Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Java off-chain data store sample using Fabric Gateway #749

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2022

Conversation

bestbeforetoday
Copy link
Member

@bestbeforetoday bestbeforetoday commented May 20, 2022

Also minor implementation changes to TypeScript sample for better consistency between implementations.

Contributes to hyperledger/fabric-gateway#190

@bestbeforetoday bestbeforetoday force-pushed the off-chain-data branch 2 times, most recently from baf249a to 512bd67 Compare May 20, 2022 13:39
Also minor implementation changes to TypeScript sample for better consistency between implementations.

Signed-off-by: Mark S. Lewis <[email protected]>
@bestbeforetoday bestbeforetoday marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2022 14:04
@bestbeforetoday bestbeforetoday requested a review from a team as a code owner May 20, 2022 14:04
import org.hyperledger.fabric.client.EndorseException;
import org.hyperledger.fabric.client.SubmitException;

public final class AssetTransferBasic {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be called something other than' AssetTransferBasic'?

To avoid confusion.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's the client application view of the asset-transfer-basic smart contract so the name seems reasonable to me, and aligns with the naming in the corresponding TypeScript sample:

I could change them both if you have a better name for them.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no; not got a better name ;-)

so long as it was a conscious decision 👍

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conscious but not necessarily a good one 🤣

@mbwhite mbwhite self-requested a review May 26, 2022 12:42
@mbwhite mbwhite merged commit 636a273 into hyperledger:main May 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants