Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIPQB-53 Add support for $contains and $not_contains operators #75

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

vashjs
Copy link
Contributor

@vashjs vashjs commented Nov 30, 2023

Purpose

After this PR is merged, we will be able to support fields with the "arrayType" type.

  • When selecting this type, we have several options “contains” and “not contains”.
  • this gives as opportunity to submit queries using $contains/$not_contains operators which BE is expecting

Approach

TODOS and Open Questions

Learning

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 30, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

  1 files  ±0    8 suites  ±0   1m 7s ⏱️ -2s
53 tests  - 1  52 ✔️  - 1  1 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
55 runs   - 1  54 ✔️  - 1  1 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 08d1e28. ± Comparison against base commit 20122c7.

This pull request removes 2 and adds 1 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
DataTypeInput should render correct component based on arrayType and == ‑ DataTypeInput should render correct component based on arrayType and ==
DataTypeInput should render correct component based on arrayType and in ‑ DataTypeInput should render correct component based on arrayType and in
DataTypeInput should render correct component based on arrayType and contains ‑ DataTypeInput should render correct component based on arrayType and contains

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 3, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@vashjs vashjs merged commit 4d1e2b3 into master Dec 8, 2023
5 checks passed
@vashjs vashjs deleted the UIPQB-53 branch December 8, 2023 00:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants