Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(sveltekit): Switch to explicit vitest imports #12960

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

AbhiPrasad
Copy link
Member

As per https://vitest.dev/config/#globals

By default, vitest does not provide global APIs for explicitness

I think we should follow vitest defaults here and explicitly import in the APIs that we need. This refactors our SvelteKit SDK tests to do so.

ref #11084

This change also removes environment: 'jsdom' from the sveltekit global vite config in favour of explicitly adding jsdom environment via the @vitest-environment pragma to the specific test file that needs it. This should means that our server tests are not polluted with jsdom globals, and that future writers have to explicitly opt-in to the behaviour.

@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad requested review from Lms24 and a team July 17, 2024 17:49
@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad self-assigned this Jul 17, 2024
@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad requested review from nicohrubec and removed request for a team July 17, 2024 17:49
@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad force-pushed the abhi-vitest-sveltekit branch from 8aa4613 to 1763829 Compare July 17, 2024 19:24
Copy link
Member

@Lms24 Lms24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great refactor, thanks Abhi!

@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad merged commit 44e8038 into develop Jul 18, 2024
90 checks passed
@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad deleted the abhi-vitest-sveltekit branch July 18, 2024 12:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants