-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
checking the pwa installation capabilities #34
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request implements Progressive Web App (PWA) capabilities for the application. It introduces a service worker for offline functionality and caching, adds a web app manifest for better integration with mobile devices, and updates the build process to handle these new PWA-related files. File-Level Changes
Tips
|
✅ Deploy Preview for typetocalculate ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @gokulk16 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider adding larger icon sizes (192x192, 512x512) in the manifest.json file to ensure compatibility with various devices and app stores.
- The error handling in the service worker registration could be more informative. Consider logging more details about the error to aid in debugging.
- There's a typo in the
copyFilePlugin
function parameter: 'fileDestPAth' should be 'fileDestPath'.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
Coverage Report
File Coverage
|
@sourcery-ai review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @gokulk16 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider enhancing the offline capabilities. The current implementation caches some assets, but it may not provide full offline functionality as mentioned in the PR description.
- The service worker registration and the
urlsToCache
array might benefit from more robust error handling and testing. Consider using more specific patterns instead of wildcards inurlsToCache
. - Review the error handling strategy. Using
console.error
in multiple places might not be suitable for production code. Consider implementing a more comprehensive logging or error reporting mechanism.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 3 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
Summary by Sourcery
Add PWA support by implementing a service worker and web app manifest, enhancing the user experience with a splash screen and icons, and updating the build process to handle new PWA-related files.
New Features:
Enhancements:
Build: