-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 282
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Image analysis CoP #2802
Image analysis CoP #2802
Conversation
--- | ||
description: "If you need to extract quantitative information from images and want to make your workflows reusable, this community is for you." | ||
autotoc: true | ||
title: "iMAGE-NET – Image Analysis Network in Galaxy" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's discuss this in the broader group
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we changing it to: Galaxy Image Network (GIN)🍸?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm collecting here some arguments I've heard against it over lunch:
- Network can be confused with neural network for image analysis
- Image analysis doesn't include e.g. image processing
- To be consistent with the other communities, it would be good to include the word "community" there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For those as uninformed as me :) this is supposed to the our page for https://galaxyproject.org/community/sig/
One general note: The headings are capitalized very inconsistently right now.
--- | ||
description: "If you need to extract quantitative information from images and want to make your workflows reusable, this community is for you." | ||
autotoc: true | ||
title: "iMAGE-NET – Image Analysis Network in Galaxy" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this title! Last year we had a lot of discussions on how we wanna call ourselves, and we agreed that "imaging people" is inappropriate, and we also agreed that "image people" or "image community" would be better, but I think that this has remained a subpar solution. Image network is nice.
Still, I have two concerns here:
- Why the capitalization?
- There is a chance of being confused with the ImageNet project https://www.image-net.org
Considering both of the above, maybe "Image Network", "Image Network", or "🍸 Galaxy Image Network (GIN)" would be better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks lots @kostrykin, I'm glad you like the title! I didn’t realize that 'Image-Net' already exists. I prefer names that are easy for people to remember or that create a catchy acronym—like the single-cell community, which is known as SPOC. The minuscule "i" I feel would look good on a logo but we can change that.
Suggestion for a change could be: GIN – Galaxy Image Network
cc: @beatrizserrano
This is so cool you guys! |
Also if you catch any documentation to update / fix / add here (https://training.galaxyproject.org/training-material/topics/community/), please let me know! Anything to make this process easier! |
Add a Community of Practice web page for the Image Analysis community in Galaxy.