Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIREQ-1032, UIREQ-1034, UIREQ-1035 - Request detail view update for Lending, Borrowing and Pickup DCB roles #1120

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2023

Conversation

Terala-Priyanka
Copy link
Contributor

@Terala-Priyanka Terala-Priyanka commented Nov 9, 2023

Purpose

Reshare DCB is a feature that allows sharing of assets within consortium.
Folio has primarily 3 roles in this feature - Lending, Borrowing, Pickup

Lending Role

Requested item would be a real item (i.e., an item from inventory).
Requester would be a virtual patron (user type - DCB)

Borrowing Role

Requested item would be a virtual item
Requester would be a real patron

Pickup Role

Requested item would be a virtual item (i.e., an item from inventory).
Requester would be a virtual patron (user type - DCB)
More details of the feature are available at https://wiki.folio.org/display/FOLIJET/DCB+Integration

Approach

  1. Actions menu will display only "cancel request" menu item for all the roles explained above - hence the logic behind this implementation is a check if the request is virtual or item is virtual.
  2. Title and item barcode are available as only text when in case of virtual item.
  3. All virtual items have hardcoded "istanceId" and "holdingsRecordId".
  4. All virtual patrons have their lastname hardcoded to "DcbSystem"

Refs

UIREQ-1032 -[DCB] Request details: Hide all actions except "Cancel Request" in Action menu (Lending library)
UIREQ-1034 - [DCB] Request details: Updates for Action menu and DCB item links (Borrowing library)
UIREQ-1035 - [DCB] Request details: Updates for Action menu and DCB item links (Pickup library)

Screenshots

#1118

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

    1 files  ±  0    50 suites  ±0   1m 27s ⏱️ -8s
606 tests +14  606 ✔️ +14  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
607 runs  +14  607 ✔️ +14  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 852d154. ± Comparison against base commit 43515f6.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2023

BigTest Unit Test Statistics

0 tests  ±0   0 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ±0 

Results for commit 852d154. ± Comparison against base commit 43515f6.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@Terala-Priyanka Terala-Priyanka merged commit 7dc3f62 into DCB Nov 10, 2023
5 checks passed
@Terala-Priyanka Terala-Priyanka deleted the UIREQ-1032-DCB branch November 10, 2023 05:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants