Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Builder Codes #66

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Dec 23, 2024
Merged

Add Builder Codes #66

merged 16 commits into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

Frixoe
Copy link
Contributor

@Frixoe Frixoe commented Nov 28, 2024

I've added the initial builder codes approval code having referenced it from the python sdk and I think I'm missing something in the implementation related to my understanding of the builders code API.

When I tried running it initially I got a 422 and now I get a 403 but that's probably a personal environment issue. But would be great to get some feedback on the current implementation. Please ignore the info! lines.

Copy link
Contributor

@lmlmt lmlmt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change looks good. Mostly style nits

@Frixoe Frixoe requested a review from lmlmt November 30, 2024 14:08
@lmlmt
Copy link
Contributor

lmlmt commented Dec 2, 2024

This is marked as a draft. Did you test/is it ready to be merged?

@Frixoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Frixoe commented Dec 3, 2024

This is marked as a draft. Did you test/is it ready to be merged?

I'm in the process of adding the order_with_builder code too and testing that. Once those are done and tested, I will mark this ready for review and re-request a review.

@Frixoe Frixoe marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2024 08:02
@Frixoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Frixoe commented Dec 11, 2024

Hey @lmlmt, the code is ready for review and to be merged

Copy link
Contributor

@lmlmt lmlmt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly looks good, I don't think a separate BulkOrderWithBuilder is needed though

@Frixoe Frixoe requested a review from lmlmt December 23, 2024 16:47
@lmlmt
Copy link
Contributor

lmlmt commented Dec 23, 2024

@Frixoe Can you make sure it compiles? The continuous integration is now failing so would be good to make sure that's in a good spot before merging.

@Frixoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Frixoe commented Dec 23, 2024

@lmlmt sorry completely forget about my arch nemesis clippy

@lmlmt lmlmt merged commit 53608b5 into hyperliquid-dex:master Dec 23, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants