use custom cache store to properly implement interfaces #46
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the project's caching capabilities by directly incorporating Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant EVMIndexerImpl
participant CacheStore
participant DB
User->>EVMIndexerImpl: Request data
EVMIndexerImpl->>CacheStore: Check cache for data
alt Data exists in cache
CacheStore-->>EVMIndexerImpl: Return cached data
else Data not in cache
EVMIndexerImpl->>DB: Fetch data from database
DB-->>EVMIndexerImpl: Return data
EVMIndexerImpl->>CacheStore: Store data in cache
CacheStore-->>EVMIndexerImpl: Confirm storage
end
EVMIndexerImpl-->>User: Provide data
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #46 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 26.19% 26.54% +0.34%
==========================================
Files 110 111 +1
Lines 11707 11766 +59
==========================================
+ Hits 3067 3123 +56
Misses 8198 8198
- Partials 442 445 +3
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
indexer/abci.go (1)
Line range hint
33-185: Add test coverage forListenFinalizeBlock.The
ListenFinalizeBlockmethod now usessdkCtx, but there is no test coverage for this change. Ensure that tests are added to verify the context management and database operations.Would you like me to help create unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 147-147: indexer/abci.go#L147
Added line #L147 was not covered by tests
[warning] 151-151: indexer/abci.go#L151
Added line #L151 was not covered by tests
[warning] 157-157: indexer/abci.go#L157
Added line #L157 was not covered by tests
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- go.mod (2 hunks)
- indexer/abci.go (4 hunks)
- indexer/indexer.go (3 hunks)
- indexer/store.go (1 hunks)
- indexer/utils.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
indexer/utils.go
[warning] 83-83: indexer/utils.go#L83
Added line #L83 was not covered by tests
[warning] 87-87: indexer/utils.go#L87
Added line #L87 was not covered by testsindexer/store.go
[warning] 20-28: indexer/store.go#L20-L28
Added lines #L20 - L28 were not covered by tests
[warning] 31-34: indexer/store.go#L31-L34
Added lines #L31 - L34 were not covered by tests
[warning] 38-43: indexer/store.go#L38-L43
Added lines #L38 - L43 were not covered by tests
[warning] 46-49: indexer/store.go#L46-L49
Added lines #L46 - L49 were not covered by tests
[warning] 52-54: indexer/store.go#L52-L54
Added lines #L52 - L54 were not covered by tests
[warning] 58-62: indexer/store.go#L58-L62
Added lines #L58 - L62 were not covered by tests
[warning] 64-67: indexer/store.go#L64-L67
Added lines #L64 - L67 were not covered by tests
[warning] 70-72: indexer/store.go#L70-L72
Added lines #L70 - L72 were not covered by tests
[warning] 76-86: indexer/store.go#L76-L86
Added lines #L76 - L86 were not covered by tests
[warning] 90-99: indexer/store.go#L90-L99
Added lines #L90 - L99 were not covered by tests
[warning] 108-109: indexer/store.go#L108-L109
Added lines #L108 - L109 were not covered by tests
[warning] 117-118: indexer/store.go#L117-L118
Added lines #L117 - L118 were not covered by tests
[warning] 121-122: indexer/store.go#L121-L122
Added lines #L121 - L122 were not covered by testsindexer/indexer.go
[warning] 85-85: indexer/indexer.go#L85
Added line #L85 was not covered by testsindexer/abci.go
[warning] 33-33: indexer/abci.go#L33
Added line #L33 was not covered by tests
[warning] 67-67: indexer/abci.go#L67
Added line #L67 was not covered by tests
[warning] 71-71: indexer/abci.go#L71
Added line #L71 was not covered by tests
[warning] 147-147: indexer/abci.go#L147
Added line #L147 was not covered by tests
[warning] 151-151: indexer/abci.go#L151
Added line #L151 was not covered by tests
[warning] 157-157: indexer/abci.go#L157
Added line #L157 was not covered by tests
[warning] 181-181: indexer/abci.go#L181
Added line #L181 was not covered by tests
[warning] 185-185: indexer/abci.go#L185
Added line #L185 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (1)
go.mod (1)
18-18: Dependency change approved. Verifybigcacheusage in the codebase.The change from an indirect to a direct dependency for
github.com/allegro/bigcache/v3is consistent with the PR's objective to implement a custom cache store. Ensure that all usages of this package are correctly implemented and documented.Verification successful
Verification successful:
bigcacheusage is consistent and properly implemented.The
bigcachelibrary is directly used inindexer/store.gowithin theCacheStorestruct and its initialization. The implementation aligns with the dependency change ingo.mod. Ensure that this usage is documented if necessary.
- File:
indexer/store.go- Key Usages:
CacheStorestruct with*bigcache.BigCache- Initialization with
bigcache.New- Error handling for
bigcache.ErrEntryNotFoundScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `bigcache` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the `bigcache` usage. Expect: Proper implementation and documentation. rg --type go -A 5 'bigcache'Length of output: 1153
| return &CacheStore{ | ||
| store: cachekv.NewStore(store), | ||
| cache: cache, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add test coverage for NewCacheStore.
The NewCacheStore function initializes a new cache store, but there is no test coverage for this functionality. Ensure that tests are added to verify the initialization process.
Would you like me to help create unit tests for this function or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 31-34: indexer/store.go#L31-L34
Added lines #L31 - L34 were not covered by tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- indexer/store_test.go (1 hunks)
- indexer/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
indexer/store_test.go (1)
11-49: Comprehensive test coverage forCacheStore.The test function
Test_StoreIOeffectively covers the basic CRUD operations for theCacheStore. The use ofrequireassertions ensures that errors are properly handled and expected values are verified.indexer/utils_test.go (2)
Line range hint
10-37: Effective validation of data unpacking.The test function
Test_UnpackDataaccurately validates the serialization and deserialization ofMsgCreateResponse. The use ofrequireassertions ensures that errors are caught and the data integrity is maintained.
39-58: Successful test of JSON codec functionality.The test function
Test_collJsonValeffectively validates the encoding and decoding of a struct using a generic JSON codec. The assertions ensure that the JSON representation is correct and that the struct is accurately reconstructed.
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
CacheStoretype for efficient data caching, improving data retrieval performance.Refactor
CacheStoreby removing unnecessary dependencies.Bug Fixes
Tests
CacheStorefunctionality, validating core operations like key existence, setting, and deletion.