-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
Enhanced Redeem #990
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Enhanced Redeem #990
Conversation
Signed-off-by: bar haim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bar haim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bar haim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bar haim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bar haim <[email protected]>
if len(issuers) < 1 { | ||
return nil, nil, errors.New("no issuer found") | ||
} | ||
issuer := issuers[0] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can it be possible that there is more than one issuer? If so, how do we know which one we have to pick?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We assumed that it is enough for a single issuer to sign and if there are multiple we take the first. It's about the definition of the flow #890
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok I don't know about that, maybe @KElkhiyaoui or @adecaro can confirm :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good catch, Arne, we will need to fix this in coming PRs to let the user decide which issuer to choose.
Signed-off-by: bar haim <[email protected]>
First iteration completed using Extra Signers and Binding to pass the Issuer identity