UIREC-307 Expect "Unreceivable" pieces on the full screen form

[usavkov-epam]

Purpose

https://issues.folio.org/browse/UIREC-307

Approach

Use "expect" API to update pieces statuses.

Screenshot

chrome_DyUJEXrK4U.mp4

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

• I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
• Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
  • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
  • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
  • There are no major code smells or security issues
• Does this introduce breaking changes?
  • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
  • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

• What other modules will these changes impact?
• Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
  • If not, please create them
  • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
  • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
• Are the JIRAs under active development?
  • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
• Do PRs exist for these changes?
  • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

[github-actions]

Jest Unit Test Statistics

214 tests  +2   213 ✔️ +2   3m 40s ⏱️ +8s
  68 suites +1       1 💤 ±0 
    1 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 276a64c. ± Comparison against base commit 450b7ac.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

BigTest Unit Test Statistics

0 tests  ±0   0 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 276a64c. ± Comparison against base commit 450b7ac.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
91.7% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[zburke]

LGTM

This code is clear, intuitive, and easy to follow. Nice work! The way you anticipated this feature in the previous Promise.reject implementation was a nice touch. Kudos!