Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add tasks for activating E3, removing ciphernodes and generating sibling data #146

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

samepant
Copy link
Contributor

@samepant samepant commented Oct 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced tasks for managing ciphernodes:
      • ciphernode:remove for removing a ciphernode from the registry.
      • ciphernode:siblings for retrieving siblings of a specified ciphernode.
    • Added enclave:enableE3 task to enable an E3 program by providing its address.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No bug fixes included in this release.
  • Documentation

    • Updated task definitions for clarity and usage instructions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Walkthrough

This changeset introduces new tasks for managing ciphernodes and enabling E3 programs within the registry. Specifically, it adds the ciphernode:remove and ciphernode:siblings tasks for ciphernode management, allowing users to remove a ciphernode and retrieve its siblings, respectively. Additionally, a new task called enclave:enableE3 is introduced to enable E3 programs by interacting with the Enclave contract. Existing tasks for adding ciphernodes and creating committees remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/evm/tasks/ciphernode.ts - Added ciphernode:remove task to remove a ciphernode with specified parameters.
- Added ciphernode:siblings task to retrieve siblings of a ciphernode.
packages/evm/tasks/enclave.ts - Added enclave:enableE3 task to enable an E3 program with a specified address.

Poem

In the garden of code, new tasks bloom bright,
Ciphernodes and E3s, all taking flight.
With a hop and a skip, we manage with glee,
Removing and retrieving, as easy as can be.
So let’s dance through the changes, with joy in our heart,
For in this code garden, we all play a part! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@samepant samepant force-pushed the sam/enclave-task-upgrade branch from 48d35b0 to 00cbbec Compare October 14, 2024 19:15
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/evm/tasks/enclave.ts (2)

141-157: Approve implementation with suggestions for improvement

The new enclave:enableE3 task is well-structured and correctly implemented. However, consider the following improvements:

  1. Add specific error handling to provide more informative error messages.
  2. Include a check to verify if the E3 program is already enabled before attempting to enable it.
  3. Add a verification step after enabling the E3 program to confirm its status.

Here's a suggested implementation with these improvements:

task("enclave:enableE3", "Enable an E3 program")
  .addParam("e3Address", "address of the E3 program")
  .setAction(async function (taskArguments: TaskArguments, hre) {
    try {
      const enclave = await hre.deployments.get("Enclave");
      const enclaveContract = await hre.ethers.getContractAt(
        "Enclave",
        enclave.address
      );

      // Check if the E3 program is already enabled
      const isEnabled = await enclaveContract.isE3ProgramEnabled(taskArguments.e3Address);
      if (isEnabled) {
        console.log(`E3 program at ${taskArguments.e3Address} is already enabled.`);
        return;
      }

      const tx = await enclaveContract.enableE3Program(taskArguments.e3Address);
      console.log("Enabling E3 program... ", tx.hash);
      await tx.wait();

      // Verify the E3 program is now enabled
      const isNowEnabled = await enclaveContract.isE3ProgramEnabled(taskArguments.e3Address);
      if (isNowEnabled) {
        console.log(`E3 program at ${taskArguments.e3Address} has been successfully enabled.`);
      } else {
        console.error(`Failed to enable E3 program at ${taskArguments.e3Address}. Please check the contract state.`);
      }
    } catch (error) {
      console.error("Error enabling E3 program:", error.message);
    }
  });

This implementation adds error handling, checks if the program is already enabled, and verifies the enabled status after the transaction.


Line range hint 1-157: Consider refactoring common patterns

While the changes are focused and well-implemented, there's an opportunity to improve the overall structure of the file:

  1. Consider extracting the common pattern of retrieving the Enclave contract into a shared helper function.
  2. Implement a consistent error handling strategy across all tasks.
  3. Use a common logging format for transaction hashes and confirmations.

These refactorings would improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.

Here's an example of how you could implement a helper function for retrieving the Enclave contract:

async function getEnclaveContract(hre) {
  const enclave = await hre.deployments.get("Enclave");
  return await hre.ethers.getContractAt("Enclave", enclave.address);
}

You can then use this helper function in all tasks that interact with the Enclave contract.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d81034 and 00cbbec.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/evm/tasks/ciphernode.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/evm/tasks/enclave.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: ci
packages/evm/tasks/ciphernode.ts

[failure] 54-54:
'hre' is defined but never used. Allowed unused args must match /_/u

🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/evm/tasks/enclave.ts (1)

141-157: Approve integration of new task

The new enclave:enableE3 task is well-integrated into the existing codebase. It follows the established patterns and structure of other tasks in the file, maintaining consistency and not interfering with existing functionality.

"ciphernodeAddresses",
"comma separated addresses of ciphernodes in the order they were added to the registry",
)
.setAction(async function (taskArguments: TaskArguments, hre) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove unused 'hre' parameter in 'setAction' function

In the ciphernode:siblings task, the hre parameter is defined but never used in the setAction callback function at line 54. This leads to a linting error and can be safely removed to clean up the code.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-  .setAction(async function (taskArguments: TaskArguments, hre) {
+  .setAction(async function (taskArguments: TaskArguments) {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
.setAction(async function (taskArguments: TaskArguments, hre) {
.setAction(async function (taskArguments: TaskArguments) {
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci

[failure] 54-54:
'hre' is defined but never used. Allowed unused args must match /_/u

Comment on lines +64 to +66
const index = tree.indexOf(BigInt(taskArguments.ciphernodeAddress));
const { siblings } = tree.generateProof(index);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling for missing ciphernode address in the tree

The code currently assumes that the ciphernodeAddress exists in the tree. If the address is not found, tree.indexOf may return -1, which could lead to errors when calling tree.generateProof(index). It's advisable to check if the index is valid before proceeding.

Apply this diff to handle cases where the ciphernode address is not found:

    const index = tree.indexOf(BigInt(taskArguments.ciphernodeAddress));
+   if (index === -1) {
+     console.error(`Ciphernode address ${taskArguments.ciphernodeAddress} not found in the tree.`);
+     return;
+   }
    const { siblings } = tree.generateProof(index);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const index = tree.indexOf(BigInt(taskArguments.ciphernodeAddress));
const { siblings } = tree.generateProof(index);
const index = tree.indexOf(BigInt(taskArguments.ciphernodeAddress));
if (index === -1) {
console.error(`Ciphernode address ${taskArguments.ciphernodeAddress} not found in the tree.`);
return;
}
const { siblings } = tree.generateProof(index);

Comment on lines +35 to +37
const siblings = taskArguments.siblings
.split(",")
.map((s: string) => BigInt(s));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add validation for 'siblings' input

Similar to ciphernodeAddresses, the siblings input is parsed and converted to BigInt without validation. Malformed inputs could cause exceptions. It's recommended to validate or handle potential errors when parsing siblings.

Example of adding input validation:

    const siblings = taskArguments.siblings
      .split(",")
-     .map((s: string) => BigInt(s));
+     .map((s: string) => {
+       try {
+         return BigInt(s);
+       } catch (e) {
+         throw new Error(`Invalid sibling value: ${s}`);
+       }
+     });
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const siblings = taskArguments.siblings
.split(",")
.map((s: string) => BigInt(s));
const siblings = taskArguments.siblings
.split(",")
.map((s: string) => {
try {
return BigInt(s);
} catch (e) {
throw new Error(`Invalid sibling value: ${s}`);
}
});

Comment on lines +58 to +62
const addresses = taskArguments.ciphernodeAddresses.split(",");

for (const address of addresses) {
tree.insert(BigInt(address));
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Validate 'ciphernodeAddresses' input before processing

When processing user-provided inputs like ciphernodeAddresses, converting each address to BigInt without validation may result in runtime errors if the input is invalid. Consider adding input validation or error handling to ensure robustness.

Here's how you might add input validation:

    const addresses = taskArguments.ciphernodeAddresses.split(",");

    for (const address of addresses) {
+     let addressBigInt;
+     try {
+       addressBigInt = BigInt(address);
+     } catch (e) {
+       console.error(`Invalid address: ${address}`);
+       return;
+     }
      tree.insert(addressBigInt);
    }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const addresses = taskArguments.ciphernodeAddresses.split(",");
for (const address of addresses) {
tree.insert(BigInt(address));
}
const addresses = taskArguments.ciphernodeAddresses.split(",");
for (const address of addresses) {
let addressBigInt;
try {
addressBigInt = BigInt(address);
} catch (e) {
console.error(`Invalid address: ${address}`);
return;
}
tree.insert(addressBigInt);
}

@samepant samepant merged commit 4b75903 into main Oct 14, 2024
3 checks passed
@samepant samepant deleted the sam/enclave-task-upgrade branch October 14, 2024 19:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant