Fortinet FortiGate - Official Support for Capirca with Local-In Policy Support #364
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…modernizing outdated Python 2 code to Python 3 for improved compatibility, adding comprehensive documentation for clarity, and refactoring functions for enhanced structure and readability.
…th full code cleanup and improved consistency
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Fortinet team is pleased to provide this contribution to Google Capirca. We welcome your guidance and suggestions to this contribution and are committed to the processes at hand.
We have only included three sample .POL files, per the observed standards and including the local-in policies for ipv4 and ipv6.
Thank you.