-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC6265bis: Offload Service Worker SFC computation to spec #2217
Conversation
This changes how 6265bis computes the Site for Cookies for Service Workers by referring to their spec instead of spelling it out locally.
@mikewest ping |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks reasonable from the perspective of the cookies spec, but I don't think the service worker spec actually says anything explicitly about this topic. Is there a PR underway, or did I miss the explanation?
@wanderview has a filed some issues tracking the work here w3c/ServiceWorker#1604 (reference) |
This changes how 6265bis computes the Site for Cookies for Service Workers by referring to their spec instead of spelling it out locally.
Can you file a new issue on the service worker spec to add a section discussing SFC computation? |
@mikewest |
@mikewest ping |
Hi, sorry. I've been a potato for the recent past, slowly recovering from covid. I'm happy to land this with the issue filed. |
Closes #1288
This changes how 6265bis computes the Site for Cookies for Service Workers by referring to their spec instead of spelling it out locally.
It's been some time since this was last discussed so while I think this was the agreed upon change I may be mistaken.