do it in the first new-feature PR. Up to you, as long as it happens :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants