feat: airtable integration #339
Conversation
chore: release v0.0.5
chore: release v0.0.6
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several new optional properties to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
server/src/models/Robot.ts (1)
Airtable integration implementation is incomplete
The model changes add Airtable fields but lack essential implementation components that are present in the existing GSheet integration:
- Missing
server/src/workflow-management/integrations/airtable.tswith:
- Airtable API client setup and authentication
- Data transformation and writing logic
- Update task queue with retry mechanism
- Error handling for API operations
Reference the existing GSheet integration at
server/src/workflow-management/integrations/gsheet.tsfor the established integration pattern.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
28-121: Verify integration implementation completenessWhile the model changes lay the groundwork for Airtable integration, there might be additional components needed:
- Airtable API client/service
- Integration configuration validation
- Error handling for Airtable operations
- Migration script for adding these columns
Would you like me to help create a checklist of remaining implementation tasks?
Let's check for any related integration code:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Airtable-related implementation files rg -l "airtable" --type ts --glob '!{server/src/models/Robot.ts}' # Check for any existing integration patterns rg -l "integration|client|service" --type ts --glob 'server/src/**'Length of output: 629
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check GSheet integration implementation cat server/src/workflow-management/integrations/gsheet.ts # Look for integration interfaces/base classes ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_Integration { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'class $_Integration { $$$ }'Length of output: 5748
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
server/src/models/Robot.ts (2)
106-121: Consider database optimizationsA few suggestions for the column definitions:
- Add
lengthconstraints to the STRING fields to optimize storage- Consider adding indexes if these fields will be used in queries
- Add
validateconstraints if specific formats are expected (e.g., for base_id)Example:
airtable_base_id: { type: DataTypes.STRING, allowNull: true, + length: 100, + validate: { + // Add format validation if needed + } },
134-140: Document the relationship requirementsThe commented-out relationship code lacks context. If this is planned for future implementation:
- Add a TODO comment explaining when/why this will be needed
- Create a tracking issue for implementing these relationships
server/src/models/Robot.ts
Outdated
| public airtable_base_id!: string | null; | ||
| public airtable_table_name!: string | null; | ||
| public airtable_api_key!: string | null; | ||
| public airtable_access_token!: string | null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary non-null assertions
The properties are declared with non-null assertions (!) despite being nullable (string | null). This could lead to runtime errors. Consider:
- public airtable_base_id!: string | null;
- public airtable_table_name!: string | null;
- public airtable_api_key!: string | null;
- public airtable_access_token!: string | null;
+ public airtable_base_id?: string | null;
+ public airtable_table_name?: string | null;
+ public airtable_api_key?: string | null;
+ public airtable_access_token?: string | null;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public airtable_base_id!: string | null; | |
| public airtable_table_name!: string | null; | |
| public airtable_api_key!: string | null; | |
| public airtable_access_token!: string | null; | |
| public airtable_base_id?: string | null; | |
| public airtable_table_name?: string | null; | |
| public airtable_api_key?: string | null; | |
| public airtable_access_token?: string | null; |
server/src/models/Robot.ts
Outdated
| airtable_base_id?: string | null; // Airtable Base ID | ||
| airtable_table_name?: string | null; // Airtable Table Name | ||
| airtable_api_key?: string | null; // Airtable API Key | ||
| airtable_access_token?: string | null; // Airtable OAuth Access Token |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Implement encryption for Airtable credentials using existing utils
The codebase has robust encryption utilities in server/src/utils/auth.ts that are already used for similar sensitive data. Use the encrypt()/decrypt() functions to secure the Airtable credentials before storing them, similar to how proxy credentials are handled.
- In Robot model operations, encrypt values before saving to database
- Decrypt values when reading for Airtable API calls
[security]
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider security measures for Airtable credentials
The Airtable API key and access token are sensitive credentials. Consider:
- Encrypting these fields at rest in the database
- Using environment variables or a secure credential management system
- Implementing proper access controls and audit logging for these fields
Let's check if there are any encryption utilities or secure credential handling patterns in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for encryption-related code or secure credential handling
rg -i "encrypt|decrypt|credentials|secret" --type ts
Length of output: 9606
chore: release v0.0.7
…to integraton_airtable2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
server/src/workflow-management/integrations/airtableintegration.ts (2)
36-36: Simplify condition using optional chaining.You can simplify the condition by using optional chaining to make the code cleaner and reduce potential errors when accessing nested properties.
Apply this diff:
- } else if (plainRun.binaryOutput && plainRun.binaryOutput['item-0']) { + } else if (plainRun.binaryOutput?.['item-0']) {🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 36-36: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
48-53: Ensure secure handling of sensitive credentials.The
personalAccessTokenis used directly from theplainRobotobject. For enhanced security, consider encrypting sensitive credentials like API keys and access tokens in storage and decrypt them only when needed.src/components/integration/IntegrationSettings.tsx (2)
Line range hint
18-18: Remove unused import of 'js-cookie'.The
js-cookielibrary is imported but not used since custom helper functions are defined to handle cookies. Consider removing the import to clean up the code.Apply this diff:
-import Cookies from 'js-cookie';
351-351: Simplify conditional rendering using optional chaining.You can simplify the condition by using optional chaining, enhancing code readability.
Apply this diff:
- {recording && recording.airtable_base_id ? ( + {recording?.airtable_base_id ? (🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 351-351: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
migrations/20250111140925-add-airtable-fields-to-robot.js (1)
1-1: Remove redundant 'use strict' directive.Modules in ECMAScript are in strict mode by default. The
'use strict';directive is unnecessary and can be removed.Apply this diff:
-'use strict';🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
config/config.json(1 hunks)migrations/20250111140925-add-airtable-fields-to-robot.js(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)server/src/models/Robot.ts(4 hunks)server/src/workflow-management/integrations/airtableintegration.ts(1 hunks)server/src/workflow-management/scheduler/index.ts(3 hunks)src/components/integration/IntegrationSettings.tsx(8 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- server/src/models/Robot.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
migrations/20250111140925-add-airtable-fields-to-robot.js
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.
(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
src/components/integration/IntegrationSettings.tsx
[error] 351-351: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
server/src/workflow-management/integrations/airtableintegration.ts
[error] 36-36: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
server/src/workflow-management/integrations/airtableintegration.ts (1)
79-79: Verify Airtable SDK support for personal access tokens.Initializing Airtable with
apiKey: personalAccessTokenmay not be suitable for personal access tokens. The Airtable SDK might require a different method for authentication when using personal access tokens instead of API keys. Ensure that the SDK version supports personal access tokens or adjust the code accordingly.Please run the following script to check if the Airtable SDK supports personal access tokens:
server/src/workflow-management/scheduler/index.ts (1)
9-9: LGTM!The import statement for Airtable integration functions is correctly structured.
config/config.json (1)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance database configuration security and performance.
The current configuration has several areas for improvement:
- Using default credentials in development configuration poses a security risk
- Missing essential configuration options:
- SSL mode
- Connection pool settings
- Logging options
- Statement timeout
Consider updating the configuration:
{ "development": { - "username": "postgres", - "password": "postgres", + "username": "${DB_USER}", + "password": "${DB_PASSWORD}", "database": "maxun", "host": "localhost", "port": 5432, - "dialect": "postgres" + "dialect": "postgres", + "pool": { + "max": 5, + "min": 0, + "acquire": 30000, + "idle": 10000 + }, + "dialectOptions": { + "ssl": false, + "statement_timeout": 10000 + }, + "logging": true } }package.json (1)
24-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate Airtable dependency and add type definitions.
The Airtable package configuration needs attention:
- Version 0.12.2 is not the latest (current is 0.12.5)
- Missing TypeScript type definitions (@types/airtable)
Update the dependencies:
{ "dependencies": { - "airtable": "^0.12.2", + "airtable": "^0.12.5", }, "devDependencies": { + "@types/airtable": "^0.10.1", } }✅ Verification successful
Confirmed: TypeScript types needed for Airtable integration
The codebase extensively uses TypeScript with Airtable in multiple components, including integration services and React components. Adding
@types/airtablewill enhance type safety and developer experience. Updating to the latest version is also recommended for consistency.
- Key TypeScript files using Airtable:
server/src/workflow-management/integrations/airtableintegration.tsserver/src/models/Robot.tssrc/components/integration/IntegrationSettings.tsx🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any existing Airtable type imports rg "from ['|\"]@types/airtable" # Verify if Airtable is used with TypeScript ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "airtable"'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any Airtable usage patterns rg -i "airtable" --type ts --type js --type json -g '!package*.json' # Check for TypeScript configuration fd "tsconfig.json"Length of output: 11873
| for (const runId in airtableUpdateTasks) { | ||
| const task = airtableUpdateTasks[runId]; | ||
| console.log(`Processing task for runId: ${runId}, status: ${task.status}`); | ||
|
|
||
| if (task.status === 'pending') { | ||
| hasPendingTasks = true; | ||
| try { | ||
| await updateAirtable(task.robotId, task.runId); | ||
| console.log(`Successfully updated Airtable for runId: ${runId}`); | ||
| delete airtableUpdateTasks[runId]; | ||
| } catch (error: any) { | ||
| console.error(`Failed to update Airtable for run ${task.runId}:`, error); | ||
| if (task.retries < MAX_RETRIES) { | ||
| airtableUpdateTasks[runId].retries += 1; | ||
| console.log(`Retrying task for runId: ${runId}, attempt: ${task.retries}`); | ||
| } else { | ||
| airtableUpdateTasks[runId].status = 'failed'; | ||
| console.log(`Max retries reached for runId: ${runId}. Marking task as failed.`); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid modifying airtableUpdateTasks while iterating over it.
Deleting properties from airtableUpdateTasks during iteration can lead to unexpected behavior or skipped entries. This might cause some tasks to be missed during processing.
Refactor the code to collect the tasks to delete and remove them after the iteration. Apply this diff:
export const processAirtableUpdates = async () => {
while (true) {
let hasPendingTasks = false;
+ const tasksToDelete: string[] = [];
for (const runId in airtableUpdateTasks) {
const task = airtableUpdateTasks[runId];
console.log(`Processing task for runId: ${runId}, status: ${task.status}`);
if (task.status === 'pending') {
hasPendingTasks = true;
try {
await updateAirtable(task.robotId, task.runId);
console.log(`Successfully updated Airtable for runId: ${runId}`);
- delete airtableUpdateTasks[runId];
+ tasksToDelete.push(runId);
} catch (error: any) {
console.error(`Failed to update Airtable for run ${task.runId}:`, error);
if (task.retries < MAX_RETRIES) {
airtableUpdateTasks[runId].retries += 1;
console.log(`Retrying task for runId: ${runId}, attempt: ${task.retries}`);
} else {
airtableUpdateTasks[runId].status = 'failed';
console.log(`Max retries reached for runId: ${runId}. Marking task as failed.`);
}
}
}
}
+ // Remove tasks after iteration
+ for (const runId of tasksToDelete) {
+ delete airtableUpdateTasks[runId];
+ }
if (!hasPendingTasks) {
console.log('No pending tasks. Exiting loop.');
break;
}
console.log('Waiting for 5 seconds before checking again...');
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 5000));
}
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| for (const runId in airtableUpdateTasks) { | |
| const task = airtableUpdateTasks[runId]; | |
| console.log(`Processing task for runId: ${runId}, status: ${task.status}`); | |
| if (task.status === 'pending') { | |
| hasPendingTasks = true; | |
| try { | |
| await updateAirtable(task.robotId, task.runId); | |
| console.log(`Successfully updated Airtable for runId: ${runId}`); | |
| delete airtableUpdateTasks[runId]; | |
| } catch (error: any) { | |
| console.error(`Failed to update Airtable for run ${task.runId}:`, error); | |
| if (task.retries < MAX_RETRIES) { | |
| airtableUpdateTasks[runId].retries += 1; | |
| console.log(`Retrying task for runId: ${runId}, attempt: ${task.retries}`); | |
| } else { | |
| airtableUpdateTasks[runId].status = 'failed'; | |
| console.log(`Max retries reached for runId: ${runId}. Marking task as failed.`); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| for (const runId in airtableUpdateTasks) { | |
| const task = airtableUpdateTasks[runId]; | |
| console.log(`Processing task for runId: ${runId}, status: ${task.status}`); | |
| if (task.status === 'pending') { | |
| hasPendingTasks = true; | |
| try { | |
| await updateAirtable(task.robotId, task.runId); | |
| console.log(`Successfully updated Airtable for runId: ${runId}`); | |
| tasksToDelete.push(runId); | |
| } catch (error: any) { | |
| console.error(`Failed to update Airtable for run ${task.runId}:`, error); | |
| if (task.retries < MAX_RETRIES) { | |
| airtableUpdateTasks[runId].retries += 1; | |
| console.log(`Retrying task for runId: ${runId}, attempt: ${task.retries}`); | |
| } else { | |
| airtableUpdateTasks[runId].status = 'failed'; | |
| console.log(`Max retries reached for runId: ${runId}. Marking task as failed.`); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Remove tasks after iteration | |
| for (const runId of tasksToDelete) { | |
| delete airtableUpdateTasks[runId]; | |
| } |
| } catch (error: any) { | ||
| console.error( | ||
| "Error updating Airtable configuration:", | ||
| error.response?.data?.message || error.message | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Notify the user on Airtable configuration errors.
In the updateAirtableConfig function, errors are logged to the console but not communicated to the user. Informing the user about the error would improve the user experience.
Apply this diff:
} catch (error: any) {
console.error(
"Error updating Airtable configuration:",
error.response?.data?.message || error.message
);
+ notify(
+ "error",
+ t('integration_settings.airtable.errors.update_error', {
+ message: error.response?.data?.message || error.message
+ })
+ );
}Ensure the translation key integration_settings.airtable.errors.update_error exists in your localization files.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| } catch (error: any) { | |
| console.error( | |
| "Error updating Airtable configuration:", | |
| error.response?.data?.message || error.message | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| } catch (error: any) { | |
| console.error( | |
| "Error updating Airtable configuration:", | |
| error.response?.data?.message || error.message | |
| ); | |
| notify( | |
| "error", | |
| t('integration_settings.airtable.errors.update_error', { | |
| message: error.response?.data?.message || error.message | |
| }) | |
| ); | |
| } |
| // Add task for Google Sheets update | ||
| googleSheetUpdateTasks[id] = { | ||
| robotId: plainRun.robotMetaId, | ||
| runId: id, | ||
| status: 'pending', | ||
| retries: 5, | ||
| }; | ||
| processGoogleSheetUpdates(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Add task for Airtable update | ||
| airtableUpdateTasks[id] = { | ||
| robotId: plainRun.robotMetaId, | ||
| runId: id, | ||
| status: 'pending', | ||
| retries: 5, | ||
| }; | ||
| processAirtableUpdates(); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and consider refactoring update tasks.
While the implementation mirrors the Google Sheets structure, there are opportunities for improvement:
- Error handling is missing for both
processGoogleSheetUpdates()andprocessAirtableUpdates()calls - The task creation logic is duplicated and could be abstracted
Consider refactoring to:
+ const createIntegrationTask = (type: 'googleSheet' | 'airtable', id: string, robotId: string) => {
+ const tasks = type === 'googleSheet' ? googleSheetUpdateTasks : airtableUpdateTasks;
+ tasks[id] = {
+ robotId,
+ runId: id,
+ status: 'pending',
+ retries: 5,
+ };
+ };
+ try {
+ // Create and process Google Sheets task
+ createIntegrationTask('googleSheet', id, plainRun.robotMetaId);
+ await processGoogleSheetUpdates();
+
+ // Create and process Airtable task
+ createIntegrationTask('airtable', id, plainRun.robotMetaId);
+ await processAirtableUpdates();
+ } catch (error) {
+ logger.error(`Failed to process integration updates: ${error.message}`);
+ // Consider whether to fail the run or just log the error
+ }
- // Add task for Google Sheets update
- googleSheetUpdateTasks[id] = {
- robotId: plainRun.robotMetaId,
- runId: id,
- status: 'pending',
- retries: 5,
- };
- processGoogleSheetUpdates();
-
- // Add task for Airtable update
- airtableUpdateTasks[id] = {
- robotId: plainRun.robotMetaId,
- runId: id,
- status: 'pending',
- retries: 5,
- };
- processAirtableUpdates();Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/integration/IntegrationSettings.tsx (1)
381-394: Enhance input validation for Airtable configuration.The current validation only checks for non-empty values. Consider adding more robust validation for the Base ID and Table Name fields.
Apply this diff:
<TextField sx={{ marginTop: "15px" }} label={t('integration_settings.airtable.fields.base_id')} value={settings.airtableBaseId} - onChange={(e) => setSettings({ ...settings, airtableBaseId: e.target.value })} + onChange={(e) => { + const value = e.target.value.trim(); + setSettings({ ...settings, airtableBaseId: value }); + }} + error={settings.airtableBaseId.trim() !== '' && !/^app[a-zA-Z0-9]{14}$/.test(settings.airtableBaseId)} + helperText={settings.airtableBaseId.trim() !== '' && !/^app[a-zA-Z0-9]{14}$/.test(settings.airtableBaseId) + ? t('integration_settings.airtable.errors.invalid_base_id') + : ''} fullWidth /> <TextField sx={{ marginTop: "15px" }} label={t('integration_settings.airtable.fields.table_name')} value={settings.airtableTableName} - onChange={(e) => setSettings({ ...settings, airtableTableName: e.target.value })} + onChange={(e) => { + const value = e.target.value.trim(); + setSettings({ ...settings, airtableTableName: value }); + }} + error={settings.airtableTableName.trim() !== '' && settings.airtableTableName.length < 3} + helperText={settings.airtableTableName.trim() !== '' && settings.airtableTableName.length < 3 + ? t('integration_settings.airtable.errors.invalid_table_name') + : ''} fullWidth />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
server/src/models/Robot.ts(4 hunks)src/components/integration/IntegrationSettings.tsx(8 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- server/src/models/Robot.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/integration/IntegrationSettings.tsx
[error] 350-350: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/integration/IntegrationSettings.tsx (3)
28-29: LGTM! Interface changes are well-documented.The new Airtable-specific fields are properly typed and documented.
56-57: LGTM! State initialization is consistent.The new Airtable fields are properly initialized with empty strings.
142-161: Notify the user on Airtable configuration errors.The error handling needs improvement to notify users of configuration update failures.
| {t('integration_settings.airtable.title')} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
|
|
||
| {recording && recording.airtable_base_id ? ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use optional chaining for safer property access.
The code should use optional chaining to safely access the recording property.
Apply this diff:
- {recording && recording.airtable_base_id ? (
+ {recording?.airtable_base_id ? (📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {recording && recording.airtable_base_id ? ( | |
| {recording?.airtable_base_id ? ( |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 350-350: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
| // Airtable Authentication | ||
| const authenticateWithAirtable = () => { | ||
| window.location.href = `${apiUrl}/auth/airtable?robotId=${recordingId}`; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for missing recordingId.
The function should validate that recordingId exists before proceeding with authentication.
Apply this diff:
const authenticateWithAirtable = () => {
+ if (!recordingId) {
+ notify("error", t('integration_settings.errors.missing_recording_id'));
+ return;
+ }
window.location.href = `${apiUrl}/auth/airtable?robotId=${recordingId}`;
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Airtable Authentication | |
| const authenticateWithAirtable = () => { | |
| window.location.href = `${apiUrl}/auth/airtable?robotId=${recordingId}`; | |
| }; | |
| // Airtable Authentication | |
| const authenticateWithAirtable = () => { | |
| if (!recordingId) { | |
| notify("error", t('integration_settings.errors.missing_recording_id')); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| window.location.href = `${apiUrl}/auth/airtable?robotId=${recordingId}`; | |
| }; |
| const removeIntegration = async (integrationType: 'google' | 'airtable') => { | ||
| try { | ||
| await axios.post( | ||
| `${apiUrl}/auth/gsheets/remove`, | ||
| `${apiUrl}/auth/${integrationType}/remove`, | ||
| { robotId: recordingId }, | ||
| { withCredentials: true } | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| setRecording(null); | ||
| setSpreadsheets([]); | ||
| setSettings({ spreadsheetId: "", spreadsheetName: "", data: "" }); | ||
| setSettings({ | ||
| spreadsheetId: "", | ||
| spreadsheetName: "", | ||
| airtableBaseId: "", | ||
| airtableTableName: "", | ||
| data: "", | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling in removeIntegration function.
The function should notify users of errors and use more user-friendly error messages.
Apply this diff:
} catch (error: any) {
+ const errorMessage = error.response?.data?.message || error.message;
console.error(
`Error removing ${integrationType} integration:`,
- error.response?.data?.message || error.message
+ errorMessage
);
+ notify(
+ "error",
+ t('integration_settings.errors.remove_integration', {
+ type: integrationType,
+ message: errorMessage
+ })
+ );
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
IntegrationSettingscomponent to manage Airtable-specific settings and authentication.