-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 745
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Translations for ja.yml through line 175 #1243
Translations for ja.yml through line 175 #1243
Conversation
Co-authored-by: kapipan <[email protected]>
Could you rebase from master? There are some new translations added related to the report feature. Sorry about that! |
@julianguyen yeah, I could rebase but I think that would be somewhat disruptive to the flow. Would it be better if I just merge master into ja-translations (and fix conflicts) and from ja-translations to the branch related to this review? I'd personally prefer to do any rebasing once we're near the end and I can just tidy up all commits prior to merging into master at that time. |
@matcha440 That works! :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a great start! Unfortunately didn't have a ton of time to review all translations, but I left a few comments as a first pass.
@nshki thank you for the initial feedback. I'll get these updated a little later today but had a question on one of them. |
Also resolve merge conflicts to add new reports section to ja.yml
Merging things in from master added some new entries, but I'll save those for later to keep the scope of this PR focused. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks again for these. Finally made a second pass, and left a few more comments. Would be great if you could have your wife take a look through this file's translations as well!
Description
I think the first 175 lines here were for the most part fairly straightforward, but I'm sure there are some mistakes. I put my wife's GitHub handle as co-author as she helped a little with some of these.
Corresponding Issue
Relates to #1215
Test Coverage
✅