You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently most DRC check manipulate two types of layer:
local layers, prefixed with the rule name and .forgeted at the end of the rule
global layers, with no particulat naming convention and .forgeted at the end of the deck
I wonder if it would make sense to adopt a naming convention to differentiate between the two or even better implement each rule in a separate function w/ a block so that it can be explicit the scoping ex:
Currently most DRC check manipulate two types of layer:
.forget
ed at the end of the rule.forget
ed at the end of the deckI wonder if it would make sense to adopt a naming convention to differentiate between the two or even better implement each rule in a separate function w/ a block so that it can be explicit the scoping ex:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: