Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reinstate Tool Durability Preservation Config Option #174

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

augustsaintfreytag
Copy link

@augustsaintfreytag augustsaintfreytag commented Oct 8, 2024

This adds a persistent config option for the already included (and fully working) feature to preserve player tools when used to break blocks in Effortless. Solves: #173

In its current version, the setting will be permanently set to its assigned default which is 1, so no tools will ever break. Whatever the player sets in the in-game config will not be saved to the config file. As such, it can never be changed on the server, maybe not even in Singleplayer, I haven't actually tested that.

My pull request makes the following changes:

  • Adds a config options for builder/reservedToolDurability that stores the user setting and loads it with all the other settings on init.
  • Consequently allows players to use Effortless with tools breaking when used up instead of always being preserved.
  • Allows the use of other mods like "Ruined Equipment" to handle tool preservation.
  • Changes the default for tool preservation to 0 to let players opt in and not have tools kept around by default.

What I didn't change is bump the version number or anything, so feel free to make suggestions or have me merge this into another branch first.

Allow tools to break by default, let players set remainder.
Assuming tool preservation is a feature, let players opt in.
Assume players may be using mods like "Ruined Equipment" already.
Introduce new config key for "builder" key/values.
Let mod store user config setting for tool durability preservation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant