Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update prophet with reduced false errors #552

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kongzii
Copy link
Contributor

@kongzii kongzii commented Nov 18, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock, !**/*.lock
  • pyproject.toml is excluded by !**/*.toml

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on modifications to the DeployableTraderAgentER class and its subclasses within the deploy.py file. Key updates include alterations to error handling in the answer_binary_market method, enhancements to logging capabilities, and adjustments to the instantiation of various PredictionProphetAgent models. New attributes have been introduced to manage betting strategies and market trading dates, reflecting a comprehensive refinement of the agents' functionalities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
prediction_market_agent/agents/prophet_agent/deploy.py - Modified error handling in answer_binary_market method of DeployableTraderAgentER.
- Updated logging to show prediction.outcome_prediction.
- Added logger parameter in DeployableOlasEmbeddingOAAgent.
- Updated load methods to instantiate PredictionProphetAgent with various model versions and parameters.
- Defined bet_on_n_markets_per_run attribute across subclasses.
- Introduced trade_on_markets_created_after attribute in DeployablePredictionProphetGPT4oAgentNewMarketTrader.
- Added new classes extending DeployableTraderAgentER.

Possibly related PRs

  • Migrate prophet #366: This PR modifies the DeployableTraderAgentER class and its answer_binary_market method, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding error handling and logging in the same method.
  • Add missing agents to agent_app #382: This PR adds a new property method model to the DeployableTraderAgentER class, which is relevant as it pertains to the same class modified in the main PR.
  • Prediction prophets based on o1 #469: This PR introduces new classes that extend DeployableTraderAgentER, which is the base class modified in the main PR, indicating a direct relationship through shared class hierarchy.
  • Update DeployableTraderAgent betting stategies for max profit, based on historical simulations #494: This PR updates the get_betting_strategy method in DeployableTraderAgentER, which is relevant as the main PR also involves modifications to the betting strategies in subclasses of this class.
  • Reduce bet_on_n_markets_per_run for expensive agents #534: This PR introduces new classes and modifies existing ones in deploy.py, including DeployablePredictionProphetGPTo1PreviewAgent, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the bet_on_n_markets_per_run attribute.
  • Add prophet-gpt4o agent that trades on new markets #537: This PR adds a new class DeployablePredictionProphetGPT4oAgentNewMarketTrader, which extends the functionality of the DeployablePredictionProphetGPT4oAgent, a class mentioned in the main PR, indicating a direct relationship through shared class hierarchy.

Suggested reviewers

  • evangriffiths

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
prediction_market_agent/agents/prophet_agent/deploy.py (2)

161-163: Consider model version management strategy

The implementation uses date-versioned models (e.g., "gpt-4o-2024-08-06", "o1-preview-2024-09-12"). Consider:

  1. Implementing a version management strategy to handle model deprecations
  2. Centralizing temperature constraints in a configuration file
  3. Adding validation for temperature settings

Consider creating a model configuration class:

class ModelConfig:
    def __init__(self, name: str, supported_temperatures: list[float]):
        self.name = name
        self.supported_temperatures = supported_temperatures

    def validate_temperature(self, temp: float) -> None:
        if temp not in self.supported_temperatures:
            raise ValueError(f"Model {self.name} only supports temperatures: {self.supported_temperatures}")

Also applies to: 186-194, 208-216


Line range hint 78-79: Consider externalizing the deployment date configuration

The hardcoded deployment date (2024, 10, 31) could cause issues if:

  1. The code is redeployed to other environments
  2. The date needs to be adjusted for different trading strategies

Consider moving this to a configuration file or environment variable:

from datetime import datetime
from prediction_market_agent_tooling.tools.utils import DatetimeUTC

class Config:
    MARKET_TRADE_START_DATE: DatetimeUTC = DatetimeUTC.fromisoformat(
        os.getenv('MARKET_TRADE_START_DATE', '2024-10-31T00:00:00Z')
    )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0166254 and 5396f1f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock, !**/*.lock
  • pyproject.toml is excluded by !**/*.toml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • prediction_market_agent/agents/prophet_agent/deploy.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
prediction_market_agent/agents/prophet_agent/deploy.py (1)

41-41: Verify error handling for None predictions

The removal of the None check on prediction.outcome_prediction could potentially lead to NoneType errors. While this aligns with reducing "false errors" (PR objective), we should ensure that:

  1. The upstream predict method guarantees non-None outcome_prediction
  2. Or the caller properly handles potential None returns

@kongzii kongzii merged commit c9ddb44 into main Nov 21, 2024
9 checks passed
@kongzii kongzii deleted the peter/detailedpropheterrors branch November 21, 2024 12:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants