Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add workflow to mark issues and PRs as stale #724

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023
Merged

Add workflow to mark issues and PRs as stale #724

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

EricPedley
Copy link
Member

Summary

With this workflow, if an issue or PR has had no activity for 60 days, it will be marked as stale, which is basically a reminder for us to look at it again so nothing gets forgotten. It's 60 days because that's the default, if anyone has a compelling reason to change that I'd be down.

Test Plan

Just wait for it to mark something as stale 🤷‍♂️

@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from MinhxNguyen7 October 6, 2023 06:04
@KevinWu098
Copy link
Member

30 days wouldn't hurt tbh, would also probably be a good indicator since that's two "sprints" w/o any activity?

@MinhxNguyen7
Copy link
Member

MinhxNguyen7 commented Oct 8, 2023

30 days wouldn't hurt tbh, would also probably be a good indicator since that's two "sprints" w/o any activity?

I think that's not a bad idea for PRs because you shouldn't be idle on a PR for more than a month. Issues aren't necessarily stale after 30 days if no one's gotten to them, though. We don't move that quickly.

Copy link
Member

@MinhxNguyen7 MinhxNguyen7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@MinhxNguyen7 MinhxNguyen7 merged commit 9596f07 into main Oct 12, 2023
6 checks passed
@ap0nia ap0nia deleted the mark-stale branch November 8, 2023 21:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants