Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: disable income validation #646

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2023
Merged

fix: disable income validation #646

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

ludtkemorgan
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Template

Issue Overview

This PR addresses #3675

  • This change addresses the issue in full
  • This change addresses only certain aspects of the issue
  • This change is a dependency for another issue
  • This change has a dependency from another issue

Description

We disabled the income validation on the application flow for HBA back in June with this commit: #620. However, it was accidentally reverted with the next sync of Core. This adds it back as discussed here

How Can This Be Tested/Reviewed?

This can be tested by doing an application on a listing that has a minimum income. You should be able to apply to the listing with an inputted income lower than the minimum income.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have added QA notes to the issue with applicable URLs
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have reviewed the changes in a desktop view
  • I have reviewed the changes in a mobile view
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have assigned reviewers
  • I have run yarn generate:client and/or created a migration if I made backend changes that require them
  • My commit message(s) is/are polished, and any breaking changes are indicated in the message and are well-described
  • Commits made across packages purposefully have the same commit message/version change, else are separated into different commits

Reviewer Notes:

Steps to review a PR:

  • Read and understand the issue, and ensure the author has added QA notes
  • Review the code itself from a style point of view
  • Pull the changes down locally and test that the acceptance criteria is met
  • Also review the acceptance criteria on the Netlify deploy preview (noting that these do not yet include any backend changes made in the PR)
  • Either explicitly ask a clarifying question, request changes, or approve the PR if there are small remaining changes but the PR is otherwise good to go

On Merge:

If you have one commit and message, squash. If you need each message to be applied, rebase and merge.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 12, 2023

Deploy Preview for housing-sanjoseca-gov ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 81babb2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/housing-sanjoseca-gov/deploys/652862a66e1a9a00086b426e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-646--housing-sanjoseca-gov.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ColinBuyck ColinBuyck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yahooo 💚

@ludtkemorgan ludtkemorgan merged commit e2e3e7b into main Oct 12, 2023
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants