Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIPQB-55: Regular expressions are incorrect for contains and starts_with operators #63

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

UladzislauKutarkin
Copy link
Contributor

UIPQB-55

Purpose

Approach

TODOS and Open Questions

Learning

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 10, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

  1 files  ±0    8 suites  ±0   31s ⏱️ +3s
52 tests ±0  50 ✔️ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
54 runs  ±0  52 ✔️ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 6b10495. ± Comparison against base commit 252a6eb.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@UladzislauKutarkin UladzislauKutarkin requested review from vashjs and a team October 10, 2023 12:30
Copy link
Member

@zburke zburke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be great to have some of the detail provided in the Jira ticket (which describes the bug) here in the PR title/description which should, instead of describing the problem, describe how the code is changing, e.g. "Avoid extra caret prefix in contains/starts_with queries" instead of "Regular expressions are incorrect...".

A good way to think of PR titles is to complete the sentence, "After this is merged, the code will ..."

@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ describe('mongoQueryToSource()', () => {
{ user_last_name: { $lt: 10 } },
{ user_last_name: { $gte: 'value' } },
{ languages: { $in: ['value', 'value2'] } },
{ user_full_name: { $regex: '^abc' } },
{ user_full_name: { $regex: '^abc' } },
{ user_full_name: { $regex: 'abc' } },
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this line be duplicated?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

initial and source need to stay in sync. I think you're right that it's a duplicate, @vashjs, but we'd need to purge the related lines throughout the rest of this test file too: lines 62-67, and line 85.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zburke thanks for response, you are right. I think we will do small tests clenup in feature stories.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed duplicates. Thanks for your comments.

@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ describe('mongoQueryToSource()', () => {
{ user_last_name: { $lt: 10 } },
{ user_last_name: { $gte: 'value' } },
{ languages: { $in: ['value', 'value2'] } },
{ user_full_name: { $regex: '^abc' } },
{ user_full_name: { $regex: '^abc' } },
{ user_full_name: { $regex: 'abc' } },
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zburke thanks for response, you are right. I think we will do small tests clenup in feature stories.

@vashjs
Copy link
Contributor

vashjs commented Oct 11, 2023

It would be great to have some of the detail provided in the Jira ticket (which describes the bug) here in the PR title/description which should, instead of describing the problem, describe how the code is changing, e.g. "Avoid extra caret prefix in contains/starts_with queries" instead of "Regular expressions are incorrect...".

A good way to think of PR titles is to complete the sentence, "After this is merged, the code will ..."

I completely agree, it’s also a good idea to add screenshots or GIFs where possible, for a better understanding of what has changed.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@UladzislauKutarkin UladzislauKutarkin merged commit 7ea3823 into master Oct 12, 2023
@UladzislauKutarkin UladzislauKutarkin deleted the UIPQB-55 branch October 12, 2023 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants