Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding SAMMI to projects.yml #355

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maxinelasp
Copy link

Adding SAMMI to the projects page.

SAMMI is a CDF attribute manager tool to create ISTP-compliant CDF file attributes. It's a collaboration between SWxSOC and the IMAP SDC. It's a small but flexible tool which allows teams to store variable attributes in VCS friendly YAML files and create attributes that align with standard formats. The attributes are returned as Python dictionaries for inputs into data structures such as xarray datasets or astropy datatables.

SAMMI is released on PyPi and used in both IMAP and SWxSOC processing.

Grades:
community: good
documentation: good
testing: good
software maturity: good
license: good

The license is under Apache 2.0 - I see PyHC recommends BSD 2 or 3. It's my understanding that Apache 2 and BSD 3 are reasonably compatible, and it's a permissive license, so I marked that as good. But, I would appreciate confirmation that Apache 2 actually meets that standard.

@jtniehof
Copy link
Contributor

jtniehof commented Dec 2, 2024

The standard 5 "should" is permissive license; the BSD is just an example. License discussion indicates the community is pretty happy with Apache and the new license PHEP will be written to make that more clear.

So 👍 from me on license.

@jtniehof
Copy link
Contributor

jtniehof commented Dec 2, 2024

BTW the README says PD/CC0

@sapols
Copy link
Contributor

sapols commented Dec 3, 2024

Thanks for the PR, @maxinelasp! SAMMI seems like an interesting project. Just wanted to let you know I've seen this, but with the craziness of AGU and holidays it might be a few weeks before I get around to reviewing it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants