Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump protobuf to 3.7.1 and regenerate code from .proto files #37

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2025

Conversation

diemogebhardt
Copy link
Contributor

@diemogebhardt diemogebhardt commented Jan 30, 2025

This PR bumps protobuf and protobuf-codegen to the latest version (3.7.1) and regenerates code from .proto files.

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ regex = "1.3"
# Byte collections
bytes = "1"
# Protobuf runtime
protobuf = "3.4"
protobuf = "=3.7.1"
Copy link
Contributor Author

@diemogebhardt diemogebhardt Jan 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to pin protobuf and protobuf-codegen to a specific version (=) or not?

In case we don't want to pin it, we should uncomment the code in build.rs that is responsible for regenerating code from .proto files.

@@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ toml = "0.8"

[build-dependencies]
# Protobuf code generation
protobuf-codegen = "3.4"
protobuf-codegen = "=3.7.1"
Copy link
Contributor Author

@diemogebhardt diemogebhardt Jan 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to pin protobuf and protobuf-codegen to a specific version (=) or not?

In case we don't want to pin it, we should uncomment the code in build.rs that is responsible for regenerating code from .proto files.

This was referenced Jan 30, 2025
Copy link
Member

@lpil lpil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@lpil lpil merged commit ef9aede into gleam-lang:main Feb 2, 2025
4 checks passed
@diemogebhardt diemogebhardt mentioned this pull request Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants