Remove code paths only used in non-experimental mode #3728
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai review |
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve the removal of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)The changes are too varied and wide-ranging to be effectively represented in sequence diagrams. The modifications mainly involve removing conditional checks and simplifying existing logic, rather than introducing new features or control flows. Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (57)
Files not processed due to max files limit (3)
Additional Context UsedLearnings (1)
Additional comments not posted (56)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range comments (2)
custom_components/hacs/base.py (2)
Line range hint
782-794: Error handling improvement needed.The method
async_load_hacs_from_githublacks comprehensive error handling for different types of exceptions that might occur during the GitHub API interaction.- except HacsException as exception: + except (HacsException, GitHubAPIException) as exception:
Line range hint
932-960: Enhance user notification for removed repositories.The method
async_handle_removed_repositorieslogs a warning and creates an issue for removed repositories. It could be enhanced by providing a direct link or action in the notification for user convenience.- "this repository has been removed from HACS, please consider removing it." + "this repository has been removed from HACS. [Please consider removing it](link-to-repository)."
emontnemery
force-pushed
the
remove_non_experimental_mode
branch
from
f4a516a to
74875df
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range comments (3)
tests/conftest.py (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationThe search results indicate that there are still references to experimental features in the codebase, particularly in the test files and some utility files. This suggests that the test setup may not fully align with the removal of experimental features as intended by the PR.
tests/hacsbase/test_configuration.py: Contains multiple references to experimental settings.custom_components/hacs/base.py: Contains logic related to experimental features.custom_components/hacs/repositories/base.py: Logs experimental download attempts.custom_components/hacs/utils/data.py: Contains methods for storing experimental content and repositories.These references need to be reviewed and potentially removed or updated to ensure consistency with the PR's goal of removing experimental features.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-1: Ensure that the test setup aligns with the changes made in the PR, particularly the removal of experimental features.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test setup aligns with the changes made in the PR. # Test: Search for the usage of experimental features in the test setup. Expect: No usage of experimental features. rg --type python $'experimental'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test setup aligns with the changes made in the PR. # Test: Search for the usage of experimental features in the test setup. Expect: No usage of experimental features. rg 'experimental' --glob '*.py'Length of output: 1449
custom_components/hacs/base.py (2)
Line range hint
782-794: Add error handling for repository registration.+ try: await self.async_register_repository( repository_full_name=HacsGitHubRepo.INTEGRATION, category=HacsCategory.INTEGRATION, default=True, ) + except HacsException as e: + self.log.error("Failed to register repository: %s", e)
Line range hint
932-960: Improve the clarity of the issue creation process.+ # Creating an issue for a removed repository async_create_issue( hass=self.hass, domain=DOMAIN, issue_id=f"removed_{repository.data.id}", is_fixable=False, issue_domain=DOMAIN, severity=IssueSeverity.WARNING, translation_key="removed", translation_placeholders={ "name": repository.data.full_name, "reason": removed.reason, "repositry_id": repository.data.id, # Note the typo in 'repository_id' should be fixed }, )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range comments (1)
custom_components/hacs/websocket/__init__.py (1)
Line range hint
68-91: The functionhacs_infois missing the implementation to always set the "experimental" key to True as described in the PR and AI-generated summary.{ "categories": hacs.common.categories, "country": hacs.configuration.country, "debug": hacs.configuration.debug, "dev": hacs.configuration.dev, "disabled_reason": hacs.system.disabled_reason, "has_pending_tasks": hacs.queue.has_pending_tasks, "lovelace_mode": hacs.core.lovelace_mode, "stage": hacs.stage, "startup": hacs.status.startup, "version": hacs.version, + "experimental": True, }
emontnemery
force-pushed
the
remove_non_experimental_mode
branch
from
031fed2 to
64334e8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range comments (2)
custom_components/hacs/frontend.py (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationThe
add_extra_js_urlfunction is only used within thecustom_components/hacs/frontend.pyfile and not elsewhere in the codebase.
- The
add_extra_js_urlfunction appears to be unused outside of thecustom_components/hacs/frontend.pyfile. Consider removing it if it is no longer necessary.Analysis chain
Line range hint
14-14: Ensure that theadd_extra_js_urlfunction is still required.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `add_extra_js_url` function is used elsewhere in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: At least one occurrence outside this file. rg --type python $'add_extra_js_url'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `add_extra_js_url` function is used elsewhere in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: At least one occurrence outside this file. rg 'add_extra_js_url'Length of output: 440
tests/snapshots/diagnostics/base.json (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationThe diagnostic snapshot file
tests/snapshots/diagnostics/base.jsoncontains a configuration related to experimental features, specifically"show_beta": false.
tests/snapshots/diagnostics/base.json: Contains"show_beta": falsePlease review and ensure that all experimental features and related configurations are removed as per the PR's objectives.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-1: Ensure removal of experimental features is reflected in diagnostic snapshots.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that no experimental flags or configurations exist in diagnostic snapshots. # Test: Search for 'experimental' in diagnostic snapshots. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type json 'experimental' tests/snapshots/diagnostics/base.jsonLength of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that no experimental flags or configurations exist in diagnostic snapshots. # Test: Search for other potential experimental configurations or flags in diagnostic snapshots. # This includes terms like 'beta', 'feature_flag', 'test_mode', etc. rg --type json 'beta|feature_flag|test_mode' tests/snapshots/diagnostics/base.jsonLength of output: 120
Remove code paths only used in non-experimental mode