JSDoc Infrastructure #103
Merged
JSDoc Infrastructure #103
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
anan-ya-y
approved these changes
Jul 27, 2020
keiffer01
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2020
HiramSilvey
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is a quick description of the change?
Create some infrastructure for easily generating JSDoc for all JS files in src
Is this fixing an issue?
Addresses some of the points in #94.
Are there more details that are relevant?
To generate JSDoc, run (from anywhere in SLURP):
Check lists (check
xin[ ]of list items)Any additional comments?