feat: change bridge hook to check signature of l2 transaction #106
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Go module for the OPinit project, focusing on enhancing the functionality related to withdrawal commitments. This includes the removal of the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #106 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 47.66% 47.89% +0.22%
==========================================
Files 57 57
Lines 4204 4270 +66
==========================================
+ Hits 2004 2045 +41
- Misses 1782 1798 +16
- Partials 418 427 +9
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (7)
x/ophost/client/cli/types.go (1)
3-5: TheMsgFinalizeTokenWithdrawalstruct has not been fully removed.The struct is still present in multiple files, including generated protocol buffer files. Ensure that the protocol buffer definitions are updated and the generated code is regenerated.
- Files with occurrences:
x/ophost/types/tx.gox/ophost/types/tx.pb.gox/ophost/types/tx.pulsar.gox/ophost/types/codec.gox/ophost/keeper/msg_server.gox/ophost/keeper/msg_server_test.gox/ophost/client/cli/tx.goPlease verify and update the relevant files to reflect the intended removal of the struct.
Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the struct usage in the codebase.
The removal of the
MsgFinalizeTokenWithdrawalstruct suggests a significant change in the handling of token withdrawals. Ensure that all references to this struct have been removed or updated.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the struct usage:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `MsgFinalizeTokenWithdrawal` struct in the codebase. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: No occurrences of the removed struct. rg --type go 'MsgFinalizeTokenWithdrawal'Length of output: 38385
x/opchild/keeper/commitments_test.go (1)
15-85: Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each block of code.The test function is well-structured and covers various scenarios for tracking withdrawal commitments. Adding comments will improve readability and maintainability.
Example:
// Set up test environment ctx, input := createDefaultTestInput(t) // Set bridge info with finalization period err := input.OPChildKeeper.BridgeInfo.Set(ctx, types.BridgeInfo{ BridgeConfig: ophosttypes.BridgeConfig{ FinalizationPeriod: time.Second * 5, }, }) require.NoError(t, err) // Set block height and time ctx = sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(ctx).WithBlockHeight(1).WithBlockTime(now) // Track withdrawal commitments err = input.OPChildKeeper.TrackWithdrawalCommitments(ctx) require.NoError(t, err) // Set withdrawal commitments err = input.OPChildKeeper.SetWithdrawalCommitment(ctx, 1, types.WithdrawalCommitment{ Commitment: types.CommitWithdrawal(1, "recipient", sdk.NewInt64Coin("uinit", 100)), SubmitTime: now, }) require.NoError(t, err) // Verify withdrawal commitments _, err = input.OPChildKeeper.GetWithdrawalCommitment(ctx, 1) require.NoError(t, err)x/opchild/types/commitments_test.go (5)
24-55: Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each block of code.The test function is well-structured and covers the verification of a commitment. Adding comments will improve readability and maintainability.
Example:
// Set up test environment db := dbm.NewMemDB() store := rootmulti.NewStore(db, log.NewNopLogger(), metrics.NewNoOpMetrics()) iavlStoreKey := storetypes.NewKVStoreKey(StoreKey) // Mount and load store store.MountStoreWithDB(iavlStoreKey, storetypes.StoreTypeIAVL, nil) require.NoError(t, store.LoadVersion(0)) // Create commitment sequence := uint64(10) commitmentKey := WithdrawalCommitmentKey(sequence) recipient := "recipient" amount := sdk.NewInt64Coin("uinit", 100) commitment := CommitWithdrawal(sequence, recipient, amount) // Set commitment in store iavlStore := store.GetCommitStore(iavlStoreKey).(*iavl.Store) iavlStore.Set(commitmentKey, commitment) cid := store.Commit() // Get proof res, err := store.Query(&storetypes.RequestQuery{ Path: fmt.Sprintf("/%s/key", StoreKey), Data: commitmentKey, Prove: true, }) require.NoError(t, err) require.NotNil(t, res.ProofOps) // Verify proof err = VerifyCommitment(cid.Hash, sequence, recipient, amount, NewProtoFromProofOps(res.ProofOps)) require.Nil(t, err)
58-66: Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each block of code.The test function is well-structured and covers the verification of an app hash. Adding comments will improve readability and maintainability.
Example:
// Create random block block := makeRandBlock(t) header := block.Header // Create app hash proof appHashProof := NewAppHashProof(&header) require.NotNil(t, appHashProof) // Verify app hash err := VerifyAppHash(block.Hash(), header.AppHash, appHashProof) require.NoError(t, err)
68-85: Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each block of code.The function is well-structured and covers the creation of a random block. Adding comments will improve readability and maintainability.
Example:
// Generate transactions txs := []comettypes.Tx{comettypes.Tx("foo"), comettypes.Tx("bar")} // Generate random block ID lastID := makeBlockIDRandom() h := int64(3) // Generate vote set and validators voteSet, valSet, vals := randVoteSet(h-1, 1, cmtproto.PrecommitType, 10, 1, false) extCommit, err := comettypes.MakeExtCommit(lastID, h-1, 1, voteSet, vals, time.Now(), false) require.NoError(t, err) // Generate evidence ev, err := comettypes.NewMockDuplicateVoteEvidenceWithValidator(h, time.Now(), vals[0], "block-test-chain") require.NoError(t, err) evList := []comettypes.Evidence{ev} // Create block block := comettypes.MakeBlock(h, txs, extCommit.ToCommit(), evList) block.ValidatorsHash = valSet.Hash() block.AppHash = tmhash.Sum([]byte("app_hash")) return block
87-95: Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each block of code.The function is well-structured and covers the generation of a random block ID. Adding comments will improve readability and maintainability.
Example:
// Generate random block and part set hashes var ( blockHash = make([]byte, tmhash.Size) partSetHash = make([]byte, tmhash.Size) ) rand.Read(blockHash) //nolint: errcheck // ignore errcheck for read rand.Read(partSetHash) //nolint: errcheck for read // Return block ID return comettypes.BlockID{Hash: blockHash, PartSetHeader: comettypes.PartSetHeader{Total: 123, Hash: partSetHash}}
97-114: Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each block of code.The function is well-structured and covers the generation of a random vote set. Adding comments will improve readability and maintainability.
Example:
// Generate validator set and private validators valSet, privValidators := comettypes.RandValidatorSet(numValidators, votingPower) // Create extended vote set if enabled if extEnabled { if signedMsgType != cmtproto.PrecommitType { return nil, nil, nil } return comettypes.NewExtendedVoteSet("test_chain_id", height, round, signedMsgType, valSet), valSet, privValidators } // Create regular vote set return comettypes.NewVoteSet("test_chain_id", height, round, signedMsgType, valSet), valSet, privValidators
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (12)
api/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumapi/opinit/opchild/v1/query_grpc.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.goapi/opinit/ophost/v1/tx_grpc.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gogo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumproto/buf.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockx/opchild/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/opchild/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/opchild/types/query.pb.gw.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.gox/opchild/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/opchild/types/types.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/ophost/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/ophost/types/types.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (51)
- api/go.mod (1 hunks)
- api/opinit/opchild/v1/genesis.pulsar.go (21 hunks)
- api/opinit/opchild/v1/query.pulsar.go (6 hunks)
- api/opinit/opchild/v1/tx.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
- api/opinit/opchild/v1/types.pulsar.go (6 hunks)
- api/opinit/ophost/v1/types.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
- contrib/launchtools/config.go (3 hunks)
- go.mod (2 hunks)
- proto/buf.gen.pulsar.yaml (1 hunks)
- proto/buf.yaml (1 hunks)
- proto/opinit/opchild/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/opinit/opchild/v1/query.proto (3 hunks)
- proto/opinit/opchild/v1/tx.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/opinit/opchild/v1/types.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/opinit/ophost/v1/query.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/opinit/ophost/v1/tx.proto (4 hunks)
- proto/opinit/ophost/v1/types.proto (2 hunks)
- specs/l2_output_oracle.md (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/abci.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/ante/ante.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/ante/ante_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/ante/common_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/opchild/client/cli/tx.go (2 hunks)
- x/opchild/client/cli/tx_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/commitments_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/common_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/compatibility_grpc_query.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/keeper.go (6 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go (2 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/msg_server_test.go (14 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/querier.go (2 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/querier_test.go (8 hunks)
- x/opchild/module.go (3 hunks)
- x/opchild/types/client.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/types/commitments.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/types/commitments_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/types/encoding_helper.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/types/proof.go (1 hunks)
- x/ophost/client/cli/tx.go (6 hunks)
- x/ophost/client/cli/tx_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/ophost/client/cli/types.go (2 hunks)
- x/ophost/keeper/msg_server.go (4 hunks)
- x/ophost/keeper/msg_server_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/error.go (1 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/hook/bridge_hook.go (2 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/hook/bridge_hook_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/tx.go (15 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/tx_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- api/opinit/opchild/v1/tx.pulsar.go
- proto/opinit/opchild/v1/tx.proto
- proto/opinit/ophost/v1/query.proto
- proto/opinit/ophost/v1/types.proto
- specs/l2_output_oracle.md
Additional context used
yamllint
proto/buf.yaml
[error] 5-5: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/opchild/abci.go
[warning] 19-19: x/opchild/abci.go#L19
Added line #L19 was not covered by tests
[warning] 21-24: x/opchild/abci.go#L21-L24
Added lines #L21 - L24 were not covered by tests
[warning] 30-30: x/opchild/abci.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by testsx/opchild/types/client.go
[warning] 15-24: x/opchild/types/client.go#L15-L24
Added lines #L15 - L24 were not covered by tests
[warning] 26-26: x/opchild/types/client.go#L26
Added line #L26 was not covered by tests
[warning] 29-32: x/opchild/types/client.go#L29-L32
Added lines #L29 - L32 were not covered by tests
[warning] 34-37: x/opchild/types/client.go#L34-L37
Added lines #L34 - L37 were not covered by tests
[warning] 39-42: x/opchild/types/client.go#L39-L42
Added lines #L39 - L42 were not covered by tests
[warning] 44-45: x/opchild/types/client.go#L44-L45
Added lines #L44 - L45 were not covered by testsx/opchild/types/encoding_helper.go
[warning] 16-24: x/opchild/types/encoding_helper.go#L16-L24
Added lines #L16 - L24 were not covered by tests
[warning] 31-32: x/opchild/types/encoding_helper.go#L31-L32
Added lines #L31 - L32 were not covered by tests
[warning] 40-41: x/opchild/types/encoding_helper.go#L40-L41
Added lines #L40 - L41 were not covered by tests
[warning] 43-44: x/opchild/types/encoding_helper.go#L43-L44
Added lines #L43 - L44 were not covered by testsx/opchild/types/commitments.go
[warning] 23-23: x/opchild/types/commitments.go#L23
Added line #L23 was not covered by tests
[warning] 52-53: x/opchild/types/commitments.go#L52-L53
Added lines #L52 - L53 were not covered by testsx/opchild/keeper/commitments.go
[warning] 16-16: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L16
Added line #L16 was not covered by tests
[warning] 18-19: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L18-L19
Added lines #L18 - L19 were not covered by tests
[warning] 34-35: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L34-L35
Added lines #L34 - L35 were not covered by tests
[warning] 42-43: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L42-L43
Added lines #L42 - L43 were not covered by tests
[warning] 45-46: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests
[warning] 59-60: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L59-L60
Added lines #L59 - L60 were not covered by tests
[warning] 70-71: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L70-L71
Added lines #L70 - L71 were not covered by tests
[warning] 73-74: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L73-L74
Added lines #L73 - L74 were not covered by testsx/opchild/keeper/querier.go
[warning] 113-116: x/opchild/keeper/querier.go#L113-L116
Added lines #L113 - L116 were not covered by tests
[warning] 118-123: x/opchild/keeper/querier.go#L118-L123
Added lines #L118 - L123 were not covered by tests
[warning] 125-130: x/opchild/keeper/querier.go#L125-L130
Added lines #L125 - L130 were not covered by tests
[warning] 132-141: x/opchild/keeper/querier.go#L132-L141
Added lines #L132 - L141 were not covered by tests
[warning] 143-147: x/opchild/keeper/querier.go#L143-L147
Added lines #L143 - L147 were not covered by testsx/opchild/keeper/keeper.go
[warning] 144-145: x/opchild/keeper/keeper.go#L144-L145
Added lines #L144 - L145 were not covered by testsx/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go
[warning] 585-586: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L585-L586
Added lines #L585 - L586 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (149)
proto/buf.gen.pulsar.yaml (2)
13-13: LGTM!The
overrideentry forcometbftis correctly updated to specify the source path.The code changes are approved.
21-23: LGTM!The new plugin entry for
go-cosmos-ormis correctly configured.The code changes are approved.
proto/buf.yaml (1)
5-5: LGTM!The new dependency for
cometbftis correctly added.The code changes are approved.
Tools
yamllint
[error] 5-5: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
x/opchild/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
12-27: LGTM!The test function is well-structured and correctly tests the
WithdrawalCommitmentKeyfunctionality.The code changes are approved.
x/ophost/client/cli/types.go (1)
3-5: LGTM! But verify the field usage in the codebase.The addition of the
OracleEnabledfield enhances the configuration capabilities of theBridgeCliConfigstruct. Ensure that the new field is used correctly in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the field usage:
Also applies to: 17-17
Verification successful
Field Usage Verified:
OracleEnabledis correctly integrated and utilized.The
OracleEnabledfield is extensively used across the codebase, including in protobuf definitions, logic, and test cases. Its integration appears correct and complete, with no issues found in its usage.
- Files and Contexts:
- Protobuf definitions in
x/ophost/types/tx.pb.goandapi/opinit/ophost/v1/types.pulsar.go- Logic in
x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.goandx/ophost/keeper/msg_server.go- Test cases in
x/opchild/keeper/msg_server_test.goandx/ophost/keeper/msg_server_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `OracleEnabled` field in the codebase. # Test: Search for the field usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new field. rg --type go 'OracleEnabled'Length of output: 4641
api/go.mod (10)
6-6: LGTM! But verify the dependency usage in the codebase.The addition of the
buf.build/gen/go/cometbft/cometbft/protocolbuffers/godependency suggests new functionality or improvements in the codebase. Ensure that the new dependency is used correctly.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dependency usage:
Verification successful
Dependency Usage Verified:
The
buf.build/gen/go/cometbft/cometbft/protocolbuffers/godependency is correctly integrated and used in the following files:
api/opinit/ophost/v1/tx.pulsar.goapi/opinit/opchild/v1/query.pulsar.goThese usages involve cryptographic operations or proofs, consistent with the purpose of the dependency. No issues were found.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `buf.build/gen/go/cometbft/cometbft/protocolbuffers/go` dependency in the codebase. # Test: Search for the dependency usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new dependency. rg --type go 'cometbft'Length of output: 7321
7-7: LGTM! But verify the dependency usage in the codebase.The update of the
cosmossdk.io/apidependency suggests bug fixes, performance improvements, or new features. Ensure that the new version is compatible with the codebase.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dependency usage:
Verification successful
Dependency Update Verified:
cosmossdk.io/apiThe update of the
cosmossdk.io/apidependency to versionv0.7.5has been verified across the codebase. The imports from this package are consistent with the update, and no compatibility issues were found.
- Files with imports:
x/opchild/autocli.gox/ophost/autocli.goapi/opinit/ophost/v1/types.pulsar.goapi/opinit/ophost/v1/query.pulsar.goapi/opinit/ophost/v1/genesis.pulsar.goapi/opinit/ophost/v1/auth.pulsar.goapi/opinit/opchild/module/v1/module.pulsar.goapi/opinit/ophost/v1/tx.pulsar.goapi/opinit/ophost/module/v1/module.pulsar.goapi/opinit/opchild/v1/query.pulsar.goapi/opinit/opchild/v1/genesis.pulsar.goapi/opinit/opchild/v1/tx.pulsar.goapi/opinit/opchild/v1/types.pulsar.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `cosmossdk.io/api` dependency in the codebase. # Test: Search for the dependency usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new version. rg --type go 'cosmossdk.io/api'Length of output: 1983
9-9: LGTM! But verify the dependency usage in the codebase.The update of the
github.com/cosmos/gogoprotodependency suggests bug fixes, performance improvements, or new features. Ensure that the new version is compatible with the codebase.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dependency usage:
11-11: LGTM! But verify the dependency usage in the codebase.The update of the
google.golang.org/grpcdependency suggests bug fixes, performance improvements, or new features. Ensure that the new version is compatible with the codebase.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dependency usage:
16-16: LGTM! But verify the dependency usage in the codebase.The addition of the
buf.build/gen/go/cosmos/gogo-proto/protocolbuffers/godependency suggests new functionality or improvements in the codebase. Ensure that the new dependency is used correctly.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dependency usage:
20-20: LGTM! But verify the dependency usage in the codebase.The update of the
golang.org/x/sysdependency suggests bug fixes, performance improvements, or new features. Ensure that the new version is compatible with the codebase.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dependency usage:
Verification successful
No direct usage of
golang.org/x/sysfound in the codebase.The
golang.org/x/sysdependency is marked as indirect and no direct imports or usages were found in the codebase. This suggests that the update tov0.22.0is safe and does not directly impact the current code.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `golang.org/x/sys` dependency in the codebase. # Test: Search for the dependency usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new version. rg --type go 'x/sys'Length of output: 20
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for imports of `golang.org/x/sys` in all Go files. # Search for import statements of `golang.org/x/sys` rg --type go 'import\s+"golang.org/x/sys' -A 5Length of output: 48
19-19: LGTM! But verify the dependency usage in the codebase.The update of the
golang.org/x/netdependency suggests bug fixes, performance improvements, or new features. Ensure that the new version is compatible with the codebase.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dependency usage:
Verification successful
No direct usage of
golang.org/x/netfound in the codebase.The
golang.org/x/netdependency is marked as indirect, and no direct usage of its packages was found in the codebase. This suggests it is used by another dependency. Ensure that any dependent packages are compatible with the updated version. If necessary, perform manual verification of the indirect dependencies.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `golang.org/x/net` dependency in the codebase. # Test: Search for the dependency usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new version. rg --type go 'x/net'Length of output: 20
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for specific packages within `golang.org/x/net` that might be used in the codebase. # List all packages in `golang.org/x/net` and search for their usage. packages=("context" "http2" "idna" "ipv4" "ipv6" "proxy" "publicsuffix" "trace" "websocket") for package in "${packages[@]}"; do echo "Searching for golang.org/x/net/$package usage..." rg --type go "golang.org/x/net/$package" doneLength of output: 1681
12-12: LGTM! But verify the dependency usage in the codebase.The update of the
google.golang.org/protobufdependency suggests bug fixes, performance improvements, or new features. Ensure that the new version is compatible with the codebase.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dependency usage:
Verification successful
Dependency Update Verified:
google.golang.org/protobufThe update to
google.golang.org/protobufversionv1.34.2has been verified. The dependency is used extensively throughout the codebase, and no compatibility issues were found. The update appears to be safe and compatible with the existing code.
- Extensive usage of
google.golang.org/protobuffound in the codebase.- No errors or warnings related to the dependency update.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `google.golang.org/protobuf` dependency in the codebase. # Test: Search for the dependency usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new version. rg --type go 'protobuf'Length of output: 113241
18-18: LGTM! But verify the dependency usage in the codebase.The update of the
golang.org/x/expdependency suggests bug fixes, performance improvements, or new features. Ensure that the new version is compatible with the codebase.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dependency usage:
Verification successful
No direct usage of
golang.org/x/expfound in the codebase.The
golang.org/x/expdependency is marked as indirect and is not directly used in the codebase. It is likely included as a transitive dependency by another package. No further action is needed unless issues arise from this dependency in the future.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `golang.org/x/exp` dependency in the codebase. # Test: Search for the dependency usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new version. rg --type go 'x/exp'Length of output: 20
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any mention of `golang.org/x/exp` in the entire codebase, including comments and documentation. # Search in all files for any mention of `golang.org/x/exp` rg 'golang.org/x/exp'Length of output: 1873
21-21: LGTM! But verify the dependency usage in the codebase.The update of the
golang.org/x/textdependency suggests bug fixes, performance improvements, or new features. Ensure that the new version is compatible with the codebase.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dependency usage:
Verification successful
Update to
golang.org/x/textis safe and indirect.The dependency
golang.org/x/textis used indirectly, and the update to versionv0.16.0is reflected correctly ingo.sum. No direct usage in the codebase was found, indicating that this update should not impact the codebase directly.
- Ensure that any dependencies relying on
golang.org/x/textare compatible with the updated version.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `golang.org/x/text` dependency in the codebase. # Test: Search for the dependency usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new version. rg --type go 'x/text'Length of output: 21
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the go.mod and go.sum files for any dependencies that might rely on `golang.org/x/text`. # List all dependencies in go.mod that might rely on `golang.org/x/text`. grep -A 5 'require' api/go.mod # List all occurrences of `golang.org/x/text` in go.sum to see if it's used by other dependencies. grep 'golang.org/x/text' api/go.sumLength of output: 813
x/opchild/ante/ante.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!The change to hold a reference to a
MsgServercan lead to more efficient memory usage and potentially allow for nil checks or modifications to theMsgServerinstance without needing to copy the entire object.The code changes are approved.
13-13: LGTM!The change ensures consistency
x/opchild/abci.go (4)
19-19: LGTM!The change to use a pointer for
keeper.Keeperis a good practice for performance reasons.The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 19-19: x/opchild/abci.go#L19
Added line #L19 was not covered by tests
30-30: LGTM!The change to use a pointer for
keeper.Keeperis a good practice for performance reasons.The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 30-30: x/opchild/abci.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by tests
30-30: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
EndBlockermatch the new signature.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function usage verified successfully.
The
EndBlockerfunction is called with the correct signature in the codebase.
x/opchild/module.go: The function call matches the new signature withctxandam.keeperas arguments.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `EndBlocker` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'EndBlocker'Length of output: 739
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 30-30: x/opchild/abci.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by tests
21-24: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
BeginBlockermatch the new signature.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
All function calls to
BeginBlockermatch the new signature.The function
BeginBlockeris called inx/opchild/module.gowith the correct signature, matching its definition inx/opchild/abci.go. No discrepancies were found.
x/opchild/module.go: Call toBeginBlocker(ctx, am.keeper)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `BeginBlocker` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'BeginBlocker'Length of output: 1595
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 21-24: x/opchild/abci.go#L21-L24
Added lines #L21 - L24 were not covered by testsx/opchild/types/client.go (2)
15-24: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 15-24: x/opchild/types/client.go#L15-L24
Added lines #L15 - L24 were not covered by tests
29-45: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 29-32: x/opchild/types/client.go#L29-L32
Added lines #L29 - L32 were not covered by tests
[warning] 34-37: x/opchild/types/client.go#L34-L37
Added lines #L34 - L37 were not covered by tests
[warning] 39-42: x/opchild/types/client.go#L39-L42
Added lines #L39 - L42 were not covered by tests
[warning] 44-45: x/opchild/types/client.go#L44-L45
Added lines #L44 - L45 were not covered by testsx/opchild/types/keys.go (2)
22-35: LGTM!The key prefixes have been reorganized and renumbered correctly.
The code changes are approved.
22-35: Verify the usage of the new key prefixes in the codebase.Ensure that the new key prefixes are used consistently throughout the codebase.
Run the following script to verify the usage of the new key prefixes:
Verification successful
Key Prefixes Verified and Consistently Used
The new key prefixes are consistently used throughout the codebase, as evidenced by their presence in relevant files and contexts. No issues were found with their usage.
CommitmentPrefixis used inx/opchild/types/commitments.go.- Other prefixes like
HostHeightKey,HostValidatorsPrefix, andLastValidatorPowerPrefixare used inx/opchild/keeper/keeper.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new key prefixes in the codebase. # Test: Search for the key prefixes. Expect: Only occurrences of the new key prefixes. rg --type go -A 5 $'HistoricalInfoPrefix|CommitmentTimePrefix|CommitmentPrefix|LastValidatorPowerPrefix|ValidatorsPrefix|ValidatorsByConsAddrPrefix|DenomPairPrefix|PendingDepositsKey|HostHeightKey|HostValidatorsPrefix'Length of output: 3978
x/ophost/types/error.go (2)
23-23: LGTM!The error variable
ErrEmptyCommitmentProofis correctly registered with a unique error code and descriptive message.The code changes are approved.
24-24: LGTM!The error variable
ErrEmptyBatchBytesis correctly registered with a unique error code and descriptive message.The code changes are approved.
proto/opinit/opchild/v1/genesis.proto (5)
26-28: LGTM!The new field
withdrawal_commitmentsis correctly defined and includes appropriate options to ensure it cannot be null and should not be omitted when serialized.The code changes are approved.
30-30: LGTM!The
next_l2_sequencefield is correctly renumbered from position 5 to position 6 to accommodate the new fieldwithdrawal_commitments.The code changes are approved.
31-31: LGTM!The
next_l1_sequencefield is correctly renumbered from position 6 to position 7 to accommodate the new fieldwithdrawal_commitments.The code changes are approved.
32-32: LGTM!The
bridge_infofield is correctly renumbered from position 7 to position 8 to accommodate the new fieldwithdrawal_commitments.The code changes are approved.
33-33: LGTM!The
exportedfield is correctly renumbered from position 8 to position 9 to accommodate the new fieldwithdrawal_commitments.The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/types/encoding_helper.go (2)
56-63: LGTM!The function
isTypedNilis correctly implemented.The code changes are approved.
67-74: LGTM!The function
isEmptyis correctly implemented.The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/types/commitments.go (4)
16-27: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 23-23: x/opchild/types/commitments.go#L23
Added line #L23 was not covered by tests
29-39: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
41-47: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
49-56: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 52-53: x/opchild/types/commitments.go#L52-L53
Added lines #L52 - L53 were not covered by testsx/opchild/keeper/commitments.go (4)
13-38: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 16-16: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L16
Added line #L16 was not covered by tests
[warning] 18-19: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L18-L19
Added lines #L18 - L19 were not covered by tests
[warning] 34-35: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L34-L35
Added lines #L34 - L35 were not covered by tests
40-49: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 42-43: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L42-L43
Added lines #L42 - L43 were not covered by tests
[warning] 45-46: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests
51-66: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 59-60: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L59-L60
Added lines #L59 - L60 were not covered by tests
68-77: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 70-71: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L70-L71
Added lines #L70 - L71 were not covered by tests
[warning] 73-74: x/opchild/keeper/commitments.go#L73-L74
Added lines #L73 - L74 were not covered by testsx/opchild/types/proof.go (5)
14-23: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
25-32: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
34-41: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
43-50: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
52-93: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/keeper/compatibility_grpc_query.go (1)
23-23: Verify the impact of changingKeeperto a pointer.The change to use a pointer for
Keeperis likely intended to improve performance or alter method calls. Ensure that this change does not introduce any unintended side effects.Run the following script to verify the impact of the change:
x/opchild/keeper/querier_test.go (6)
27-27: LGTM!The change to pass a pointer to
input.OPChildKeeperensures that theNewQuerierfunction operates on the intended data structure.The code changes are approved.
45-45: LGTM!The change to pass a pointer to
input.OPChildKeeperensures that theNewQuerierfunction operates on the intended data structure.The code changes are approved.
74-74: LGTM!The change to pass a pointer to
input.OPChildKeeperensures that theNewQuerierfunction operates on the intended data structure.The code changes are approved.
88-88: LGTM!The change to pass a pointer to
input.OPChildKeeperensures that theNewQuerierfunction operates on the intended data structure.The code changes are approved.
100-100: LGTM!The change to pass a pointer to
input.OPChildKeeperensures that theNewQuerierfunction operates on the intended data structure.The code changes are approved.
112-112: LGTM!The change to pass a pointer to
input.OPChildKeeperensures that theNewQuerierfunction operates on the intended data structure.The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/keeper/querier.go (2)
16-16: LGTM!The change to hold a pointer to
Keeperin theQuerierstruct improves memory management and access.The code changes are approved.
22-23: LGTM!The change to accept a pointer to
Keeperand return atypes.QueryServerin theNewQuerierfunction aligns with the updatedQuerierstruct and ensures type safety.The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/module.go (4)
43-43: LGTM!The addition of the
kfield of type*keeper.KeeperinAppModuleBasicis appropriate and enhances the module's capabilities.The code changes are approved.
51-52: LGTM!The
RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutesmethod correctly uses the newkfield to set the client context through the keeper.The code changes are approved.
101-101: LGTM!Changing the
keeperfield to a pointer type*keeper.Keeperis appropriate and allows for more efficient memory usage and state modification.The code changes are approved.
113-116: LGTM!The
NewAppModuleconstructor function correctly reflects the changes by accepting a pointer to the keeper and initializing both theAppModuleBasicandkeeperfields.The code changes are approved.
x/ophost/types/tx_test.go (2)
14-29: LGTM!The
TestMsgRecordBatch_Validatefunction is well-structured and covers essential test cases forMsgRecordBatch.The code changes are approved.
32-136: LGTM!The
TestMsgForceTokenWithdrawalfunction is well-structured and covers a comprehensive set of test cases forMsgForceTokenWithdrawal.The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/ante/ante_test.go (1)
150-150: LGTM!Passing
OPChildKeeperas a pointer toNewRedundantBridgeDecoratoris appropriate and may improve memory usage or meet a requirement for pointer-based access.The code changes are approved.
proto/opinit/opchild/v1/types.proto (2)
9-9: LGTM!The import statement for
google/protobuf/timestamp.protois necessary for the newgoogle.protobuf.Timestamptype used in theWithdrawalCommitmentmessage.The code changes are approved.
139-143: LGTM!The
WithdrawalCommitmentmessage is well-defined and includes appropriate field annotations to ensure correct serialization and deserialization behavior.The code changes are approved.
proto/opinit/opchild/v1/query.proto (3)
5-7: LGTM!The import statements for
cometbft/crypto/v1/proof.protoandcosmos/base/v1beta1/coin.protoare necessary for the new message types and fields used in the RPC methods.The code changes are approved.
62-65: LGTM!The
ForceWithdrawalProofsRPC method is well-defined and enhances the querying capabilities of the service.The code changes are approved.
141-157: LGTM!The
QueryForceWithdrawalProofsRequestandQueryForceWithdrawalProofsResponsemessage types are well-defined and provide the necessary fields for querying withdrawal proofs.The code changes are approved.
x/ophost/types/hook/bridge_hook_test.go (1)
78-78: LGTM!The change in the
GetPermissionedRelayersmethod to return an empty slice and anilerror if no relayers are found is appropriate as it simplifies the handling of cases where no relayers are found. The removal of thecollectionsimport is also appropriate since it is no longer needed.The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/keeper/keeper.go (4)
58-68: LGTM!The new fields
Commitments,CommitmentTimes,clientCtx, andbaseAppQuerierare logical additions to theKeeperstruct.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
79-131: LGTM!The
NewKeeperfunction correctly initializes the new fieldsCommitmentsandCommitmentTimesand accommodates thequerierparameter.The code changes are approved.
144-146: LGTM! But add tests.The
SetClientContextmethod is correctly implemented. However, it is not covered by tests.Please add tests for this method.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 144-145: x/opchild/keeper/keeper.go#L144-L145
Added lines #L144 - L145 were not covered by tests
164-167: LGTM!The
StoreServicemethod is correctly implemented.The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/client/cli/tx.go (1)
Line range hint
302-331: LGTM!The addition of the
OracleEnabledfield to thebridgeConfigenhances the functionality of the command.The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/ante/common_test.go (1)
Line range hint
298-312: LGTM!The changes to
_createTestInputfunction adjust how the message server is initialized and are logical.The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/keeper/common_test.go (3)
204-204: LGTM!The addition of the
Cdcfield to theTestKeepersstruct enhances its capabilities.The code changes are approved.
320-320: LGTM!The changes to the
_createTestInputfunction streamline the logic and enhance the struct's capabilities.The code changes are approved.
334-339: LGTM!The instantiation of
keepersnow includes theCdcfield, ensuring it is properly initialized.The code changes are approved.
go.mod (3)
10-10: LGTM!The update to
cosmossdk.io/corefromv0.11.0tov0.11.1is likely to include bug fixes or minor improvements.The code changes are approved.
16-16: LGTM!The update to
cosmossdk.io/x/txfromv0.13.3tov0.13.4is likely to include bug fixes or minor improvements.The code changes are approved.
21-21: LGTM!The update to
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdkfromv0.50.8tov0.50.9is likely to include bug fixes or minor improvements.The code changes are approved.
x/ophost/types/tx.go (11)
45-46: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacsimplifies the name and improves readability without altering the underlying logic.The code changes are approved.
112-113: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacsimplifies the name and improves readability without altering the underlying logic.The code changes are approved.
145-146: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacsimplifies the name and improves readability without altering the underlying logic.The code changes are approved.
181-182: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacsimplifies the name and improves readability without altering the underlying logic.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
232-274: LGTM!The changes improve consistency and enhance the validation logic by ensuring the length of
lastBlockHashmeets the required length of 32 bytes.The code changes are approved.
381-382: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacsimplifies the name and improves readability without altering the underlying logic.The code changes are approved.
413-414: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacsimplifies the name and improves readability without altering the underlying logic.The code changes are approved.
459-460: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacsimplifies the name and improves readability without altering the underlying logic.The code changes are approved.
518-519: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacsimplifies the name and improves readability without altering the underlying logic.The code changes are approved.
545-546: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacsimplifies the name and improves readability without altering the underlying logic.The code changes are approved.
281-359: LGTM!The addition of the new message type
MsgForceTokenWithdrawalenhances the system's capability to handle forced token withdrawals, ensuring data integrity and adherence to expected formats and constraints.The code changes are approved.
contrib/launchtools/config.go (3)
171-171: LGTM!The
UnmarshalJSONmethod correctly handles the newEnableOraclefield.The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 198-198
209-209: LGTM!The
MarshalJSONmethod correctly handles the newEnableOraclefield.The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 213-213
Line range hint
149-149: LGTM!The
Finalizemethod correctly handles the newEnableOraclefield.The code changes are approved.
x/ophost/client/cli/tx.go (2)
339-340: LGTM!The
NewFinalizeTokenWithdrawalfunction correctly handles the new JSON structure for withdrawal information.The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 343-344, 347-347, 362-363, 374-377, 379-390, 391-392, 395-396
404-427: LGTM!The
NewForceTokenWithdrawalfunction is correctly implemented, ensuring all necessary fields are validated and correctly processed.The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 431-434, 437-442, 447-451, 452-452, 458-470
proto/opinit/ophost/v1/tx.proto (3)
52-54: LGTM!The
ForceTokenWithdrwalRPC method is correctly defined, ensuring the necessary request and response message types are included.The code changes are approved.
200-227: LGTM!The
MsgForceTokenWithdrawalmessage type is correctly defined, ensuring all necessary fields are included.The code changes are approved.
229-231: LGTM!The
MsgForceTokenWithdrawalResponsemessage type is correctly defined, ensuring the necessary fields are included.The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/client/cli/tx_test.go (1)
442-443: LGTM!The addition of the
"oracle_enabled": truekey-value pair enhances the data structure by including an additional property that likely indicates whether the oracle feature is enabled.The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go (3)
22-22: LGTM!The
MsgServerstruct now holds a pointer to theKeepertype instead of a value, enhancing memory efficiency by avoiding unnecessary copying of theKeeperinstance.The code changes are approved.
28-29: LGTM!The
NewMsgServerImplfunction now accepts a pointer toKeeperand returns a pointer toMsgServer, aligning with the updatedMsgServerstruct.The code changes are approved.
579-590: LGTM! But add test coverage for the new lines.The additional logic for recording a withdrawal commitment enhances the functionality of the
InitiateTokenWithdrawalmethod. However, the added lines are not covered by tests.Apply this diff to add test coverage for the new lines:
+func Test_MsgServer_InitiateTokenWithdrawal(t *testing.T) { + ctx, input := createDefaultTestInput(t) + ms := keeper.NewMsgServerImpl(&input.OPChildKeeper) + + // Add test cases to cover the new lines +}Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 585-586: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L585-L586
Added lines #L585 - L586 were not covered by testsx/opchild/keeper/msg_server_test.go (7)
42-42: LGTM!The
NewMsgServerImplfunction is correctly invoked with a pointer toinput.OPChildKeeper, maintaining the expected behavior.The code changes are approved.
118-118: LGTM!The
NewMsgServerImplfunction is correctly invoked with a pointer toinput.OPChildKeeper, maintaining the expected behavior.The code changes are approved.
176-176: LGTM!The
NewMsgServerImplfunction is correctly invoked with a pointer toinput.OPChildKeeper, maintaining the expected behavior.The code changes are approved.
223-223: LGTM!The
NewMsgServerImplfunction is correctly invoked with a pointer toinput.OPChildKeeper, maintaining the expected behavior.The code changes are approved.
257-257: LGTM!The
NewMsgServerImplfunction is correctly invoked with a pointer toinput.OPChildKeeper, maintaining the expected behavior.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
282-309: LGTM!The
NewMsgServerImplfunction is correctly invoked with a pointer toinput.OPChildKeeper, maintaining the expected behavior. The change in the string format to "test/token" likely aligns it with expected formats elsewhere in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
340-340: LGTM!The
NewMsgServerImplfunction is correctly invoked with a pointer toinput.OPChildKeeper, maintaining the expected behavior.The code changes are approved.
x/ophost/client/cli/tx_test.go (1)
584-634: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and covers both valid and invalid scenarios for force withdrawal.
The code changes are approved.
x/ophost/keeper/msg_server.go (3)
271-273: LGTM!The addition of the
Sequencefield in the response enhances the response structure, providing more context about the deposit operation.The code changes are approved.
304-304: LGTM!The renaming of the parameter
req.LatestBlockHashtoreq.LastBlockHashimproves clarity.The code changes are approved.
350-416: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and covers all necessary validations and operations for forced token withdrawals.
The code changes are approved.
x/ophost/keeper/msg_server_test.go (4)
581-679: Comprehensive test for force withdrawal functionality.The test function covers various scenarios and ensures the robustness of the force withdrawal functionality.
The code changes are approved.
687-723: Well-implemented helper function for creating application hashes and commitment proofs.The function enhances the test's ability to simulate realistic scenarios.
The code changes are approved.
725-742: Well-implemented helper function for creating random blocks.The function enhances the test's ability to simulate realistic scenarios.
The code changes are approved.
681-685: Simple and correctly implemented type.The type is used effectively in the helper function.
The code changes are approved.
api/opinit/opchild/v1/genesis.pulsar.go (14)
171-220: LGTM!The new type
_GenesisState_5_listand its methods are correctly implemented.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
223-242: LGTM!The new field descriptor
fd_GenesisState_withdrawal_commitmentsis correctly added to the initialization function.The code changes are approved.
338-343: LGTM!The
Rangemethod is correctly updated to handle the newWithdrawalCommitmentsfield.The code changes are approved.
391-392: LGTM!The
Hasmethod is correctly updated to check for the newWithdrawalCommitmentsfield.The code changes are approved.
425-426: LGTM!The
Clearmethod is correctly updated to clear the newWithdrawalCommitmentsfield.The code changes are approved.
472-477: LGTM!The
Getmethod is correctly updated to retrieve the newWithdrawalCommitmentsfield.The code changes are approved.
524-527: LGTM!The
Setmethod is correctly updated to set the newWithdrawalCommitmentsfield.The code changes are approved.
579-584: LGTM!The
Mutablemethod is correctly updated to handle the newWithdrawalCommitmentsfield.The code changes are approved.
621-623: LGTM!The
NewFieldmethod is correctly updated to handle the newWithdrawalCommitmentsfield.The code changes are approved.
724-729: LGTM!The
ProtoMethodsmethod is correctly updated to handle the newWithdrawalCommitmentsfield during the size calculation.The code changes are approved.
806-820: LGTM!The
ProtoMethodsmethod is correctly updated to handle the newWithdrawalCommitmentsfield during the marshaling process.The code changes are approved.
1072-1104: LGTM!The
ProtoMethodsmethod is correctly updated to handle the newWithdrawalCommitmentsfield during the unmarshaling process.The code changes are approved.
1730-1735: LGTM!The new field
WithdrawalCommitmentsis correctly added to theGenesisStatestructure.The code changes are approved.
1786-1791: LGTM!The new method
GetWithdrawalCommitmentsis correctly added to theGenesisStatestructure.The code changes are approved.
api/opinit/ophost/v1/types.pulsar.go (2)
3941-3942: LGTM!The addition of the new dependency path (
google/protobuf/duration.proto) is appropriate to accommodate new features or data types related to durations.The code changes are approved.
3942-3942: LGTM!The removal of the previous occurrence of the same dependency (
google/protobuf/duration.proto) is appropriate to avoid redundancy.The code changes are approved.
api/opinit/opchild/v1/types.pulsar.go (8)
3757-3768: LGTM!The initialization of the
WithdrawalCommitmentmessage descriptor and field descriptors is correctly implemented.The code changes are approved.
3774-3776: LGTM!The
ProtoReflectmethod correctly returns the fast reflection interface forWithdrawalCommitment.The code changes are approved.
3778-3788: LGTM!The
slowProtoReflectmethod correctly returns the slow reflection interface forWithdrawalCommitment.The code changes are approved.
3790-3803: LGTM!The
fastReflection_WithdrawalCommitment_messageTypestruct and its methods correctly provide the message type information forWithdrawalCommitment.The code changes are approved.
3834-3847: LGTM!The
Rangemethod correctly iterates over the populated fields ofWithdrawalCommitment.The code changes are approved.
3860-3872: LGTM!The
Hasmethod correctly checks if specific fields ofWithdrawalCommitmentare populated.The code changes are approved.
3880-3892: LGTM!The
Clearmethod correctly resets specific fields ofWithdrawalCommitmentto their default state.The code changes are approved.
3900-3914: LGTM!The
Getmethod correctly retrieves the value for a specific field ofWithdrawalCommitment.The code changes are approved.
api/opinit/opchild/v1/query.pulsar.go (6)
5-8: LGTM!The new imports are necessary for the added functionality.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
5828-7872: LGTM!The initialization logic for the new message types is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
7310-7401: LGTM!The new message types are well-defined and include necessary fields for handling withdrawal proofs.
The code changes are approved.
7486-7601: LGTM!The raw descriptor data for the new message types is correctly included.
The code changes are approved.
7616-7671: LGTM!The updates to the message types and dependencies are correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
7849-7880: LGTM!The exporter functions for the new message types are correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
beer-1
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
x/opchild/keeper/keeper.go (2)
68-79: Acknowledge changes to theNewKeeperconstructor function.The
NewKeeperconstructor function has been updated to include two new parameters:decoratorsof typesdk.AnteHandlerandtxDecoderof typesdk.TxDecoder. This change aligns with the modifications made to theKeeperstruct.Add a TODO comment to track the implementation of the recommended decorators.
The comment block provides useful information on the recommended decorators to be used. Consider adding a TODO comment to track the implementation of these decorators.
Apply this diff to add a TODO comment:
+// TODO: Implement the recommended decorators /* Should provide the following decorators sdk.ChainAnteDecorators( authante.NewSetPubKeyDecorator(accountKeeper), authante.NewValidateSigCountDecorator(accountKeeper), authante.NewSigGasConsumeDecorator(accountKeeper, authante.DefaultSigVerificationGasConsumer), authante.NewSigVerificationDecorator(accountKeeper, signModeHandler), authante.NewIncrementSequenceDecorator(accountKeeper), ), */
32-35: Potential issues due to the removal of thebridgeHookfieldThe
bridgeHookfield is actively used in thex/ophost/keeper/msg_server.gofile and is part of the testing setup inx/ophost/keeper/common_test.go. Its removal from theKeeperstruct inx/opchild/keeper/keeper.gocould break existing functionality and lead to test failures. Please review the usage ofbridgeHookin these files and ensure that any necessary adjustments are made to maintain functionality.
- File:
x/ophost/keeper/msg_server.go- File:
x/ophost/keeper/common_test.goAnalysis chain
Acknowledge changes to the
Keeperstruct.The
Keeperstruct has been modified to include two new fields:decoratorsof typesdk.AnteHandlerandtxDecoderof typesdk.TxDecoder. This change suggests that theKeeperis now responsible for handling transaction decorators and decoding.Additionally, the
bridgeHookfield has been removed from theKeeperstruct, indicating a change in theKeeper's functionality related to the bridge hook.Verify the impact of removing the
bridgeHookfield.Please ensure that the removal of the
bridgeHookfield does not break any existing functionality or introduce any unintended consequences.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
bridgeHookfield:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `bridgeHook` field in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `bridgeHook` field. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go -A 5 $'bridgeHook'Length of output: 8325
x/ophost/types/tx.go (1)
Line range hint
233-278: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacimproves readability without altering the underlying logic. The additional validation check forlastBlockHashlength enhances the robustness of the validation logic.The static analysis tool reports that the added line is not covered by tests. Do you want me to generate a unit test for
MsgFinalizeTokenWithdrawal.Validatethat covers thelastBlockHashlength check?Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 218-218: x/ophost/types/tx.go#L218
Added line #L218 was not covered by tests
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (6)
api/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumx/opchild/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/opchild/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/opchild/types/types.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/ophost/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (41)
- api/go.mod (1 hunks)
- api/opinit/opchild/v1/genesis.pulsar.go (21 hunks)
- api/opinit/opchild/v1/tx.pulsar.go (2 hunks)
- api/opinit/opchild/v1/types.pulsar.go (10 hunks)
- api/opinit/ophost/v1/tx.pulsar.go (18 hunks)
- go.mod (1 hunks)
- proto/opinit/opchild/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/opinit/opchild/v1/tx.proto (3 hunks)
- proto/opinit/opchild/v1/types.proto (3 hunks)
- proto/opinit/ophost/v1/tx.proto (3 hunks)
- x/opchild/abci.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/ante/ante_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/opchild/ante/common_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/opchild/ante/fee_utils.go (2 hunks)
- x/opchild/client/cli/tx_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/common_test.go (9 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/genesis.go (3 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/keeper.go (5 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go (8 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/msg_server_test.go (14 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/oracle.go (2 hunks)
- x/opchild/keeper/querier.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/module.go (2 hunks)
- x/opchild/types/codec.go (2 hunks)
- x/opchild/types/events.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/types/genesis.go (4 hunks)
- x/opchild/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/opchild/types/tx.go (1 hunks)
- x/ophost/client/cli/tx.go (4 hunks)
- x/ophost/client/cli/tx_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/ophost/keeper/msg_server.go (5 hunks)
- x/ophost/keeper/msg_server_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/codec.go (2 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/error.go (1 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/event.go (1 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/output.go (1 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/tx.go (13 hunks)
- x/ophost/types/tx_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- go.mod
- x/opchild/keeper/oracle.go
- x/ophost/types/keys.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (12)
- api/opinit/opchild/v1/tx.pulsar.go
- proto/opinit/opchild/v1/tx.proto
- proto/opinit/ophost/v1/tx.proto
- x/opchild/ante/ante_test.go
- x/opchild/client/cli/tx_test.go
- x/opchild/keeper/msg_server_test.go
- x/opchild/keeper/querier.go
- x/opchild/module.go
- x/ophost/client/cli/tx_test.go
- x/ophost/keeper/msg_server_test.go
- x/ophost/types/error.go
- x/ophost/types/tx_test.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/opchild/abci.go
[warning] 19-19: x/opchild/abci.go#L19
Added line #L19 was not covered by tests
[warning] 25-25: x/opchild/abci.go#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by testsx/ophost/types/output.go
[warning] 35-35: x/ophost/types/output.go#L35
Added line #L35 was not covered by tests
[warning] 37-38: x/ophost/types/output.go#L37-L38
Added lines #L37 - L38 were not covered by tests
[warning] 40-41: x/ophost/types/output.go#L40-L41
Added lines #L40 - L41 were not covered by tests
[warning] 43-44: x/ophost/types/output.go#L43-L44
Added lines #L43 - L44 were not covered by testsx/ophost/types/codec.go
[warning] 24-24: x/ophost/types/codec.go#L24
Added line #L24 was not covered by tests
[warning] 43-43: x/ophost/types/codec.go#L43
Added line #L43 was not covered by testsx/opchild/keeper/deposit.go
[warning] 14-15: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L14-L15
Added lines #L14 - L15 were not covered by tests
[warning] 25-27: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L25-L27
Added lines #L25 - L27 were not covered by tests
[warning] 31-33: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L31-L33
Added lines #L31 - L33 were not covered by tests
[warning] 40-42: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L40-L42
Added lines #L40 - L42 were not covered by tests
[warning] 70-71: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L70-L71
Added lines #L70 - L71 were not covered by tests
[warning] 75-76: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L75-L76
Added lines #L75 - L76 were not covered by tests
[warning] 85-87: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L85-L87
Added lines #L85 - L87 were not covered by testsx/opchild/types/genesis.go
[warning] 26-26: x/opchild/types/genesis.go#L26
Added line #L26 was not covered by tests
[warning] 40-40: x/opchild/types/genesis.go#L40
Added line #L40 was not covered by tests
[warning] 61-64: x/opchild/types/genesis.go#L61-L64
Added lines #L61 - L64 were not covered by testsx/ophost/types/tx.go
[warning] 110-111: x/ophost/types/tx.go#L110-L111
Added lines #L110 - L111 were not covered by tests
[warning] 143-144: x/ophost/types/tx.go#L143-L144
Added lines #L143 - L144 were not covered by tests
[warning] 179-180: x/ophost/types/tx.go#L179-L180
Added lines #L179 - L180 were not covered by tests
[warning] 190-190: x/ophost/types/tx.go#L190
Added line #L190 was not covered by tests
[warning] 218-218: x/ophost/types/tx.go#L218
Added line #L218 was not covered by testsx/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go
[warning] 112-115: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L112-L115
Added lines #L112 - L115 were not covered by tests
[warning] 117-117: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L117
Added line #L117 was not covered by tests
[warning] 402-403: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L402-L403
Added lines #L402 - L403 were not covered by tests
[warning] 455-455: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L455
Added line #L455 was not covered by tests
[warning] 460-460: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L460
Added line #L460 was not covered by tests
[warning] 499-500: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L499-L500
Added lines #L499 - L500 were not covered by testsx/ophost/keeper/msg_server.go
[warning] 246-247: x/ophost/keeper/msg_server.go#L246-L247
Added lines #L246 - L247 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (98)
api/go.mod (9)
6-6: LGTM!The minor version bump to
cosmossdk.io/apiis approved.
8-8: LGTM!The minor version bump to
github.com/cosmos/gogoprotois approved.
10-10: LGTM!The minor version bump to
google.golang.org/grpcis approved.
11-11: LGTM!The patch version bump to
google.golang.org/protobufis approved.
16-16: LGTM!The update to a specific commit hash for
golang.org/x/expis approved.
17-17: LGTM!The minor version bump to
golang.org/x/netis approved.
18-18: LGTM!The minor version bump to
golang.org/x/sysis approved.
19-19: LGTM!The minor version bump to
golang.org/x/textis approved.
20-20: LGTM!The update to a specific commit hash for
google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcis approved.x/opchild/abci.go (2)
Line range hint
25-40: LGTM! The function signature change is approved.The function signature change enhances efficiency by allowing direct manipulation of the
Keeperinstance without copying the entire structure. The function's logic remains largely unchanged and the changes are minimal.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 19-19: x/opchild/abci.go#L19
Added line #L19 was not covered by tests
[warning] 25-25: x/opchild/abci.go#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by tests
19-22: LGTM! The function signature change and the new call tok.TrackHistoricalInfo(ctx)are approved.The function signature change enhances efficiency by allowing direct manipulation of the
Keeperinstance without copying the entire structure. The new call tok.TrackHistoricalInfo(ctx)is crucial for tracking historical data at the start of each block and improves the function's logic and state management.Reminder: Add tests for the new functionality.
The new call to
k.TrackHistoricalInfo(ctx)should be covered by tests to ensure its correctness.Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 19-19: x/opchild/abci.go#L19
Added line #L19 was not covered by testsx/opchild/types/keys.go (7)
22-22: LGTM!The code change is approved.
24-24: LGTM!The code change is approved.
25-25: LGTM!The code change is approved.
26-26: LGTM!The code change is approved.
28-28: LGTM!The code change is approved.
31-31: LGTM!The code change is approved.
32-32: LGTM!The code change is approved.
x/opchild/ante/fee_utils.go (2)
4-4: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
30-30: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The new implementation enhances type safety and potentially improves precision in calculations by using a more robust mathematical representation for handling the gas limit.
x/opchild/types/events.go (3)
23-23: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
24-24: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
32-32: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
proto/opinit/opchild/v1/genesis.proto (5)
23-23: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
24-24: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
25-25: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
26-26: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
28-28: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/keeper/genesis_test.go (1)
29-30: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The code segment is correctly setting a denomination pair in the
OPChildKeeperand handling errors appropriately.x/ophost/types/event.go (1)
13-13: LGTM!The addition of the
EventTypeUpdateMetadataconstant is a valid enhancement to the event processing capabilities, as it allows for more granular event tracking and handling related to metadata updates. The constant is correctly defined and follows the naming convention of other event type constants.x/opchild/types/codec.go (4)
21-21: LGTM!The code change is approved.
22-22: LGTM!The code change is approved.
37-37: LGTM!The code change is approved.
38-38: LGTM!The code change is approved.
x/ophost/types/output.go (2)
40-41: Similar to the previous comment, add tests.Hashing the
receiveraddress using SHA3-256 before appending it to theseedenhances the security of the hash generation process by ensuring that the address is not stored in plain text.However, the static analysis tool has flagged these lines as not being covered by tests.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 40-41: x/ophost/types/output.go#L40-L41
Added lines #L40 - L41 were not covered by tests
43-44: Similar to the previous comments, add tests.Hashing the
denomstring using SHA3-256 before appending it to theseedenhances the security of the hash generation process by ensuring that the string is not stored in plain text.However, the static analysis tool has flagged these lines as not being covered by tests.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 43-44: x/ophost/types/output.go#L43-L44
Added lines #L43 - L44 were not covered by testsx/opchild/keeper/deposit.go (2)
11-55: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 14-15: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L14-L15
Added lines #L14 - L15 were not covered by tests
[warning] 25-27: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L25-L27
Added lines #L25 - L27 were not covered by tests
[warning] 31-33: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L31-L33
Added lines #L31 - L33 were not covered by tests
[warning] 40-42: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L40-L42
Added lines #L40 - L42 were not covered by tests
57-100: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 70-71: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L70-L71
Added lines #L70 - L71 were not covered by tests
[warning] 75-76: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L75-L76
Added lines #L75 - L76 were not covered by tests
[warning] 85-87: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L85-L87
Added lines #L85 - L87 were not covered by testsx/opchild/keeper/genesis.go (2)
92-93: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The new logic correctly sets the denomination pairs in the state, aligning with the shift in functionality to prioritize denomination management.
146-148: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The new logic correctly retrieves the denomination pairs and appends them to the exported genesis state, aligning with the shift in functionality to prioritize denomination management.
proto/opinit/opchild/v1/types.proto (3)
10-10: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
123-124: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
125-128: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/keeper/keeper.go (2)
109-110: LGTM!The changes to the
Keeperstruct initialization in theNewKeeperfunction align with the modifications made to theKeeperstruct and theNewKeeperconstructor function.
124-124: Acknowledge the removal of thePendingDepositsfield.The
PendingDepositsfield has been removed from theKeeperstruct initialization in theNewKeeperfunction. This change aligns with the modifications made to theKeeperstruct.Verify the impact of removing the
PendingDepositsfield.The AI-generated summary suggests that the removal of the
PendingDepositsfield may imply a refactoring of how deposits are managed within the module. Please ensure that this change does not break any existing functionality or introduce any unintended consequences.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
PendingDepositsfield:Verification successful
Verification successful: No issues found with the removal of
PendingDeposits.The
PendingDepositsfield has been completely removed from the codebase, as confirmed by the absence of any references. This suggests that its removal is part of a broader refactoring effort and does not impact existing functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `PendingDeposits` field in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `PendingDeposits` field. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go -A 5 $'PendingDeposits'Length of output: 35
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any references to `PendingDeposits` in the codebase, including comments and documentation. # Test: Search for any occurrences of `PendingDeposits` in the codebase. rg 'PendingDeposits'Length of output: 20
x/opchild/types/tx.go (1)
261-262: Verify the impact and correctness of allowing zero amounts for token deposits.The validation logic for
MsgFinalizeTokenDeposithas been modified to allow zero amounts. Previously, the validation would return an error if the amount was either invalid or zero. With this change, a zero amount is now considered valid as long as the amount itself is valid.Please ensure that allowing zero amounts aligns with the intended behavior and does not introduce any vulnerabilities or unexpected consequences. Consider the following:
- Is it safe and correct to allow zero amounts for token deposits?
- Are there any potential security risks or edge cases that need to be handled?
- Does this change affect the overall functionality and integrity of the token deposit process?
To verify the correctness and impact of this change, please review the relevant specifications, design documents, and test cases. Ensure that the modified behavior is thoroughly tested and validated.
If you have any concerns or need further clarification, please let me know.
x/ophost/client/cli/tx.go (5)
Line range hint
122-127: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
152-152: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
338-347: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
363-365: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
369-371: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 374-376, 379-379
x/ophost/types/tx.go (7)
43-55: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacimproves readability without altering the validation logic.
205-228: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacand the variable name change fromlatestBlockHashtolastBlockHashimprove readability and consistency without altering the underlying logic.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 218-218: x/ophost/types/tx.go#L218
Added line #L218 was not covered by tests
300-301: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacimproves readability without altering the validation logic.
Line range hint
332-343: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacimproves readability without altering the validation logic.
378-379: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacimproves readability without altering the validation logic.
437-438: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacimproves readability without altering the validation logic.
464-465: LGTM!The parameter name change from
accAddressCodectoacimproves readability without altering the validation logic.x/opchild/ante/common_test.go (4)
34-34: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
245-246: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
299-306: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
321-321: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
x/opchild/keeper/common_test.go (5)
20-20: Also applies to: 24-24, 28-28, 33-33, 35-35, 38-39
Line range hint
62-67: LGTM!The change from
ed25519tosecp256k1for generating the public keys is approved as it aligns with the best practices for the Cosmos SDK.
127-131: Also applies to: 134-135
207-207: LGTM!The following changes are approved:
- The addition of the
Cdcfield to theTestKeepersstruct enhances its functionality by allowing it to hold a codec instance for serialization and deserialization tasks.- The change in the
keyPubAddrfunction to usesecp256k1instead ofed25519aligns with the best practices for the Cosmos SDK.Also applies to: 230-238
268-269: LGTM!The following changes are approved:
- The introduction of the
generateTestTxfunction enhances the overall structure and modularity of the code by encapsulating the logic for creating test transactions.- The changes in the
_createTestInputfunction, such as the modifications to message routing, ante handlers, and keeper initialization, are correct and align with the best practices for the Cosmos SDK.Also applies to: 290-290, 309-311, 325-332, 347-347, 352-359, 363-415
x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go (4)
20-20: LGTM!The changes to the
MsgServerstruct are approved. Holding a pointer to theKeepertype is a good practice for memory efficiency.
26-27: LGTM!The changes to the
NewMsgServerImplfunction are approved. The function signature aligns with the updatedMsgServerstruct and the pointer-based approach for memory efficiency.
Line range hint
512-530: LGTM!The addition of the
emitWithdrawEventsfunction is approved. Encapsulating the logic for emitting withdrawal events and including the base denom in the event attributes improves code organization and provides more context to the withdrawal process.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 499-500: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L499-L500
Added lines #L499 - L500 were not covered by tests
Line range hint
533-564: LGTM!The changes to the
UpdateOraclefunction are approved. The addition of permission and config checks improves security, and the emission of an event with relevant attributes enhances the transparency of the oracle update process.x/ophost/keeper/msg_server.go (3)
273-275: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
283-306: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
313-567: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
api/opinit/opchild/v1/genesis.pulsar.go (4)
1451-1455: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
604-618: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
623-628: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
848-867: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
api/opinit/opchild/v1/types.pulsar.go (4)
Line range hint
2775-3541: LGTM!The code segment for the
Paramsmessage type looks good. No issues found.
Line range hint
3555-3579: LGTM!The code segment for the
Validatormessage type looks good. No issues found.
3661-3662: LGTM!The code segment for the
CoinsWrappermessage type looks good. No issues found.
Line range hint
3709-3821: LGTM!The code segment for registering the protobuf message types and enums looks good. The removal of the
PendingDepositsmessage type from the registration is consistent with the other changes.api/opinit/ophost/v1/tx.pulsar.go (16)
4809-4809: LGTM!The field descriptor renaming is consistent with the overall field renaming.
4824-4824: LGTM!The field descriptor initialization is updated to use the new field name.
4946-4948: LGTM!The conditional check is updated to use the new field name.
4985-4986: LGTM!The case statement is updated to use the new field name.
5021-5022: LGTM!The case statement is updated to use the new field name.
5069-5070: LGTM!The case statement is updated to use the new field name.
5112-5113: LGTM!The case statement is updated to use the new field name.
5159-5160: LGTM!The error message is updated to use the new field name.
5194-5194: LGTM!The case statement is updated to use the new field name.
5300-5300: LGTM!The length check is updated to use the new field name.
5333-5336: LGTM!The encoding logic is updated to use the new field name.
5714-5714: LGTM!The error message in the decoding logic is updated to use the new field name.
5741-5743: LGTM!The decoding logic is updated to use the new field name.
12350-12352: LGTM!The
MsgFinalizeTokenWithdrawalstruct definition is updated to use the new field name.
12438-12440: LGTM!The getter method for the
LastBlockHashfield is updated.
13184-13188: LGTM!The YAML annotation for the
last_block_hashfield is updated.
| senderDigest := sha3.Sum256([]byte(sender)) | ||
| seed = append(seed, senderDigest[:]...) // put utf8 encoded address |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good security enhancement, but add tests.
Hashing the sender address using SHA3-256 before appending it to the seed enhances the security of the hash generation process by ensuring that the address is not stored in plain text. 👍
However, the static analysis tool has flagged these lines as not being covered by tests.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 37-38: x/ophost/types/output.go#L37-L38
Added lines #L37 - L38 were not covered by tests
| @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ | |||
| legacy.RegisterAminoMsg(cdc, &MsgUpdateChallengers{}, "ophost/MsgUpdateChallengers") | |||
| legacy.RegisterAminoMsg(cdc, &MsgUpdateBatchInfo{}, "ophost/MsgUpdateBatchInfo") | |||
| legacy.RegisterAminoMsg(cdc, &MsgUpdateParams{}, "ophost/MsgUpdateParams") | |||
| legacy.RegisterAminoMsg(cdc, &MsgUpdateMetadata{}, "ophost/MsgUpdateMetadata") | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! But please add tests.
The addition of the new message type MsgUpdateMetadata is consistent with the existing code pattern.
However, the added line is not covered by tests.
Please add tests to cover the new message type. Let me know if you need any assistance with writing the tests.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 24-24: x/ophost/types/codec.go#L24
Added line #L24 was not covered by tests
| @@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ | |||
| &MsgUpdateChallengers{}, | |||
| &MsgUpdateBatchInfo{}, | |||
| &MsgUpdateParams{}, | |||
| &MsgUpdateMetadata{}, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! But please add tests.
The addition of the new message type MsgUpdateMetadata is consistent with the existing code pattern.
However, the added line is not covered by tests.
Please add tests to cover the new message type. Let me know if you need any assistance with writing the tests.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 43-43: x/ophost/types/codec.go#L43
Added line #L43 was not covered by tests
| func (k Keeper) handleBridgeHook(ctx sdk.Context, data []byte) (success bool, reason string) { | ||
| defer func() { | ||
| if r := recover(); r != nil { | ||
| reason = fmt.Sprintf("panic: %v", r) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const maxReasonLength = 128 | ||
| if len(reason) > maxReasonLength { | ||
| reason = reason[:maxReasonLength] + "..." | ||
| } | ||
| }() | ||
|
|
||
| tx, err := k.txDecoder(data) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| reason = fmt.Sprintf("Failed to decode tx: %s", err) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| ctx, err = k.decorators(ctx, tx, false) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| reason = fmt.Sprintf("Failed to run AnteHandler: %s", err) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // use cache context from here to avoid resetting sequencer number on failure | ||
| cacheCtx, commit := ctx.CacheContext() | ||
| for _, msg := range tx.GetMsgs() { | ||
| handler := k.router.Handler(msg) | ||
| if handler == nil { | ||
| reason = fmt.Sprintf("Unrecognized Msg type: %s", sdk.MsgTypeURL(msg)) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| _, err = handler(cacheCtx, msg) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| reason = fmt.Sprintf("Failed to execute Msg: %s", err) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| commit() | ||
| success = true | ||
|
|
||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add test coverage for error handling paths.
The static analysis tool has flagged the following lines as not being covered by tests:
- Lines 14-15: Handling a panic in the deferred function.
- Lines 25-27: Handling an error when decoding the transaction.
- Lines 31-33: Handling an error when running the AnteHandler.
- Lines 40-42: Handling an unrecognized message type.
Please add test cases to cover these error handling paths. Let me know if you need any assistance with writing the tests.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 14-15: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L14-L15
Added lines #L14 - L15 were not covered by tests
[warning] 25-27: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L25-L27
Added lines #L25 - L27 were not covered by tests
[warning] 31-33: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L31-L33
Added lines #L31 - L33 were not covered by tests
[warning] 40-42: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L40-L42
Added lines #L40 - L42 were not covered by tests
| // safeDepositToken mint and send coins to the recipient. Rollback all state changes | ||
| // if the deposit is failed. | ||
| func (ms MsgServer) safeDepositToken(ctx context.Context, toAddr sdk.AccAddress, coins sdk.Coins) (success bool, reason string) { | ||
| // if coin is zero, just create an account | ||
| if coins.IsZero() { | ||
| newAcc := ms.authKeeper.NewAccountWithAddress(ctx, toAddr) | ||
| ms.authKeeper.SetAccount(ctx, newAcc) | ||
| return true, "" | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var err error | ||
| defer func() { | ||
| if r := recover(); r != nil { | ||
| reason = fmt.Sprintf("panic: %v", r) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const maxReasonLength = 128 | ||
| if len(reason) > maxReasonLength { | ||
| reason = reason[:maxReasonLength] + "..." | ||
| } | ||
| }() | ||
|
|
||
| // use cache context to avoid relaying failure | ||
| sdkCtx := sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(ctx) | ||
| cacheCtx, commit := sdkCtx.CacheContext() | ||
|
|
||
| // mint coins to the module account | ||
| if err = ms.bankKeeper.MintCoins(cacheCtx, types.ModuleName, coins); err != nil { | ||
| reason = fmt.Sprintf("failed to mint coins: %s", err) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // transfer can be failed due to contract logics | ||
| if err = ms.bankKeeper.SendCoinsFromModuleToAccount(cacheCtx, types.ModuleName, toAddr, coins); err != nil { | ||
| reason = fmt.Sprintf("failed to send coins: %s", err) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // write the changes only if the transfer is successful | ||
| commit() | ||
| success = true | ||
|
|
||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add test coverage for error handling paths.
The static analysis tool has flagged the following lines as not being covered by tests:
- Lines 70-71: Handling a panic in the deferred function.
- Lines 75-76: Truncating the reason string if it's too long.
- Lines 85-87: Handling an error when minting coins.
Please add test cases to cover these error handling paths. Let me know if you need any assistance with writing the tests.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 70-71: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L70-L71
Added lines #L70 - L71 were not covered by tests
[warning] 75-76: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L75-L76
Added lines #L75 - L76 were not covered by tests
[warning] 85-87: x/opchild/keeper/deposit.go#L85-L87
Added lines #L85 - L87 were not covered by tests
| // allow zero amount for creating account | ||
| if !msg.Amount.IsValid() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM!
Allowing zero amounts for MsgInitiateTokenDeposit broadens the functionality by enabling account creation without an initial deposit.
The static analysis tool reports that the added line is not covered by tests. Do you want me to generate a unit test for MsgInitiateTokenDeposit.Validate that covers the zero amount case?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 190-190: x/ophost/types/tx.go#L190
Added line #L190 was not covered by tests
| signer, err := ms.addressCodec.BytesToString(signers[0]) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return nil, errorsmod.Wrap(types.ErrInvalidSigner, signer) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve test coverage for the added lines.
The changes to the ExecuteMessages function improve error handling and logging by providing more context in the error messages.
However, the added lines (112-115, 117) are not covered by tests according to the static analysis hints.
Do you want me to generate test cases to cover these lines or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 112-115: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L112-L115
Added lines #L112 - L115 were not covered by tests
[warning] 117-117: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L117
Added line #L117 was not covered by tests
| // deposit token | ||
| var success bool | ||
| var reason string | ||
| toAddr, err := ms.authKeeper.AddressCodec().StringToBytes(req.To) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| success = false | ||
| reason = fmt.Sprintf("failed to convert recipient address: %s", err) | ||
| } else { | ||
| // rollback if the deposit is failed | ||
| success, reason = ms.safeDepositToken(ctx, toAddr, sdk.NewCoins(coin)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve test coverage for the added lines.
The changes to the FinalizeTokenDeposit function significantly improve the robustness and transparency of the token deposit process:
- The new mechanism for handling failed deposits by initiating a withdrawal is a good addition.
- The emission of additional event attributes enhances the transparency of the operation.
However, some added lines (402-403, 455, 460) are not covered by tests according to the static analysis hints.
Do you want me to generate test cases to cover these lines or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Also applies to: 437-445, 451-460
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 402-403: x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go#L402-L403
Added lines #L402 - L403 were not covered by tests
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements
Keeperstruct for better transaction processing.Bug Fixes
Tests
MsgRecordBatchmessage type, ensuring validation logic is thoroughly covered.