Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

5368-Lenient-error-handler-doesn't-always-include-location-information #6678

Conversation

elavy-harris
Copy link
Contributor

Additional logging info, per #5368

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.50%. Comparing base (7e8ac90) to head (be75c95).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #6678      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     83.52%   83.50%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity    28600    28563      -37     
============================================
  Files          1798     1797       -1     
  Lines        111300   111168     -132     
  Branches      13977    13965      -12     
============================================
- Hits          92960    92833     -127     
+ Misses        12352    12345       -7     
- Partials       5988     5990       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@elavy-harris
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't understand why the "codecov/project" check is failing or what to do about it.

Help, please?

Copy link
Collaborator

@jamesagnew jamesagnew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

@jamesagnew jamesagnew merged commit 71aefee into hapifhir:master Feb 12, 2025
118 of 122 checks passed
@elavy-harris elavy-harris deleted the 5368---Lenient-error-handler-doesn't-always-include-location-information branch February 12, 2025 19:14
@elavy-harris elavy-harris mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants