Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIPQB-57 400 error should be reported in the UI #64

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 13, 2023
Merged

UIPQB-57 400 error should be reported in the UI #64

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 13, 2023

Conversation

vashjs
Copy link
Contributor

@vashjs vashjs commented Oct 10, 2023

Purpose

Added callout and enable button to make possible retrying of qury test in case of error.
https://issues.folio.org/browse/UIPQB-57

Approach

TODOS and Open Questions

Learning

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

@vashjs vashjs requested review from UladzislauKutarkin and a team October 10, 2023 22:50
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 10, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

  1 files  ±0    8 suites  ±0   40s ⏱️ +9s
52 tests ±0  50 ✔️ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
54 runs  ±0  52 ✔️ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 16bd514. ± Comparison against base commit 14902b1.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

33.3% 33.3% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@vashjs vashjs merged commit b7303de into master Oct 13, 2023
4 checks passed
@vashjs vashjs deleted the UIPQB-57 branch October 13, 2023 07:16
vashjs added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants