Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Penify]: Setting up Automated AI-Driven Documentation for GitHub! #424

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

penify-dev[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@penify-dev penify-dev bot commented Jan 13, 2025


📖 Penify config setup

🚀 Installation

Please merge this Pull Request to see Penify in action! This PR will add a configuration file to your repository, which will enable Penify.dev to generate documentation for your code.


🌍 Introduction

In today's fast-paced software development landscape, the importance of accurate, real-time documentation cannot be overstated.
Yet, the manual effort behind it can be daunting. Enter Penify, the game-changer in automated documentation for your GitHub projects.

🚀 Solution: Penify

Penify.dev is not just a tool; it's your intelligent documentation companion on GitHub.

  • 📲 Easy Installation: Integrate Penify effortlessly with your GitHub organization or specific repo.
  • 🛠️ Automatic Activation: It springs to action right after installation.
  • 🔍 Intelligent Tracking: Keenly monitors merged PRs to the main/master branch, keeping tabs on the freshest of files.
  • 🧠 Smart Generation: Understands your code! Recognizes classes, functions, and generates crisp documentation.
  • 🔄 Intelligent Updates: Updates existing docs in line with recent changes.
  • 📜 Review Before Merge: Gives you the power to review! Creates a PR with updated documentation for your approval.

Let's embrace the future of documentation with Penify.

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

  • Add a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically generate documentation on push to the main branch using the Penify DocGen Client.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jan 13, 2025

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces Penify, an AI-powered documentation tool, by adding a GitHub workflow file. The workflow is triggered by pushes to the main branch and uses the SingularityX-ai/snorkell-documentation-client action to generate and update documentation based on the code changes.

Sequence diagram for Penify documentation generation workflow

sequenceDiagram
    participant D as Developer
    participant G as GitHub
    participant P as Penify Service
    participant R as Repository

    D->>G: Push changes to main branch
    G->>P: Trigger documentation workflow
    P->>R: Analyze code changes
    P->>P: Generate documentation
    P->>G: Create PR with documentation
    G->>D: Notify for review
    D->>G: Review and merge documentation PR
Loading

Flow diagram for Penify documentation process

flowchart TD
    A[Code Push to Main] --> B[Trigger Workflow]
    B --> C[Run Penify Client]
    C --> D{Analyze Changes}
    D --> E[Generate Documentation]
    E --> F[Create PR]
    F --> G{Review}
    G -->|Approved| H[Merge Documentation]
    G -->|Rejected| I[Request Changes]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Sets up a GitHub workflow to automate documentation generation using Penify.
  • Adds a workflow file named snorkell-auto-documentation.yml to the .github/workflows directory.
  • Configures the workflow to run on pushes to the main branch.
  • Uses the SingularityX-ai/[email protected] action to generate documentation.
  • Sets up secrets for SNORKELL_CLIENT_ID and SNORKELL_API_KEY to authenticate with Penify.
  • Specifies the main branch as the target for documentation updates.
.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@gstraccini gstraccini bot requested a review from guibranco January 13, 2025 03:39
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added 🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization 🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations labels Jan 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, penify-dev[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 13, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Note

Free review on us!

CodeRabbit is offering free reviews until Wed Jan 15 2025 to showcase some of the refinements we've made.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Penify DocGen Client
uses: SingularityX-ai/[email protected]

Check warning

Code scanning / Semgrep (reported by Codacy)

An action sourced from a third-party repository on GitHub is not pinned to a full length commit SHA. Pinning an action to a full length commit SHA is currently the only way to use an action as an immutable release. Warning

An action sourced from a third-party repository on GitHub is not pinned to a full length commit SHA. Pinning an action to a full length commit SHA is currently the only way to use an action as an immutable release.
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
# This workflow will improvise current file with AI genereated documentation and Create new PR

Check notice

Code scanning / Checkov (reported by Codacy)

Ensure top-level permissions are not set to write-all Note

Ensure top-level permissions are not set to write-all
@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 3.0.14 completed (commit c3df8404de by @penify-dev[bot])

Copy link
Contributor

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs
5:54AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
5:54AM INF 361 commits scanned.
5:54AM INF scan completed in 301ms
5:54AM INF no leaks found

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00% (target: -1.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (db6ab74) 1777 4 0.23%
Head commit (4427f33) 1777 (+0) 4 (+0) 0.23% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#424) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 3.0.23 completed (commit 8f6cb7aff9 by @gstraccini[bot])

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.22%. Comparing base (db6ab74) to head (4427f33).

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #424   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.22%   0.22%           
=====================================
  Files        117     117           
  Lines       1777    1777           
  Branches      75      75           
=====================================
  Hits           4       4           
+ Misses      1773    1771    -2     
- Partials       0       2    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@guibranco guibranco closed this Jan 13, 2025
@guibranco guibranco deleted the penify/config_1682b branch January 13, 2025 10:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization 🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants