-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scaffolding actions #18639
Merged
philrenaud
merged 11 commits into
18627-task-actions
from
18627-scaffolding-task-actions
Oct 11, 2023
Merged
Scaffolding actions #18639
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9952078
Task-level actions for job submissions and retrieval
philrenaud a1e439e
FIXME: Temporary workaround to get ember dev server to pass exec thro…
philrenaud 2e77eb9
Update api/tasks.go
philrenaud dd4bb5d
Update command/agent/job_endpoint.go
philrenaud 2fc800f
Diff and copy implementations
philrenaud 5b68347
Action structs get their own file, diff updates to behave like our ot…
philrenaud 01ed71e
Test to observe actions changes in a version update
philrenaud 2215148
Tests migrated into structs/diff_test and modified with PR comments i…
philrenaud ae20d4c
APIActionToSTructsAction now returns a new value
philrenaud 1131dfe
de-comment some plain parts, remove unused action lookup
philrenaud 817667b
unused param in action converter
philrenaud File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ var ( | |
"kind", | ||
"volume_mount", | ||
"csi_plugin", | ||
"actions", | ||
) | ||
|
||
sidecarTaskKeys = append(commonTaskKeys, | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ | ||
// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc. | ||
// SPDX-License-Identifier: BUSL-1.1 | ||
|
||
// Actions are executable commands that can be run on an allocation within | ||
// the context of a task. They are left open-ended enough to be applied to | ||
// other Nomad concepts like Nodes in the future. | ||
|
||
package structs | ||
|
||
import "slices" | ||
|
||
type Action struct { | ||
Name string | ||
Command string | ||
Args []string | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (a *Action) Copy() *Action { | ||
if a == nil { | ||
return nil | ||
} | ||
na := new(Action) | ||
*na = *a | ||
na.Args = slices.Clone(a.Args) | ||
return na | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (a *Action) Equal(o *Action) bool { | ||
if a == o { | ||
return true | ||
} | ||
if a == nil || o == nil { | ||
return false | ||
} | ||
return a.Name == o.Name && | ||
a.Command == o.Command && | ||
slices.Equal(a.Args, o.Args) | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hum...I feel like this name may be too generic 🤔
The
structs
package deal with all sorts of stuff and a struct calledAction
may not be obvious what it relates to. PerhapsTaskAction
would be a better name?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not opposed to this (they started out with that name!) but lately we've been talking about Node Actions and similar concepts, which I think would borrow from this a bit. I'm torn!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are they similar or the same?
Reusing structs for similar concepts may result in weird interfaces, like attributes that are
nil
in some cases but not in others. And sometimes that's OK. So there's not right answer, just feels at this point.My vote would be for
TaskAction
, but I will leave it up to you 😄