Update README.md #408
Update README.md #408
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR updates the README.md file to improve clarity, add usage examples, and include contribution guidelines. Sequence diagram for VTEX order retrieval processsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant VTEXContext
participant VTEXAPI as VTEX API
Client->>VTEXContext: Create(storeName, appKey, appToken)
Client->>VTEXContext: GetOrder(orderId)
VTEXContext->>VTEXAPI: Authenticate
VTEXContext->>VTEXAPI: Request Order
VTEXAPI-->>VTEXContext: Return Order Data
VTEXContext-->>Client: Return Order Object
Class diagram showing the VTEX SDK integration structureclassDiagram
class VTEXContext {
+GetOrder(string orderId)
}
class Connection {
}
class MyClass {
-VTEXContext vtexContext
+MyClass(VTEXContext vtexContext)
}
MyClass --> VTEXContext : depends on
VTEXContext --> Connection : uses
note for VTEXContext "Main entry point for VTEX SDK"
note for Connection "Handles API authentication"
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
gstraccini
bot
added
the
☑️ auto-merge
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on improving the Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
github-actions
bot
added
the
size/M
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Co-authored-by: sourcery-ai[bot] <58596630+sourcery-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs4:43PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
4:43PM INF 355 commits scanned.
4:43PM INF scan completed in 304ms
4:43PM INF no leaks found
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
60-61: Consider adding key features while maintaining docs reference.While referring to the VTEX Developer Docs is good practice, consider listing 3-4 key features to give users a quick overview of the SDK's capabilities without needing to leave the README.
Example addition:
- Full implementation of VTEX API. + - Order management (create, update, list orders) + - Catalog operations (products, SKUs, prices) + - Inventory management + - Payment processing - Refer to [VTEX Developer Docs](https://developers.vtex.com/) for more information.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~123-~123: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 11 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2796 characters long)
Context: ...Contributors Thanks to all contributors! 💙 <!-- readme: collaborators,contribu...
(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
README.md (5)
47-47: LGTM! Improved technical accuracy.
The proper Markdown formatting for the file extension improves readability and technical accuracy.
73-73: Fix typo in variable name.
The variable name "connectionVtex" is misspelled.
67-94: LGTM! Well-structured DI documentation.
The new Dependency Injection section is well-organized with clear examples covering both constructor injection and manual resolution. The null check in the constructor is a good practice to demonstrate.
97-104: LGTM! Clear authentication example.
The authentication section provides a concise example with a helpful link to the official tutorial. The use of string interpolation in the console output is a good practice.
111-123: LGTM! Welcoming community sections.
The support and contributing sections are clear and welcoming. The expression of gratitude to contributors with an exclamation mark and emoji adds a nice personal touch.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~123-~123: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 11 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2796 characters long)
Context: ...Contributors Thanks to all contributors! 💙 <!-- readme: collaborators,contribu...
(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferencesCodacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more |
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| [](https://github.com/guibranco/VTEX-SDK-dotnet) [](https://github.com/guibranco/VTEX-SDK-dotnet) | |||
|
|
|||
| Download the latest zip file from the [Release](https://github.com/GuiBranco/VTEX-SDK-dotnet/releases) page. | |||
| Download the latest `.zip` file from the [Releases](https://github.com/GuiBranco/VTEX-SDK-dotnet/releases) page. | |||
Check warning
Code scanning / Markdownlint (reported by Codacy)
Expected: 80; Actual: 112 Warning
|
|
||
| ```csharp | ||
| var vtexContext = ServiceLocator.Resolve<VTEXContext>(); | ||
| ``` |
Check warning
Code scanning / Markdownlint (reported by Codacy)
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines Warning
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Contributing | ||
|
|
||
| Refer to [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) to learn how to contribute to this project! | ||
| Contributions are welcome! Check out the [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) guide for details. |
Check warning
Code scanning / Markdownlint (reported by Codacy)
Expected: 80; Actual: 94 Warning
|
|
✅ Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.4.297 completed (commit 3e3da4d962 by @guibranco) |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #408 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 0.22% 0.22%
=====================================
Files 117 117
Lines 1777 1777
Branches 75 75
=====================================
Hits 4 4
+ Misses 1773 1771 -2
- Partials 0 2 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Closes #
📑 Description
✅ Checks
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
ℹ Additional Information
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Refactor and enrich the README.md file to improve clarity and provide additional implementation guidelines, including usage of dependency injection and constructor injection.
Why are these changes being made?
The changes are intended to enhance the documentation by clarifying the process of setting up and using the VTEX SDK, providing clearer examples of dependency injection, and updating the style for better readability. This approach aims to facilitate developers in integrating and working with the SDK efficiently.
Summary by CodeRabbit